| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Follow up of 03d3f036.
Some of `respond_to?` were replaced to `respond_to_missing?` in 03d3f036.
But the visibility is still public. It should be private.
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
association saved in the callback
Related #18155, #26661, 268a5bb, #27434, #27442, and #28599.
Originally #18155 was introduced for preventing double insertion caused
by the after save callback. But it was caused the before save issue
(#26661). 268a5bb fixed #26661, but it was caused the performance
regression (#27434). #27442 added new record to `target` before calling
callbacks for fixing #27434. But it was caused double firing before save
callback (#28599). We cannot add new object to `target` before saving
the object.
This is improving #18155 to only track callbacks after `save`.
Fixes #28599.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
privileges (take 2)
Re-create https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/21233
eeac6151a5 was reverted (127509c071b4) because it breaks tests.
----------------
ref: 72c1557254
- We must use `authors` fixture with `author_addresses` because of its foreign key constraint.
- Tests require PostgreSQL >= 9.4.2 because it had a bug about `ALTER CONSTRAINTS` and fixed in 9.4.2.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since b644964b `ActiveRecord::Relation` includes `Enumerable` so
delegating `collect`, `all?`, and `include?` are also unneeded.
`collect` without block returns `Enumerable` without preloading by that.
We should use `load` rather than `collect` for force loading.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The `select` in `QueryMethods` is also an enumerable method.
Enumerable methods with block should delegate to `records` on
`CollectionProxy`, not `scope`.
Fixes #28348.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I incorrectly changed behavior of `dup`. Reading the original issue I
thought that `dup` should retain the original contents of the record
and it's associations but it is in fact supposed to be a copy as if a
record had been reinitialized.
This reverts commit ca8c21df0fdbf1f03ba2f7fb16b39c3282dc1be0.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In Rails 3.2 dupping a `CollectionProxy` would dup it's `load_target` as
well. That functionality has been broken since the release of Rails 4.0.
I hit this in an application upgrade and wondered why duplicating a
CollectionProxy and assigning it to a variable stopped working.
When calling `dup` on a `CollectionProxy` only the owner (ex.
topic) was getting duplicated and the `load_target` would remain in tact
with it's original object ID. Dupping the `load_target` is useful for performing
a logging operation after records have been destroyed in a method.
For example:
```
def transfer_operation
saved_replies = topic.replies
topic.replies.clear
saved_replies.each do |reply|
user.update_replies_count!
end
end
```
This change adds a `initialize_dup` method that performs a `deep_dup` on
the `@associatiation` so that the `load_target` is dupped as well.
Fixes #17117
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
Delegate to `scope` rather than `merge!` for collection proxy
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Because merging the association scope was removed.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
mtsmfm/disable-referential-integrity-without-superuser-privileges"
This reverts commit eeac6151a55cb7d5f799e1ae33aa64a839cbc3aa, reversing
changes made to 5c40239d3104543e70508360d27584a3e4dc5baf.
Reason: Broke the isolated tests.
https://travis-ci.org/rails/rails/builds/188721346
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
mtsmfm/disable-referential-integrity-without-superuser-privileges
Use `SET CONSTRAINTS` for `disable_referential_integrity` without superuser privileges
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
privileges
ref: 72c1557254
- We must use `authors` fixture with `author_addresses` because of its foreign key constraint.
- Tests require PostgreSQL >= 9.4.2 because it had a bug about `ALTER CONSTRAINTS` and fixed in 9.4.2.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
provided.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| | |
Add a record to target before any callbacks loads the record
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
`append_record` was added at 15ddd51 for not double adding the record.
But adding `append_record` (checking `@target.include?(record)`) caused
performance regression #27434. Instead of checking not double adding the
record, add a record to target before any callbacks loads the record.
Fixes #27434.
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently if `CollectionProxy` has more than one new record,
`CollectionProxy#uniq` result is incorrect.
And `CollectionProxy#uniq` was aliased to `distinct` in a1bb6c8b06db.
But the `uniq` method and the `SELECT DISTINCT` method are different
methods. The doc in `CollectionProxy` is for the `SELECT DISTINCT`
method, not for the `uniq` method.
Therefore, reverting the alias in `CollectionProxy` to fix the
inconsistency and to have the both methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Fixes TypeError when cache counter value equals nil
* Test case for counter cache on unloaded has_many association
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- CollectionAssociation#select was removed in
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/25989 in favor of
QueryMethods#select but it caused a regression when passing arguments
to select and a block.
- This used to work earlier in Rails 4.2 and Rails 5. See gist
https://gist.github.com/prathamesh-sonpatki/a7df922273473a77dfbc742a4be4b618.
- This commit restores the behavior of Rails 4.2 and Rails 5.0.0 to
allow passing arguments and block at the same time but also deprecates
it.
- Because, these arguments do not have any effect on the output of
select when select is used with a block.
- Updated documentation to remove the example passing arguments and
block at the same time to `CollectionProxy#select`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was caused by 6d0d83a33f59d9415685852cf77818c41e2e2700. While the
bug it's trying to fix is handled if the association is loaded in an
after_(create|save) callback, it doesn't handle any cases that load the
association before the persistence takes place (validation, or before_*
filters). Instead of caring about the timing of persistence, we can just
ensure that we're not double adding the record instead.
The test from that commit actually broke, but it was not because the bug
has been re-introduced. It was because `Bulb` in our test suite is doing
funky things that look like STI but isn't STI, so equality comparison
didn't happen as the loaded model was of a different class.
Fixes #26661.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
assert [1, 3].includes?(2) fails with unhelpful "Asserting failed" message
assert_includes [1, 3], 2 fails with "Expected [1, 3] to include 2" which makes it easier to debug and more obvious what went wrong
|
|\
| |
| | |
Fix inconsistent the signature of finder methods for collection association
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
`#second`, `#third`, etc finder methods was added in 03855e790de2224519f55382e3c32118be31eeff.
But the signature of these methods is inconsistent with the original
finder methods. And also the signature of `#first` and `#last` methods
is different from the original. This commit fixes the inconsistency.
|
|/
|
|
| |
Otherwise CollectionProxy's bang methdos cannot respect dirty target.
|
|\
| |
| | |
When calling association.find RecordNotFound is now raised with the s…
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
argument as when we do it in Record.find (primary_key, id and model).
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
`CollectionProxy#take` should respect dirty target
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| | |
`#first`, `#second`, ..., `#last` methods respects dirty target. But
`#take` doesn't respect it. This commit fixes the inconsistent behavior.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Style/SpaceBeforeBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideHashLiteralBraces
Fix all violations in the repository.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
|
|
|
| |
These test cases tests exactly mutating loaded target.
|
|
|
|
| |
This is not a test case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
association scope
Fixes #25732.
|
|
|
|
| |
`HasManyAssociationsTest#test_do_not_call_callbacks_for_delete_all`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ruby 2.4 unifies Fixnum and Bignum into Integer: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12005
* Forward compat with new unified Integer class in Ruby 2.4+.
* Backward compat with separate Fixnum/Bignum in Ruby 2.2 & 2.3.
* Drops needless Fixnum distinction in docs, preferring Integer.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When same association is loaded in the model creation callback
The new object is inserted into association twice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
initialize_attributes
If argument of `build_record` has key and value which is same as
default value of database, we should also except the key from
`create_scope` in `initialize_attributes`.
Because at first `build_record` initialize record object with argument
of `build_record`, then assign attributes derived from Association's scope.
In this case `record.changed` does not include the key, which value is
same as default value of database, so we should add the key to except list.
Fix #21893.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With `unscope!` called last, it undoes `where` constraints of the same
value when the `where` is chained after the `unscope`. This is what a
`rewhere` does. This is undesirable behavior.
The included tests demonstrate both the `unscope(...).where(...)`
behavior as well as the direct use of `rewhere(...)`.
This is in reference to #21955.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When I originally reviewed the #20317, I believe these changes were
present, but it appears that it was later updated so that they were
removed. Since Travis hadn't re-run the build, this slipped through.
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
`restrict_with_error` message will now respect owner’s human name
|
|/
|
|
| |
locale [kuboon & Ronak Jangir]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current implementation has a lot of utility methods that accept
reflection call a lot of methods on it and exit.
E.g. has_counter_cache?(reflection)
It causes confusion and inability to cache result of the method even
through it always returns the same result for the same reflection
object.
It can be done easier without access to the association context
by moving code into reflection itself.
e.g. reflection.has_counter_cache?
Reflection is less complex object than association so moving code there
automatically makes it simplier to understand.
|