| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We sometimes say "✂️ newline after `private`" in a code review (e.g.
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/18546#discussion_r23188776,
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/34832#discussion_r244847195).
Now `Layout/EmptyLinesAroundAccessModifier` cop have new enforced style
`EnforcedStyle: only_before` (https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/pull/7059).
That cop and enforced style will reduce the our code review cost.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
kamipo/fix_leaking_scope_on_relation_create"
This reverts commit b67d5c6dedbf033515a96a95d24d085bf99a0d07, reversing
changes made to 2e018361c7c51e36d1d98bf770b7456d78dee68b.
Reason: #35186 may cause that silently leaking information when people
upgrade the app.
We need deprecation first before making this.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Relation is not best place to do this.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't use `false` as special value to skip to find inherited scope, we
could use `skip_inherited_scope = true`, and move `_scoping` back on
Relation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Active Record uses `scoping` to delegate to named scopes from relations
for propagating the chaining source scope. It was needed to restore the
source scope in named scopes, but it was caused undesired behavior that
pollute all class level querying methods.
Example:
```ruby
class Topic < ActiveRecord::Base
scope :toplevel, -> { where(parent_id: nil) }
scope :children, -> { where.not(parent_id: nil) }
scope :has_children, -> { where(id: Topic.children.select(:parent_id)) }
end
# Works as expected.
Topic.toplevel.where(id: Topic.children.select(:parent_id))
# Doesn't work due to leaking `toplevel` to `Topic.children`.
Topic.toplevel.has_children
```
Since #29301, the receiver in named scopes has changed from the model
class to the chaining source scope, so the polluting class level
querying methods is no longer required for that purpose.
Fixes #14003.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 3420a14590c0e6915d8b6c242887f74adb4120f9, reversing
changes made to afb66a5a598ce4ac74ad84b125a5abf046dcf5aa.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This regression was caused by #23004.
If STI subclass is using scoping in parent class scoping,
`current_scope` in subclass is never restored.
I fixed to restore `current_scope` to previous value correctly.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While the commit message (and changelog example) in
5e0b555b453ea2ca36986c111512627d806101e7 talked about sibling classes,
the added test had a child ignore its parent's scoping, which seems less
reasonable.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The focus of this change is to make the API more accessible.
References to method and classes should be linked to make it easy to
navigate around.
This patch makes exzessiv use of `rdoc-ref:` to provide more readable
docs. This makes it possible to document `ActiveRecord::Base#save` even
though the method is within a separate module
`ActiveRecord::Persistence`. The goal here is to bring the API closer to
the actual code that you would write.
This commit only deals with Active Record. The other gems will be
updated accordingly but in different commits. The pass through Active
Record is not completely finished yet. A follow up commit will change
the spots I haven't yet had the time to update.
/cc @fxn
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead use .scope_attributes? consistently in ActiveRecord to check whether
there are attributes currently associated with the scope.
Move the implementation of .scope_attributes? and .scope_attributes to
ActiveRecord::Scoping because they don't particularly have to do specifically
with Named scopes and their only dependency, in the case of
.scope_attributes?, and only caller, in the case of .scope_attributes is
contained in Scoping.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It looks like the only reason `current_scope` was thread local on
`base_class` instead of `self` is to ensure that when we call a named
scope created with a proc on the parent class, it correctly uses the
default scope of the subclass. The reason this wasn't happening was
because the proc captured `self` as the parent class, and we're not
actually defining a real method. Using `instance_exec` fixes the
problem.
Fixes #18806
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 9a1abedcdeecd9464668695d4f9c1d55a2fd9332, reversing
changes made to c72d6c91a7c0c2dc81cc857a1d6db496e84e0065.
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
activerecord/test/models/comment.rb
This change break integration with activerecord-deprecated_finders so
I'm reverting until we find a way to make it work with this gem.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Changed the call to a scope block to be evaluated with instance_eval.
The result is that ScopeRegistry can use the actual class instead of base_class when
caching scopes so queries made by classes with a common ancestor won't leak scopes.
|
| |
|
| |
Move serialization dirty into serialization.rb
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Existing code was delegating to the instance with delegate
macro calls, or invoking the instance method to reach
the object and call its instance methods.
But the point is to have a clean class-level interface where
the thread local instance is hidden in the implementation.
References #11c6973.
References #10198.
|
| |
|
|
| |
PerThreadRegistry module.
|
| |
|
|
| |
current ScopeRegister object.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
current_scope and ignore_default_scope locals are brought together under
a registry object.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See #9869 and #9929.
The problem arises from the following example:
class Project < ActiveRecord::Base
scope :completed, -> { where completed: true }
end
class MajorProject < Project
end
When calling:
MajorProject.where(tasks_count: 10).completed
This expands to:
MajorProject.where(tasks_count: 10).scoping {
MajorProject.completed
}
However the lambda for the `completed` scope is defined on Project. This
means that when it is called, `self` is Project rather than
MajorProject. So it expands to:
MajorProject.where(tasks_count: 10).scoping {
Project.where(completed: true)
}
Since the scoping was applied on MajorProject, and not Project, this
fails to apply the tasks_count condition.
The solution is to make scoping apply across STI classes. I am slightly
concerned about the possible side-effects of this, but no tests fail and
it seems ok. I guess we'll see.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
active_record_deprecated_finders
|
| | |
|
| |
|
