| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently reflections keeps the order when first added even if when
redefining association. As a result of the order, redefining through
association which use newly added association will raise
`HasManyThroughOrderError`. We need to redefine reflection order as well
when redefining association.
Fixes #31068.
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow up of #31432.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`exists?`
This test covers the case of 02da8aea.
Previously `exists?` was always eager-loading the includes values. But
now it is eager-loaded only when necessary since 07a611e0.
So the case of the eager-loading had not covered in the test.
|
|
|
|
| |
Because this is not a test case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If `reflection_scope.where_clause` is not empty, `through_scope` should
be joined the source association. But if `values[:references]` in
`reflection_scope` is empty, the source association will not be joined.
It should use `source_reflection.table_name` in that case.
Fixes #22535.
Closes #28763.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If `reflection_scope.where_clause` is not empty, `through_scope` should
be joined the source association. But if the through association doesn't
have explicit `:source`, `options[:source]` will be nil and
`scope.includes_values` will also be empty. It should use
`source_reflection.name` rather than `options[:source]`.
Fixed by a26cff3c1235c61cd0135bed4ef63d7be452b458.
Fixes #11078.
Fixes #26129.
Closes #14312.
Closes #29155.
Closes #29841.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This regression was caused by caa178c1. The block for
`set_inverse_instance` should also be passed to join dependency.
Fixes #30402.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #28324.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 3420a14590c0e6915d8b6c242887f74adb4120f9, reversing
changes made to afb66a5a598ce4ac74ad84b125a5abf046dcf5aa.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
These `assert_nothing_raised` are covered by following assertions.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #29025.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`assert_raise` does not check error message. However, in some tests,
it seems like expecting error message checking with `assert_raise`.
Instead of specifying an error message in `assert_raise`, modify to use
another assert to check the error message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are followups for 307065f959f2b34bdad16487bae906eb3bfeaf28,
but TBH I'm personally not very much confortable with this style.
Maybe we could override assert_equal in our test_helper not to warn?
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
assert [1, 3].includes?(2) fails with unhelpful "Asserting failed" message
assert_includes [1, 3], 2 fails with "Expected [1, 3] to include 2" which makes it easier to debug and more obvious what went wrong
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Preserve readonly flag only for readonly association
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes #24093
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Style/SpaceBeforeBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideHashLiteralBraces
Fix all violations in the repository.
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`construct_relation_for_association_calculations` pass a string value to
`construct_join_dependency` when setting a string value in `from`.
It should not pass a string value, but always `joins_values`.
Related #14834, #19452.
Fixes #24193.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently `exists?` does some hackery where it assumes that we can join
onto anything that we passed to `eager_load` or `includes`, which
doesn't work if we are joining onto a polymorphic association.
Actually figuring out if we want to include something would require
knowledge deep within the join dependency module, which is hard to pull
up. The simplest solution is just to pass a flag down that says we're
not actually going to try to eager load any of the data. It's not the
solution I'd like, but that code really needs to be untangled before we
can do much with it.
This is another attempt at 6d5b1fd which should address the concerns
that led to reverting it in 4ecabed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes #23934.
This is a forward port of ac832a43b4d026dbad28fed196d2de69ec9928ac
Previously the scope of all associations with extensions were wrapped in
an instance dependent proc. This made it impossible to preload such
associations.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Honour joining model order in `has_many :through` associations when
eager loading
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
association when eager loading.
Previously, eager loading a `has_many :through` association with no
defined order would return the records in the natural order of the
database. Now, these records will be returned in the order that the
joining record is returned, in case there is a defined order there.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
methyl/fix-includes-for-groupped-association"
This reverts commit 537ac7d6ade61e95f2b70685ff2236b7de965bab, reversing
changes made to 9c9c54abe08d86967efd3dcac1d65158a0ff74ea.
Reason:
The way we preload associations will change the meaning of GROUP BY
operations. This is illustrated in the SQL generated by the added
test (failing on PG):
Association Load:
D, [2015-12-21T12:26:07.169920 #26969] DEBUG -- : Post Load (0.7ms) SELECT "posts".* FROM "posts" LEFT JOIN comments ON comments.post_id = posts.id WHERE "posts"."author_id" = $1 GROUP BY posts.id ORDER BY SUM(comments.tags_count) [["author_id", 1]]
Preload:
D, [2015-12-21T12:26:07.128305 #26969] DEBUG -- : Post Load (1.3ms) SELECT "posts".* FROM "posts" LEFT JOIN comments ON comments.post_id = posts.id WHERE "posts"."author_id" IN (1, 2, 3) GROUP BY posts.id ORDER BY SUM(comments.tags_count)
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Pass group values when including association
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fixes problem when added `group()` in association scope was lost
in eager loaded association.
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | | |
yuroyoro/fix_performance_regression_of_preloading_has_many_through_relation
Fix #12537 performance regression when preloading has_many_through association
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| | |
For performance, Avoid instantiate CollectionProxy.
Fixes #12537
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is part of a refactoring to make it easier to allow `order` to use
sanitize like just about everything else on relation. The deleted test
doesn't give any reasoning as to why passing `nil` to `order` needs to
be supported, and it's rather nonsensical. I can almost see allowing an
empty string being passed (though I'm tempted to just disallow it...)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
akihiro17/fix-preload-association""
This reverts commit 5243946017d09afff4d70d273b0fcdfd41a4b22a.
This fixes an issue with the build where tests would fail on mysql and
postgresql due to different ordering.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 6dc6a0b17cfaf7cb6aa2b1c163b6ca141b538a8e, reversing
changes made to ec94f00ba3cf250eb54fc5b7a5e3ed4b90164f34.
This pull request broke the build.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We should call `scope.order!` and set `scope.reordering_value` to `true` if :reordering values are specified
Fixes #21886
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This is a separate commit, as it is not just a changelog conflict. Want
to point out the changes in the code
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
use only object_id instead parent class and parent id
test cases
assert_equal
use table name in references
fix minor problems
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Correct error message in Standard American english and add a test cas…
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
See #9683 for the reasons we switched to `distinct`.
Here is the discussion that triggered the actual deprecation #20198.
`uniq`, `uniq!` and `uniq_value` are still around.
They will be removed in the next minor release after Rails 5.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
| |
- Eager loading was not working for the default_scope (class method)
for 'find' & 'find_by' methods.
- Fixed these by adding a new check 'respond_to?(:default_scope)'.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
|