| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Keying these hashes by klass causes reloadable classes to never get
freed. Thanks to @thedarkone for pointing this out in
the comments on 221571beb6b4bb7437989bdefaf421f993ab6002.
This doesn't seem to make a massive difference to performance.
Benchmark
---------
require 'active_record'
require 'benchmark/ips'
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
establish_connection adapter: 'sqlite3', database: ':memory:'
end
GC.disable
Benchmark.ips(20) do |r|
r.report { Post.connection }
end
Before
------
Calculating -------------------------------------
5632 i/100ms
-------------------------------------------------
218671.0 (±1.9%) i/s - 4364800 in 19.969401s
After
-----
Calculating -------------------------------------
8743 i/100ms
-------------------------------------------------
206525.9 (±17.8%) i/s - 4039266 in 19.992590s
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather than just changing it and hoping for the best.
Requested by @jeremy:
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/ba1544d71628abff2777c9c514142d7e9a159111#commitcomment-2106059
|
|
|
|
| |
message
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This comment is not valid since that `if` is there to make possible to
do:
remove_index :users, :name
Instead of:
remove_index :users, column: :name
What is a valid use case.
[ci skip]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was there due historical reasons since
7dc45818dc43c163700efc9896a0f3feafa31138 to give the user the
possibility to create unique indexes passing "UNIQUE" as the third
argument
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes #8104
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
actionpack/lib/action_controller/metal/mime_responds.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb
guides/source/working_with_javascript_in_rails.md
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the end I think the pain of implementing this seamlessly was not
worth the gain provided.
The intention was that it would allow plain ruby objects that might not
live in your main application to be subclassed and have persistence
mixed in. But I've decided that the benefit of doing that is not worth
the amount of complexity that the implementation introduced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When inserting new records, only the fields which have been changed
from the defaults will actually be included in the INSERT statement.
The other fields will be populated by the database.
This is more efficient, and also means that it will be safe to
remove database columns without getting subsequent errors in running
app processes (so long as the code in those processes doesn't
contain any references to the removed column).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If your database supports setting the isolation level for a transaction,
you can set it like so:
Post.transaction(isolation: :serializable) do
# ...
end
Valid isolation levels are:
* `:read_uncommitted`
* `:read_committed`
* `:repeatable_read`
* `:serializable`
You should consult the documentation for your database to understand the
semantics of these different levels:
* http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/transaction-iso.html
* https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/set-transaction.html
An `ActiveRecord::TransactionIsolationError` will be raised if:
* The adapter does not support setting the isolation level
* You are joining an existing open transaction
* You are creating a nested (savepoint) transaction
The mysql, mysql2 and postgresql adapters support setting the
transaction isolation level. However, support is disabled for mysql
versions below 5, because they are affected by a bug
(http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=39170) which means the isolation level
gets persisted outside the transaction.
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Adds migration and type casting support for PostgreSQL Array datatype
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Having column related schema dumper code in the AbstractAdapter. The
code remains the same, but by placing it in the AbstractAdapter, we can
then overwrite it with Adapter specific methods that will help with
Adapter specific data types.
The goal of moving this code here is to create a new migration key for
PostgreSQL's array type. Since any datatype can be an array, the goal is
to have ':array => true' as a migration option, turning the datatype
into an array. I've implemented this in postgres_ext, the syntax is
shown here: https://github.com/dockyard/postgres_ext#arrays
Adds array migration support
Adds array_test.rb outlining the test cases for array data type
Adds pg_array_parser to Gemfile for testing
Adds pg_array_parser to postgresql_adapter (unused in this commit)
Adds schema dump support for arrays
Adds postgres array type casting support
Updates changelog, adds note for inet and cidr support, which I forgot to add before
Removing debugger, Adds pg_array_parser to JRuby platform
Removes pg_array_parser requirement, creates ArrayParser module used by
PostgreSQLAdapter
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Accidentally checked in commented test code. Fail. >_<
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This method was first seen in 045713ee240fff815edb5962b25d668512649478,
and subsequently reimplemented in
fb2325e35855d62abd2c76ce03feaa3ca7992e4f.
According to @jeremy, this is okay to remove. He thinks it was added
because at the time we didn't have much transaction state to keep track
of, and he viewed it as a hack for us to track it internally, thinking
it was better to ask the connection for the transaction state.
Over the years we have added more and more state to track, a lot of
which is impossible to ask the connection for. So it seems that this is
just a relic of the passed and we will just track the state internally
only.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The caller needs to have knowledge of the rollback either way, so do it
all in the caller (#transaction)
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This avoids us having to manually increment and decrement it.
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
during a"
This reverts commit c24c885209ac2334dc6f798c394a821ee270bec6.
Here's the explanation I just sent to @tenderlove:
Hey,
I've been thinking about about the transaction memory leak thing that we
were discussing.
Example code:
post = nil
Post.transaction do
N.times { post = Post.create }
end
Post.transaction is going to create a real transaction and there will
also be a (savepoint) transaction inside each Post.create.
In an idea world, we'd like all but the last Post instance to be GC'd,
and for the last Post instance to receive its after_commit callback when
Post.transaction returns.
I can't see how this can work using your solution where the Post itself
holds a reference to the transaction it is in; when Post.transaction
returns, control does not switch to any of Post's instance methods, so
it can't trigger the callbacks itself.
What we really want is for the transaction itself to hold weak
references to the objects within the transaction. So those objects can
be GC'd, but if they are not GC'd then the transaction can iterate them
and execute their callbacks.
I've looked into WeakRef implementations that are available. On 1.9.3,
the stdlib weakref library is broken and we shouldn't use it.
There is a better implementation here:
https://github.com/bdurand/ref/blob/master/lib/ref/weak_reference/pure_ruby.rb
We could use that, either by pulling in the gem or just copying the code
in, but it still suffers from the limitation that it uses ObjectSpace
finalizers.
In my testing, this finalizers make GC quite expensive:
https://gist.github.com/3722432
Ruby 2.0 will have a native WeakRef implementation (via
ObjectSpace::WeakMap), hence won't be reliant on finalizers:
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4168
So the ultimate solution will be for everyone to use Ruby 2.0, and for
us to just use ObjectSpace::WeakMap.
In the meantime, we have basically 3 options:
The first is to leave it as it is.
The second is to use a finalizer-based weakref implementation and take
the GC perf hit.
The final option is to store object ids rather than the actual objects.
Then use ObjectSpace._id2ref to deference the objects at the end of the
transaction, if they exist. This won't stop memory use growing within
the transaction, but it'll grow more slowly.
I benchmarked the performance of _id2ref this if the object does or does
not exist: https://gist.github.com/3722550
If it does exist it seems decent, but it's hugely more expensive if it
doesn't, probably because we have to do the rescue nil.
Probably most of the time the objects will exist. However the point of
doing this optimisation is to allow people to create a large number of
objects inside a transaction and have them be GC'd. So for that use
case, we'd be replacing one problem with another. I'm not sure which of
the two problems is worse.
My feeling is that we should just leave this for now and come back to it
when Ruby 2.0 is out.
I'm going to revert your commit because I can't see how it solves this.
Hope you don't mind... if I've misunderstood then let me know!
Jon
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. Unused variable
2. possibly useless use of a variable in
void context
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As a result of different commits, ConnectionPool had become
of two minds about exceptions, sometimes using PoolFullError
and sometimes using ConnectionTimeoutError. In fact, it was
using ConnectionTimeoutError internally, but then recueing
and re-raising as a PoolFullError.
There's no reason for this bifurcation, standardize on
ConnectionTimeoutError, which is the rails2 name and still
accurately describes semantics at this point.
History
In Rails2, ConnectionPool raises a ConnectionTimeoutError if
it can't get a connection within timeout.
Originally in master/rails3, @tenderlove had planned on removing
wait/blocking in connectionpool entirely, at that point he changed
exception to PoolFullError.
But then later wait/blocking came back, but exception remained
PoolFullError.
Then in 02b233556377 pmahoney introduced fair waiting logic, and
brought back ConnectionTimeoutError, introducing the weird bifurcation.
ConnectionTimeoutError accurately describes semantics as of this
point, and is backwards compat with rails2, there's no reason
for PoolFullError to be introduced, and no reason for two
different exception types to be used internally, no reason
to rescue one and re-raise as another. Unify!
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
| |
transaction.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't need separate @class_to_pool and @connection_pool hashes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Loop rather than recurse in retrieve_connection_pool
* Key the hash by class rather than class name. This avoids creating
unnecessary strings.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It has been moved to active_record_deprecated_finders.
Use #to_a instead.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 3dbedd2 added NOT NULL constraints to timestamps.
Commit fcef728 started to revert this, but was incomplete.
With this commit, 3dbedd2 should be fully reverted and
timestamps will no longer default to NOT NULL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For instance, running
rails g migration CreateMediaJoinTable artists musics:uniq
will create a migration with
create_join_table :artists, :musics do |t|
# t.index [:artist_id, :music_id]
t.index [:music_id, :artist_id], unique: true
end
|