| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When subclassing abstract_class table_name should be always computed
based on class name, no matter if superclass is subclassing base
or another abstract_class. So:
class FirstAbstract < ActiveRecord::Base
self.abstract_class = true
end
class SecondAbstract < FirstAbstract
self.abstract_class = true
end
class Post < SecondAbstract
self.table_name #=> 'posts' (not 'second_abstracts')
end
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the 'top level' connection, inherited by any models that include
ActiveRecord::Model or inherit from ActiveRecord::Base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The problem: We need to be able to specify configuration in a way that
can be inherited to models that include ActiveRecord::Model. So it is
no longer sufficient to put 'top level' config on ActiveRecord::Base,
but we do want configuration specified on ActiveRecord::Base and
descendants to continue to work.
So we need something like class_attribute that can be defined on a
module but that is inherited when ActiveRecord::Model is included.
The solution: added ActiveModel::Configuration module which provides a
config_attribute macro. It's a bit specific hence I am not putting this
in Active Support or making it a 'public API' at present.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Allows two models to use the same table but have different primary keys.
|
|
|