| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ruby 2.4 unifies Fixnum and Bignum into Integer: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12005
* Forward compat with new unified Integer class in Ruby 2.4+.
* Backward compat with separate Fixnum/Bignum in Ruby 2.2 & 2.3.
* Drops needless Fixnum distinction in docs, preferring Integer.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When same association is loaded in the model creation callback
The new object is inserted into association twice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
initialize_attributes
If argument of `build_record` has key and value which is same as
default value of database, we should also except the key from
`create_scope` in `initialize_attributes`.
Because at first `build_record` initialize record object with argument
of `build_record`, then assign attributes derived from Association's scope.
In this case `record.changed` does not include the key, which value is
same as default value of database, so we should add the key to except list.
Fix #21893.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With `unscope!` called last, it undoes `where` constraints of the same
value when the `where` is chained after the `unscope`. This is what a
`rewhere` does. This is undesirable behavior.
The included tests demonstrate both the `unscope(...).where(...)`
behavior as well as the direct use of `rewhere(...)`.
This is in reference to #21955.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When I originally reviewed the #20317, I believe these changes were
present, but it appears that it was later updated so that they were
removed. Since Travis hadn't re-run the build, this slipped through.
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
`restrict_with_error` message will now respect owner’s human name
|
|/
|
|
| |
locale [kuboon & Ronak Jangir]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current implementation has a lot of utility methods that accept
reflection call a lot of methods on it and exit.
E.g. has_counter_cache?(reflection)
It causes confusion and inability to cache result of the method even
through it always returns the same result for the same reflection
object.
It can be done easier without access to the association context
by moving code into reflection itself.
e.g. reflection.has_counter_cache?
Reflection is less complex object than association so moving code there
automatically makes it simplier to understand.
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Require explicit counter_cache option for has_many
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Assert that counter_cache behaviour is not used on belongs_to or
has_many associations if the option is not given explicitly.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes #21082
remove extra space
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Deep down in the association internals, we're calling `destroy!` rather
than `destroy` when handling things like `dependent` or autosave
association callbacks. Unfortunately, due to the structure of the code
(e.g. it uses callbacks for everything), it's nearly impossible to pass
whether to call `destroy` or `destroy!` down to where we actually need
it.
As such, we have to do some legwork to handle this. Since the callbacks
are what actually raise the exception, we need to rescue it in
`ActiveRecord::Callbacks`, rather than `ActiveRecord::Persistence` where
it matters. (As an aside, if this code wasn't so callback heavy, it
would handling this would likely be as simple as changing `destroy` to
call `destroy!` instead of the other way around).
Since we don't want to lose the exception when `destroy!` is called (in
particular, we don't want the value of the `record` field to change to
the parent class), we have to do some additional legwork to hold onto it
where we can use it.
Again, all of this is ugly and there is definitely a better way to do
this. However, barring a much more significant re-architecting for what
I consider to be a reletively minor improvement, I'm willing to take
this small hit to the flow of this code (begrudgingly).
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Previously `has_one` and `has_many` associations were using the
`one` and `many` keys respectively. Both of these keys have special
meaning in I18n (they are considered to be pluralizations) so by
renaming them to `has_one` and `has_many` we make the messages more
explicit and most importantly they don't clash with linguistical
systems that need to validate translation keys (and their
pluralizations).
The `:'restrict_dependent_destroy.one'` key should be replaced with
`:'restrict_dependent_destroy.has_one'`, and
`:'restrict_dependent_destroy.many'` with
`:'restrict_dependent_destroy.has_many'`.
[Roque Pinel & Christopher Dell]
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We deprecate the support for passing an argument to force reload in
6eae366d0d2e5d5211eeaf955f56bd1dc6836758. That led to several
deprecation warning when running Active Record test suite.
This commit silence the warnings by properly calling `#reload` on the
association proxy or on the association object instead. However, there
are several places that `ActiveSupport::Deprecation.silence` are used as
those tests actually tests the force reload functionality and will be
removed once `master` is targeted next minor release (5.1).
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is to simplify the association API, as you can call `reload` on the
association proxy or the parent object to get the same result.
For collection association, you can call `#reload` on association proxy
to force a reload:
@user.posts.reload # Instead of @user.posts(true)
For singular association, you can call `#reload` on the parent object to
clear its association cache then call the association method:
@user.reload.profile # Instead of @user.profile(true)
Passing a truthy argument to force association to reload will be removed
in Rails 5.1.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When `AR::Base.save!` or `AR::Base.destroy!` is called and an exception
is raised, the exception doesn't have any error message or has a weird
message like `#<FailedBulb:0x0000000907b4b8>`. Give a better message so
we can easily understand why it's failing to save/destroy.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In 1f006c an option was added called :class to allow passing anonymous
classes to association definitions. Since using :class instead of
:class_name is a fairly common typo even amongst experienced developers
this can result in hard to debug errors arising in raise_on_type_mismatch?
To fix this we're renaming the option from :class to :anonymous_class as
that is a more correct description of what the option is for. Since this
was an internal, undocumented option there is no need for a deprecation.
Fixes #19659
|
|
|
|
| |
When replacing a has_many association with the same one, there is nothing to do with database but a setter method should still return the substituted value for backward compatibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
present from the start.
When a new record has the necessary information prior to save, we can
avoid busting the cache.
We could simply clear the @proxy on #reset or #reset_scope, but that
would clear the cache more often than necessary.
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
rebyn/fix/17161-remove-objs-from-has_many-updates-fields
Add specs for adding-to/clear has_many collections’s behavior on `updated_at`
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
There are behaviors mentioned in #17161 that:
1. are not documented properly, and
2. don't have specs
This commit addresses the spec absence. For has_many collections,
1. addition (<<) should update the associated object's updated_at (if any)
2. .clear, depending on options[:dependent], calls delete_all, destroy_all, or nullifies the associated object(s)' foreign key.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Use SQL COUNT and LIMIT 1 queries for none? and one? methods if no block or limit is given,
instead of loading the entire collection to memory. The any? and many? methods already
follow this behavior.
[Eugene Gilburg & Rafael Mendonça França]
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The only place it was accessed was in tests. Many of them have another
way that they can test their behavior, that doesn't involve reaching
into internals as far as they did. `AssociationScopeTest` is testing a
situation where the where clause would have one bind param per
predicate, so it can just ignore the predicates entirely. The where
chain test was primarly duplicating the logic tested on `WhereClause`
directly, so I instead just make sure it calls the appropriate method
which is fully tested in isolation.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
after_commit callbacks run after committing a transaction whose parent
is not `joinable?`: un-nested transactions, transactions within test
cases, and transactions in `console --sandbox`.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
To be possible to use a custom column name to save/read the polymorphic
associated type in a has_many or has_one polymorphic association, now users
can use the option :foreign_type to inform in what column the associated object
type will be saved.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since 3e30c5d, it started ignoring the given error message. This commit
changes the behavior of AR::RecordNotSaved#initialize so that it no
longer loses the given error message.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The records weren't being replaced since equality in Active Record is
defined in terms of `id` only. It is reasonable to expect that the
references would be replaced in memory, even if no queries are actually
executed. This change did not appear to affect any other parts of the
code base. I chose not to execute callbacks since we're not actually
modifying the association in a way that will be persisted.
Fixes #17730
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
`Computer` class needs to be require
See #17217 for more details
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Empact/association-bind-values-not-updated-on-save
Fix that a collection proxy could be cached before the save of the owner, resulting in an invalid proxy lacking the owner’s id
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
resulting in an invalid proxy lacking the owner’s id.
Absent this fix calls like: owner.association.update_all to behave unexpectedly because they try to act on association objects where
owner_id is null.
more evidence here: https://gist.github.com/Empact/5865555
```
Active Record 3.2.13
-- create_table(:firms, {:force=>true})
-> 0.1371s
-- create_table(:clients, {:force=>true})
-> 0.0005s
1 clients. 1 expected.
1 clients updated. 1 expected.
```
```
Active Record 4.0.0
-- create_table(:firms, {:force=>true})
-> 0.1606s
-- create_table(:clients, {:force=>true})
-> 0.0004s
1 clients. 1 expected.
0 clients updated. 1 expected.
```
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
if you specify a default scope on a model, it will break caching. We
cannot predict what will happen inside the scope, so play it safe for
now. fixes #17495
|
|/
|
|
| |
preloading, fixes #11036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Callback order in Active Record objects are important. Users should not
define callbacks before the association definition or surprising
behaviours like the described at #3798 will happen. This callback order
dependency is documented at https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/31bfcdc77ca0d8cec9b5fe513bdc6f05814dd4f1/activerecord/lib/active_record/associations.rb#L1222-1227.
This reverts #15728.
Fixes #16620.
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
If a counter_cache exists, use it for #empty?
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Reliant on https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/15747 but pulled to a
separate PR to reduce noise. `has_many :through` associations have the
undocumented behavior of automatically detecting counter caches.
However, the way in which it does so is inconsistent with counter caches
everywhere else, and doesn't actually work consistently.
As with normal `has_many` associations, the user should specify the
counter cache on the `belongs_to`, if they'd like it updated.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before, calling `size` would only work if it skipped the cache, and
would return a different result from the cache, but only if:
- The association was previously loaded
- Or you called size previously
- But only if the size was 0 when you called it
This ensures that the counter is appropriately updated in memory.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Only care about its truthiness rather than asserting specific true/false
values. If we need to check for the return value in particular, there will
be a test for that.
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Fixed custom validation context bug for child associations
|