| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This bug occurs when an attribute of an ActiveRecord model is an
ActiveRecord::Type::Integer type or a ActiveRecord::Type::Decimal type (or any
other type that includes the ActiveRecord::Type::Numeric module. When the value
of the attribute is negative and is set to the same negative value, it is marked
as changed.
Take the following example of a Person model with the integer attribute age:
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
# age :integer(4)
end
The following will produce the error:
person = Person.new(age: -1)
person.age = -1
person.changes
=> { "age" => [-1, -1] }
person.age_changed?
=> true
The problematic line is here:
module ActiveRecord
module Type
module Numeric
...
def non_numeric_string?(value)
# 'wibble'.to_i will give zero, we want to make sure
# that we aren't marking int zero to string zero as
# changed.
value.to_s !~ /\A\d+\.?\d*\z/
end
end
end
end
The regex match doesn't accept numbers with a leading '-'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We previously only did this if the old value was zero, to make sure
numericality validations run and failed if the user gave 'wibble' as the
value, which would be type cast to 0. However, numericality validations
will fail if there are any non-numeric characters in the string, so 5 ->
'5wibble' should also be marked as changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`Type::Integer.new.type_cast('') # => nil`, we do not need a special
case to handle this, `nil => ''` already returns false. The only case we
need to handle is `0 => 'wibble'` should be changed, while `0 => '0'`
should not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The definition of `write_attribute` in dirty checking ultimately leads
to the columns calling `type_cast` on the value to perform the
comparison. However, this is a potentially expensive computation that we
cache when it occurs in `read_attribute`. The only case that we need the
non-type-cast form is for numeric, so we pass that through as well
(something I'm looking to remove in the future).
This also reduces the number of places that manually access various
stages in an attribute's type casting lifecycle, which will aid in one
of the larger refactorings that I'm working on.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The types know more about what is going on than the dirty module. Let's
ask them!
|
|
`ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::Type::Value` =>
`ActiveRecord::Type::Value`
|