| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Tests should still pass after removing `require 'active_support/deprecation'`
from these files since the related deprecations have been removed.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a regression 4.0 -> 4.1 fix.
In 4.1.0 Relation#join is delegated to Arel#SelectManager.
In 4.0 series it is delegated to Array#join
This patch puts back the behaviour of 4.0
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #14752
Select mimics the block interface of arrays, but does not mock the
block interface for select!. This change moves the api to be a
private method, _select!.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change was necessary because the whitelist wouldn't work.
It would be painful for users trying to update their applications.
This blacklist intent to prevent odd bugs and confusion in code that call mutator
methods directely on the `Relation`.
|
| |
|
|
| |
* interpreted as a argument prefix
|
| |
|
|
| |
won't last - aim to switch back to a blacklist for mutator methods.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The primary means of returning results for Array bang methods is to modify
the array in-place. When you call these methods on a relation, that
array is created, modified, and then thrown away. Only the secondary
return value is exposed to the caller.
Removing this delegation is a straight-forward way to reduce user error
by forcing callers to first explicitly call #to_a in order to expose
the array to be acted on by the bang method.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We discussed that the auto explain feature is rarely used.
This PR removes only the automatic explain. You can still display
the explain output for any given relation using `ActiveRecord::Relation#explain`.
As a side-effect this should also fix the connection problem during
asset compilation (#9385). The auto explain initializer in the `ActiveRecord::Railtie`
forced a connection.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
* dependencies/autoload
* concern
* deprecation
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary of the changes:
* Add thread_safe gem.
* Use thread safe cache for digestor caching.
* Replace manual synchronization with ThreadSafe::Cache in Relation::Delegation.
* Replace @attribute_method_matchers_cache Hash with ThreadSafe::Cache.
* Use TS::Cache to avoid the synchronisation overhead on listener retrieval.
* Replace synchronisation with TS::Cache usage.
* Use a preallocated array for performance/memory reasons.
* Update the controllers cache to the new AS::Dependencies::ClassCache API.
The original @controllers cache no longer makes much sense after @tenderlove's
changes in 7b6bfe84f3 and f345e2380c.
* Use TS::Cache in the connection pool to avoid locking overhead.
* Use TS::Cache in ConnectionHandler.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
At present, ActiveRecord::Delegation compiles delegation methods on a
global basis. The compiled methods apply to all subsequent Relation
instances. This creates several problems:
1) After Post.all.recent has been called, User.all.respond_to?(:recent)
will be true, even if User.all.recent will actually raise an error due
to no User.recent method existing. (See #8080.)
2) Depending on the AR class, the delegation should do different things.
For example, if a Post.zip method exists, then Post.all.zip should call
it. But this will then result in User.zip being called by a subsequent
User.all.zip, even if User.zip does not exist, when in fact
User.all.zip should call User.all.to_a.zip. (There are various
variants of this problem.)
We are creating these compiled delegations in order to avoid method
missing and to avoid repeating logic on each invocation.
One way of handling these issues is to add additional checks in various
places to ensure we're doing the "right thing". However, this makes the
compiled methods signficantly slower. In which case, there's almost no
point in avoiding method_missing at all. (See #8127 for a proposed
solution which takes this approach.)
This is an alternative approach which involves creating a subclass of
ActiveRecord::Relation for each AR class represented. So, with this
patch, Post.all.class != User.all.class. This means that the delegations
are compiled for and only apply to a single AR class. A compiled method
for Post.all will not be invoked from User.all.
This solves the above issues without incurring significant performance
penalties. It's designed to be relatively seamless, however the downside
is a bit of complexity and potentially confusion for a user who thinks
that Post.all and User.all should be instances of the same class.
Benchmark
---------
require 'active_record'
require 'benchmark/ips'
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
establish_connection adapter: 'sqlite3', database: ':memory:'
connection.create_table :posts
def self.omg
:omg
end
end
relation = Post.all
Benchmark.ips do |r|
r.report('delegation') { relation.omg }
r.report('constructing') { Post.all }
end
Before
------
Calculating -------------------------------------
delegation 4392 i/100ms
constructing 4780 i/100ms
-------------------------------------------------
delegation 144235.9 (±27.7%) i/s - 663192 in 5.038075s
constructing 182015.5 (±21.2%) i/s - 850840 in 5.005364s
After
-----
Calculating -------------------------------------
delegation 6677 i/100ms
constructing 6260 i/100ms
-------------------------------------------------
delegation 166828.2 (±34.2%) i/s - 754501 in 5.001430s
constructing 116575.5 (±18.6%) i/s - 563400 in 5.036690s
Comments
--------
Bear in mind that the standard deviations in the above are huge, so we
can't compare the numbers too directly. However, we can conclude that
Relation construction has become a little slower (as we'd expect), but
not by a huge huge amount, and we can still construct a large number of
Relations quite quickly.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Two threads may be in method_missing at the same time. If so, they might
both try to define the same delegator method.
Such a situation probably wouldn't result in a particularly spectacular
bug as one method would probably just be overridden by an identical
method, but it could cause warnings to pop up. (It could be worse if
method definition is non-atomic in a particular implementation.)
(We will also need this mutex shortly anyway, see #8127.)
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
method missing calls for rofscale.
|
