| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
```
go get -u github.com/client9/misspell/cmd/misspell
misspell -w -error -source=text .
```
|
| |
|
|
| |
(I personally prefer writing one string in one line no matter how long it is, though)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will cause a failure with the changes from 8e2e5f9:
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/8e2e5f9e3d1f434e265dc104ea9b00ff75702fc3
With the `singularize` call that is being done in that method when there
is multiple nestings of associations (JOIN calling a JOIN) and the
`stringify_keys!` is only called once here:
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/21e5fd4/activerecord/lib/active_record/relation/where_clause_factory.rb#L16
And not in the subsequent recursion in `.predicate_builder`
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch brings back the functionality of passing true to the
association proxy. The behavior was deprecated with #20888 and scheduled
for removal in Rails 5.1.
The deprecation mentioned that instead of `Article.category(true)` one
should use `article#reload.category`. Unfortunately the alternative does
not expose the same behavior as passing true to the reader
did. Specifically reloading the parent record throws unsaved changes and
other caches away. Passing true only affected the association.
This is problematic and there is no easy workaround. I propose to bring
back the old functionality by introducing this new reader method for
singular associations.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With the changes in #25337, double save bugs are pretty much impossible,
so we can just lift this restriction with pretty much no change. There
were a handful of cases where we were relying on specific quirks in
tests that had to be updated. The change to has_one associations was due
to a particularly interesting test where an autosaved has_one
association was replaced with a new child, where the child failed to
save but the test wanted to check that the parent id persisted to `nil`.
I think this is almost certainly the wrong behavior, and I may change
that behavior later. But ultimately the root cause was because we never
remove the parent in memory when nullifying the child. This makes #23197
no longer needed, but it is what we'll do to fix some issues on 5.0
Close #23197
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Style/SpaceBeforeBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideHashLiteralBraces
Fix all violations in the repository.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fixes #25128
|
| |\
| |
| |
| | |
`restrict_with_error` message will now respect owner’s human name
|
| |/
|
|
| |
locale [kuboon & Ronak Jangir]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since after 87d1aba3c `dependent: :destroy` callbacks on has_one
assocations run *after* destroy, it is possible that a nullification is
attempted on an already destroyed target:
class Car < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :engine, dependent: :nullify
end
class Engine < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :car, dependent: :destroy
end
> car = Car.create!
> engine = Engine.create!(car: car)
> engine.destroy! # => ActiveRecord::ActiveRecordError: cannot update a
> destroyed record
In the above case, `engine.destroy!` deletes `engine` and *then* triggers the
deletion of `car`, which in turn triggers a nullification of `engine.car_id`.
However, `engine` is already destroyed at that point.
Fixes #21223.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously `has_one` and `has_many` associations were using the
`one` and `many` keys respectively. Both of these keys have special
meaning in I18n (they are considered to be pluralizations) so by
renaming them to `has_one` and `has_many` we make the messages more
explicit and most importantly they don't clash with linguistical
systems that need to validate translation keys (and their
pluralizations).
The `:'restrict_dependent_destroy.one'` key should be replaced with
`:'restrict_dependent_destroy.has_one'`, and
`:'restrict_dependent_destroy.many'` with
`:'restrict_dependent_destroy.has_many'`.
[Roque Pinel & Christopher Dell]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We deprecate the support for passing an argument to force reload in
6eae366d0d2e5d5211eeaf955f56bd1dc6836758. That led to several
deprecation warning when running Active Record test suite.
This commit silence the warnings by properly calling `#reload` on the
association proxy or on the association object instead. However, there
are several places that `ActiveSupport::Deprecation.silence` are used as
those tests actually tests the force reload functionality and will be
removed once `master` is targeted next minor release (5.1).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is to simplify the association API, as you can call `reload` on the
association proxy or the parent object to get the same result.
For collection association, you can call `#reload` on association proxy
to force a reload:
@user.posts.reload # Instead of @user.posts(true)
For singular association, you can call `#reload` on the parent object to
clear its association cache then call the association method:
@user.reload.profile # Instead of @user.profile(true)
Passing a truthy argument to force association to reload will be removed
in Rails 5.1.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I’m renaming all instances of `use_transcational_fixtures` to
`use_transactional_tests` and “transactional fixtures” to
“transactional tests”.
I’m deprecating `use_transactional_fixtures=`. So anyone who is
explicitly setting this will get a warning telling them to use
`use_transactional_tests=` instead.
I’m maintaining backwards compatibility—both forms will work.
`use_transactional_tests` will check to see if
`use_transactional_fixtures` is set and use that, otherwise it will use
itself. But because `use_transactional_tests` is a class attribute
(created with `class_attribute`) this requires a little bit of hoop
jumping. The writer method that `class_attribute` generates defines a
new reader method that return the value being set. Which means we can’t
set the default of `true` using `use_transactional_tests=` as was done
previously because that won’t take into account anyone using
`use_transactional_fixtures`. Instead I defined the reader method
manually and it checks `use_transactional_fixtures`. If it was set then
it should be used, otherwise it should return the default, which is
`true`. If someone uses `use_transactional_tests=` then it will
overwrite the backwards-compatible method with whatever they set.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The name `ActiveModel::AttributeAssignment::UnknownAttributeError` is
too implementation specific so let's move the constant directly under
the ActiveModel namespace.
Also since this constant used to be under the ActiveRecord namespace, to
make the upgrade path easier, let's avoid raising the former constant
when we deal with this error on the Active Record side.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The only place it was accessed was in tests. Many of them have another
way that they can test their behavior, that doesn't involve reaching
into internals as far as they did. `AssociationScopeTest` is testing a
situation where the where clause would have one bind param per
predicate, so it can just ignore the predicates entirely. The where
chain test was primarly duplicating the logic tested on `WhereClause`
directly, so I instead just make sure it calls the appropriate method
which is fully tested in isolation.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
`ActiveModel::AttributesAssignment`
Allows to use it for any object as an includable module.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This error only happens when the foreign key is missing.
Before this fix the following exception was being raised:
NoMethodError: undefined method `val' for #<Arel::Nodes::BindParam:0x007fc64d19c218>
Now the message is:
ActiveRecord::UnknownAttributeError: unknown attribute 'foreign_key' for Model.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To be possible to use a custom column name to save/read the polymorphic
associated type in a has_many or has_one polymorphic association, now users
can use the option :foreign_type to inform in what column the associated object
type will be saved.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Since 3e30c5d, it started ignoring the given error message. This commit
changes the behavior of AR::RecordNotSaved#initialize so that it no
longer loses the given error message.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
`Computer` class needs to be require
See #17217 for more details
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Dangerous association names conflicts include instance or class
methods already defined by `ActiveRecord::Base`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since Rails 4.0, we add an ORDER BY in the `first` method to ensure consistent
results among different database engines. But for singular associations this
behavior is not needed since we will have one record to return. As this
ORDER BY option can lead some performance issues we are removing it for singular
associations accessors.
Fixes #12623.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, the `has_one` macro incorrectly accepts the `counter_cache` option
due to a bug, although that options was never supported nor functional on
`has_one` and `has_one ... through` relationships. It now correctly raises an
`ArgumentError` when passed that option.
For reference, this bug was introduced in 52f8e4b9.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
activerecord/lib/active_record/associations.rb states:
# [association=(associate)]
# Assigns the associate object, extracts the primary key, sets it as the foreign key,
# and saves the associate object.
Since commit 42dd5d9f2976677a4bf22347f2dde1a8135dfbb4 to fix #7191, this
is no longer the case if the associate has changed, but is the same
object. For example:
# Pirate has_one :ship
pirate = Pirate.create!(catchphrase: "A Pirate")
ship = pirate.build_ship(name: 'old name')
ship.save!
ship.name = 'new name'
pirate.ship = ship
That last line should trigger a save. Although we are not changing the
association, the associate (ship) has changed.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 637a7d9d357a0f3f725b0548282ca8c5e7d4af4a, reversing
changes made to 5937bd02dee112646469848d7fe8a8bfcef5b4c1.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allows you to do BaseClass.new(:type => "SubClass") as well as
parent.children.build(:type => "SubClass") or parent.build_child
to initialize an STI subclass. Ensures that the class name is a
valid class and that it is in the ancestors of the super class
that the association is expecting.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's not really a good idea to have this as a global config option. We
should allow people to specify the behaviour per association.
There will now be two new values:
* :dependent => :restrict_with_exception implements the current
behaviour of :restrict. :restrict itself is deprecated in favour of
:restrict_with_exception.
* :dependent => :restrict_with_error implements the new behaviour - it
adds an error to the owner if there are dependent records present
See #4727 for the original discussion of this.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It doesn't serve much purpose now that ActiveRecord::Base.all returns a
Relation.
The code is moved to active_record_deprecated_finders.
|
