| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The `unboundable?` behaves like the `infinite?`.
```ruby
inf = Topic.predicate_builder.build_bind_attribute(:id, Float::INFINITY)
inf.infinite? # => 1
oob = Topic.predicate_builder.build_bind_attribute(:id, 9999999999999999999999999999999)
oob.unboundable? # => 1
inf = Topic.predicate_builder.build_bind_attribute(:id, -Float::INFINITY)
inf.infinite? # => -1
oob = Topic.predicate_builder.build_bind_attribute(:id, -9999999999999999999999999999999)
oob.unboundable? # => -1
```
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This slightly change the code in the Arel to allow +/-INFINITY as open
ended since the Active Record expects that behavior. See 5ecbeda.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Arel: Implemented DB-aware NULL-safe comparison
* Fixed where clause inversion for NULL-safe comparison
* Renaming "null_safe_eq" to "is_not_distinct_from", "null_safe_not_eq" to "is_distinct_from"
[Dmytro Shteflyuk + Rafael Mendonça França]
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MySQL supports DELETE with LIMIT and ORDER BY.
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/delete.html
Before:
```
Post Destroy (1.0ms) DELETE FROM `posts` WHERE `posts`.`id` IN (SELECT `id` FROM (SELECT `posts`.`id` FROM `posts` WHERE `posts`.`author_id` = ? ORDER BY `posts`.`id` ASC LIMIT ?) __active_record_temp) [["author_id", 1], ["LIMIT", 1]]
```
After:
```
Post Destroy (0.4ms) DELETE FROM `posts` WHERE `posts`.`author_id` = ? ORDER BY `posts`.`id` ASC LIMIT ? [["author_id", 1], ["LIMIT", 1]]
```
|
| |
|
|
| |
This reverts commit a1b72178714fbf0033fe076b7e51f57eff152bdd.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Initially, `TOP` was introduced to support `limit` for MSSQL database.
Unlike PostgreSQL/MySQL/SQLite, MSSQL does not have native `LIMIT`/`OFFSET` support.
The commit adding `TOP` is 1a246f71616cf246a75ef6cbdb56032e43d4e643.
However, it figured out that `TOP` implementation was weak and it's not sufficient
to also support `OFFSET`, then `TOP` was substituted with
`ROW_NUMBER()` subquery in be48ed3071fd6524d0145c4ad3faeb4aafe3eda3.
This is a well known trick in MSSQL -
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2135418/equivalent-of-limit-and-offset-for-sql-server.
So now we don't need this `visit_Arel_Nodes_Top` at all.
It does nothing useful but also adds an extra space after `SELECT` when `LIMIT` is being
used for **any** database.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The writer was added during Arel refactoring to pass Active Record
tests at 7a29220.
That is no longer used since 846832a.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Not required after https://github.com/rails/arel/pull/449
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
