| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
guides/source/association_basics.md
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As shown below, we should use <tt>...</tt> for string literal
```
$ echo "+'id'+" | rdoc --pipe
<p>+'id'+</p>
$ echo "<tt>'id'</tt>" | rdoc --pipe
<p><code>'id'</code></p>
```
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When updating an associated record via nested attribute hashes the
reject_if proc could be bypassed if the _destroy flag was set in the
attribute hash and allow_destroy was set to false.
The fix is to only short-circuit if the _destroy flag is set and the
option allow_destroy is set to true. It also fixes an issue where
a new record wasn't created if _destroy was set and the option
allow_destroy was set to false.
CVE-2015-7577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound modified to store model name, primary_key
and id of the caller model. It allows the catcher of this exception to make
a better decision to what to do with it. For example consider this simple
example:
class SomeAbstractController < ActionController::Base
rescue_from ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound, with: :redirect_to_404
private def redirect_to_404(e)
return redirect_to(posts_url) if e.model == 'Post'
raise
end
end
|
|
|
|
| |
collection associations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since nested hashes are also instances of
`ActionController::Parameters`, and we're explicitly looking to work
with a hash for nested attributes, this caused breakage in several
points.
This is the minimum viable fix for the issue (and one that I'm not
terribly fond of). I can't think of a better place to handle this at the
moment. I'd prefer to use some sort of solution that doesn't special
case AC::Parameters, but we can't use something like `to_h` or `to_a`
since `Enumerable` adds both.
While I've added a trivial test case for verifying this fix in
isolation, we really need better integration coverage to prevent
regressions like this in the future. We don't actually have a lot of
great places for integration coverage at the moment, so I'm deferring it
for now.
Fixes #20922.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
skip]
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Collection associations would have already been validated, but singular
associations were not.
Fixes #18735.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These callbacks will already have been defined when the association was
built. The check against `reflection.autosave` happens at call time, not
at define time, so simply modifying the reflection is sufficient.
Fixes #18704
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I just wasted an absurd amount of time trying to figure out why my model
wasn't being deleted even though I was setting `_destroy` to true like
the instructions said. Making the documentation a little bit clear so
that someone like me doesn't waste their time in future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In some cases there is a difference between the two, we should always
be doing one or the other. For convenience, `type_cast` is still a
private method on type, so new types that do not need different behavior
don't need to implement two methods, but it has been moved to private so
it cannot be used accidentally.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::Type::Value` =>
`ActiveRecord::Type::Value`
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now the internal reflections will hold a reference to its public
representation, so when the outside world calls `Account.reflection` we
can build a list of public reflections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix habtm reflection
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
activerecord/lib/active_record/counter_cache.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/reflection.rb
activerecord/test/cases/reflection_test.rb
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
records, and don't bother updating the association if the update is going to be rejected anyway.
This requires adding a `skip_callbacks` argument to `#add_to_target`
so that we don't call the callbacks multiple times in this case,
which is functionally an application of existing association data,
rather than an addition of a new record to the association.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Issue #1: :before_add callback is called when nested attributes assignment assigns to existing record if the association is not yet loaded
Issue #2: Nested Attributes assignment does not affect the record in the association target when callback triggers loading of the association
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of using +inverse_of: false+ option. Changing the documentation and
adding a CHANGELOG entry for the automatic inverse detection feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the results. Added tests to check to make sure that inverse associations are
automatically found when has_many, has_one, or belongs_to associations
are defined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
assignment
For one-to-one nested associations, if you build the new (in-memory)
child object yourself before assignment, then the NestedAttributes
module will not overwrite it, e.g.:
class Member < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :avatar
accepts_nested_attributes_for :avatar
def avatar
super || build_avatar(width: 200)
end
end
member = Member.new
member.avatar_attributes = {icon: 'sad'}
member.avatar.width # => 200
|
|
|
|
| |
method to signify an exception possibly being raised.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Document the possibility to use a hash of hashes for nested attributes for a one-to-many association (in addition to the documented possibility to use an array of hashes).
|
|
|
|
| |
which make it clearer about what's going on.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
actionpack/lib/action_controller/metal/mime_responds.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb
guides/source/working_with_javascript_in_rails.md
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In the end I think the pain of implementing this seamlessly was not
worth the gain provided.
The intention was that it would allow plain ruby objects that might not
live in your main application to be subclassed and have persistence
mixed in. But I've decided that the benefit of doing that is not worth
the amount of complexity that the implementation introduced.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 83846838252397b3781eed165ca301e05db39293.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I think it's going to be too much pain to try to transition the
:active_record load hook from executing against Base to executing
against Model.
For example, after Model is included in Base, and modules included in
Model will no longer get added to the ancestors of Base.
So plugins which wish to be compatible with both Model and Base should
use the :active_record_model load hook which executes *before* Base gets
loaded.
In general, ActiveRecord::Model is an advanced feature at the moment and
probably most people will continue to inherit from ActiveRecord::Base
for the time being.
|
|
|
|
| |
reference to mass_assignment options
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
#accepts_nested_attributes_for
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Get rid of ActiveModel::Configuration, make better use of
ActiveSupport::Concern + class_attribute, etc.
|