| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Data corruption risk: Roll back open transactions when the running thread is killed.
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, Active Record will rescue any errors raised within
after_rollback/after_create callbacks and print them to the
logs. Next versions of rails will not rescue those errors anymore,
and just bubble them up, as the other callbacks.
This adds a opt-in flag to enable that behaviour, of not rescuing
the errors.
Example:
# For not swallow errors in after_commit/after_rollback
config.active_record.errors_in_transactional_callbacks = true
[fixes #13460]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
after_commit should not run in nested transactions, however they should
run once the outermost transaction gets committed. This patch fixes the
problem copying the records from the Savepoint to its parent. So the
RealTransaction will have all records that needs to run callbacks on it.
[fixes #16425]
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use `commit_transaction`/`rollback_transaction` on
`within_new_transaction` method, so they make sure they `pop` the
transaction from the stack before calling the methods `commit`/`rollback`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Transaction class doesnt need to encapsulate the transaction state using
inheritance.
This removes all Transaction subclasses, and let the Transaction object
controls different actions based on its own state. Basically the only
actions would behave differently are `being`,`commit`,`rollback` as they
could act in a savepoint or in a real transaction.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This piece of code was introduced on
67d8bb963d5d51fc644d6b1ca20164efb4cee6d7 , which was calling
`committed?` in the `transaction_state` before calling the `committed!`
method. However on 7386ffc781fca07a0c656db49fdb54678caef809, the
`committed?` check was removed and replaced by a `finalized?`, which
only checks if the state is not nil. Thus we can remove that line.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also add test to assets the savepoint name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a transaction manager per connection, so it can controls the
connection responsibilities.
Delegate transaction methods to transaction_manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The finishing variable on the transaction object was a work-around for
the savepoint name, so after a rollback/commit the savepoint could be
released with the previous name.
related:
9296e6939bcc786149a07dac334267c4035b623a
60c88e64e26682a954f7c8cd6669d409ffffcc8b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a regression (#13744) that was caused by 67d8bb9.
In 67d8bb9, we introduced lazy rollback for records, such that the
record's internal states and attributes are not restored immediately
after a transaction rollback, but deferred until they are first
accessed.
This optimization is only performed when the model does not have any
transactional callbacks (e.g. `after_commit` and `after_create`).
Unfortunately, the models used to test the affected codepaths all
comes with some sort of transactional callbacks. Therefore this
codepath remains largely untested until now and as a result there are
a few issues in the implementation that remains hidden until now.
First, the `sync_with_transaction_state` (or more accurately,
`update_attributes_from_transaction_state`) would perform the
synchronization prematurely before a transaction is finalized (i.e.
comitted or rolled back). As a result, when the actuall rollback
happens, the record will incorrectly assumes that its internal states
match the transaction state, and neglect to perform the restore.
Second, `update_attributes_from_transaction_state` calls `committed!`
in some cases. This in turns checks for the `destroyed?` state which
also requires synchronization with the transaction stae, which causes
an infnite recurrsion.
This fix works by deferring the synchronization until the transaction
has been finalized (addressing the first point), and also unrolled
the `committed!` and `rolledback!` logic in-place (addressing the
second point).
It should be noted that the primary purpose of the `committed!` and
`rolledback!` methods are to trigger the relevant transactional
callbacks. Since this code path is only entered when there are no
transactional callbacks on the model, this shouldn't be necessary. By
unrolling the method calls, the intention here (to restore the states
when necessary) becomes more clear.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
with new transaction state. If AR object has a callback, the callback will be performed immediately (non-lazily) so the transaction still has to keep records with callbacks.
|
|
|
|
| |
new transaction state object upon initialization.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If your database supports setting the isolation level for a transaction,
you can set it like so:
Post.transaction(isolation: :serializable) do
# ...
end
Valid isolation levels are:
* `:read_uncommitted`
* `:read_committed`
* `:repeatable_read`
* `:serializable`
You should consult the documentation for your database to understand the
semantics of these different levels:
* http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/transaction-iso.html
* https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/set-transaction.html
An `ActiveRecord::TransactionIsolationError` will be raised if:
* The adapter does not support setting the isolation level
* You are joining an existing open transaction
* You are creating a nested (savepoint) transaction
The mysql, mysql2 and postgresql adapters support setting the
transaction isolation level. However, support is disabled for mysql
versions below 5, because they are affected by a bug
(http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=39170) which means the isolation level
gets persisted outside the transaction.
|
|
|
|
| |
Accidentally checked in commented test code. Fail. >_<
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The caller needs to have knowledge of the rollback either way, so do it
all in the caller (#transaction)
|
|
|
|
| |
This avoids us having to manually increment and decrement it.
|
|
|