| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Allow aliased attributes to be used in `#update_columns` and `#update`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It should be done only once in `Persistence` module.
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/c83e30da27eafde79164ecb376e8a28ccc8d841f/activerecord/lib/active_record/persistence.rb#L721
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/c83e30da27eafde79164ecb376e8a28ccc8d841f/activerecord/lib/active_record/persistence.rb#L740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`changes_applied` should be called before continuing around callback
chain. Otherwise the mutation tracker returns old value for methods like
`changed`? or `id_in_database` in around callbacks. Also methods depend
on `id_in_database`, like `update_column`, are not working in
`around_create` callbacks.
```
class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base
around_create :around_create_callback
def around_create_callback
...
yield
p id_in_database # => nil
update_column(:generated_column, generate_value) # silently fails
end
...
end
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`after_initialize`
`becomes` creates new object and copies attributes from the receiver. If
new object has mutation tracker which is created in `after_initialize`,
it should be cleared since it is for discarded attributes.
But if the receiver doesn't have mutation tracker yet, it will not be
cleared properly.
It should be cleared regardless of whether the receiver has mutation
tracker or not.
Fixes #32867.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously the documentation for the newly introduced (in 5.1) AR::Dirty
methods was misleading, as it stated the the new methods were aliases
for the old methods. This was false, and caused confusion when the
differences in their implementation became apparent.
This change attempts to describe the behaviour of these methods more
accurately, also noting when they are likely to be useful (i.e. before
or after saving a record).
This change also makes minor updates to consistently format the
documentation of this API, in accordance with the API Documentation
Guidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`changed_attribute_names_to_save` is called in `keys_for_partial_write`,
which is called on every save when partial writes are enabled.
We can avoid generating the full changes hash by asking the mutation
tracker for just the names of the changed attributes. At minimum this
saves one array allocation per attribute, but will also avoid calling
`Attribute#original_value` which is expensive for serialized attributes.
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit a19e91f0fab13cca61acdb1f33e27be2323b9786.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#30985 caused `object.save` performance regression since calling
`changes` in `changes_applied` is very slow.
We don't need to call the expensive method in `changes_applied` as long
as `@attributes` is tracked by mutation tracker.
https://gist.github.com/kamipo/1a9f4f3891803b914fc72ede98268aa2
Before:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
create_string_columns
73.000 i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
create_string_columns
722.256 (± 5.8%) i/s - 3.650k in 5.073031s
```
After:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
create_string_columns
96.000 i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
create_string_columns
950.224 (± 7.7%) i/s - 4.800k in 5.084837s
```
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use these to back the attributes API. Stop automatically including
ActiveModel::Dirty in ActiveModel::Attributes, and make it optional.
|
|
|
|
| |
This basically reverts 9d4f79d3d394edb74fa2192e5d9ad7b09ce50c6d
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The extra mutation tracker was needed in Rails 5.1 to preserve the
old behaviour of `changes`, but now there is no difference
between `changes` and `changes_to_save`, so `@mutation_tracker`
can be removed.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`write_attribute_without_type_cast` is defined as a private method in
`AttributeMethods::Write`, but `AttributeMethods::Dirty` overrode it as
a public method. It should be kept the original visibility.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This module has behavior that is not present in `ActiveModel::Dirty`,
which is intended to be public API.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Improve the performance of writing attributes
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This name more accurately describes what the method does, and also
disambiguates it from `_write_attribute`, which ignores aliases.
We can also make the method private, since it's not public API and only
called from one place - `update_columns` - without an explicit receiver.
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Allow a default value to be declared for class_attribute
* Convert to using class_attribute default rather than explicit setter
* Removed instance_accessor option by mistake
* False is a valid default value
* Documentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We already have a _read_attribute method that can get the value we need
from the model. Lets define that method in AM::Dirty and use the
existing one from AR::Dirty rather than introducing a new method.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since using a `ActiveSupport::Deprecation::DeprecatedConstantProxy`
would prevent people from inheriting this class and extending it
from the `ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess` one would break
the ancestors chain, that's the best option we have here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pointed out by @matthewd that the HWIA subclass changes the
AS scoped class and top-level HWIA hierarchies out from under
existing classes.
This reverts commit 71da39097b67114329be6d8db7fe6911124531af, reversing
changes made to 41c33bd4b2ec3f4a482e6030b6fda15091d81e4a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This constant was kept for the sake of backward compatibility; it
is still available under `ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess`.
Furthermore, since Ruby 2.5 (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11547)
won't support top level constant lookup, people would have to update
their code anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was never really intended to work (at least not without calling
`define_attribute_methods`, which is less common with Active Record). As
we move forward the intention is to require the use of `attribute` over
`attr_accessor` for more complex model behavior both on Active Record
and Active Model, so this behavior is deprecated.
Fixes #27956.
Close #27963.
[Alex Serban & Sean Griffin]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I had pointed the messages at the new behavior, not the old.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
callbacks
We pretty frequently get bug reports that "dirty is broken inside of
after callbacks". Intuitively they are correct. You'd expect
`Model.after_save { puts changed? }; model.save` to do the same thing as
`model.save; puts model.changed?`, but it does not.
However, changing this goes much farther than just making the behavior
more intuitive. There are a _ton_ of places inside of AR that can be
drastically simplified with this change. Specifically, autosave
associations, timestamps, touch, counter cache, and just about anything
else in AR that works with callbacks have code to try to avoid "double
save" bugs which we will be able to flat out remove with this change.
We introduce two new sets of methods, both with names that are meant to
be more explicit than dirty. The first set maintains the old behavior,
and their names are meant to center that they are about changes that
occurred during the save that just happened. They are equivalent to
`previous_changes` when called outside of after callbacks, or once the
deprecation cycle moves.
The second set is the new behavior. Their names imply that they are
talking about changes from the database representation. The fact that
this is what we really care about became clear when looking at
`BelongsTo.touch_record` when tests were failing. I'm unsure that this
set of methods should be in the public API. Outside of after callbacks,
they are equivalent to the existing methods on dirty.
Dirty itself is not deprecated, nor are the methods inside of it. They
will only emit the warning when called inside of after callbacks. The
scope of this breakage is pretty large, but the migration path is
simple. Given how much this can improve our codebase, and considering
that it makes our API more intuitive, I think it's worth doing.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
|
|
|
| |
to reduce allocation of same object
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For reads, we never need to construct this object. The double `defined?`
check is to avoid errors in tests
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were a few places where I missed a `create` vs `new`
before_type_cast check, and the semantics of `reload` became wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can skip the allocation of a full `AttributeSet` by changing the
semantics of how we structure things. Instead of comparing two separate
`AttributeSet` objects, and `Attribute` is now a singly linked list of
every change that has happened to it. Since the attribute objects are
immutable, to apply the changes we simply need to copy the head of the
list.
It's worth noting that this causes one subtle change in the behavior of
AR. When a record is saved successfully, the `before_type_cast` version
of everything will be what was sent to the database. I honestly think
these semantics make more sense, as we could have just as easily had the
DB do `RETURNING *` and updated the record with those if we had things
like timestamps implemented at the DB layer.
This brings our performance closer to 4.2, but we're still not quite
there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm looking to move towards a tree-like structure for dirty checking
that involves an attribute holding onto the attribute that it was
created from. This means that `changed?` can be fully encapsulated on
that object. Since the objects are immutable, in `changes_applied`, we
can simply perform a shallow dup, instead of a deep one.
I'm not sure if that will actually end up in a performance boost, but
I'd like to semantically separate these concepts regardless
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When I removed the call to `super` to avoid the setting of
`@previous_changes`, I forgot to duplicate the other part of that
behavior, which led to failing tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The biggest source of the performance regression in these methods
occurred because dirty tracking required eagerly materializing and type
casting the assigned values. In the previous commits, I've changed dirty
tracking to perform the comparisons lazily. However, all of this is moot
when calling `save`, since `changes_applied` will be called, which just
ends up eagerly materializing everything, anyway. With the new mutation
tracker, it's easy to just compare the previous two hashes in the same
lazy fashion.
We will not have aliasing issues with this setup, which is proven by the
fact that we're able to detect nested mutation.
Before:
User.create! 2.007k (± 7.1%) i/s - 10.098k
After:
User.create! 2.557k (± 3.5%) i/s - 12.789k
Fixes #19859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to improve the performance of dirty checking, we're going to
need to duplicate all of the `previous_` methods in Active Model.
However, these methods are basically the same as their non-previous
counterparts, but comparing `@original_attributes` to
`@previous_original_attributes` instead of `@attributes` and
`@original_attributes`. This will help reduce that duplication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This moves a bit more of the logic required for dirty checking into the
attribute objects. I had hoped to remove the `with_value_from_database`
stuff, but unfortunately just calling `dup` on the attribute objects
isn't enough, since the values might contain deeply nested data
structures. I think this can be cleaned up further.
This makes most dirty checking become lazy, and reduces the number of
object allocations and amount of CPU time when assigning a value. This
opens the door (but doesn't quite finish) to improving the performance
of writes to a place comparable to 4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a getter has side effects on the DB, `changes_applied` will be called
twice. The second time will try and remove the changed attributes cache,
and will crash because it's already been unset. This also demonstrates
that we shouldn't assume that calling getters won't change the value of
`changed_attributes`, and we need to clear the cache if an attribute is
modified.
Fixes #20531.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's finally finished!!!!!!! The reason the Attributes API was kept
private in 4.2 was due to some publicly visible implementation details.
It was previously implemented by overloading `columns` and
`columns_hash`, to make them return column objects which were modified
with the attribute information.
This meant that those methods LIED! We didn't change the database
schema. We changed the attribute information on the class. That is
wrong! It should be the other way around, where schema loading just
calls the attributes API for you. And now it does!
Yes, this means that there is nothing that happens in automatic schema
loading that you couldn't manually do yourself. (There's still some
funky cases where we hit the connection adapter that I need to handle,
before we can turn off automatic schema detection entirely.)
There were a few weird test failures caused by this that had to be
fixed. The main source came from the fact that the attribute methods are
now defined in terms of `attribute_names`, which has a clause like
`return [] unless table_exists?`. I don't *think* this is an issue,
since the only place this caused failures were in a fake adapter which
didn't override `table_exists?`.
Additionally, there were a few cases where tests were failing because a
migration was run, but the model was not reloaded. I'm not sure why
these started failing from this change, I might need to clear an
additional cache in `reload_schema_from_cache`. Again, since this is not
normal usage, and it's expected that `reset_column_information` will be
called after the table is modified, I don't think it's a problem.
Still, test failures that were unrelated to the change are worrying, and
I need to dig into them further.
Finally, I spent a lot of time debugging issues with the mutex used in
`define_attribute_methods`. I think we can just remove that method
entirely, and define the attribute methods *manually* in the call to
`define_attribute`, which would simplify the code *tremendously*.
Ok. now to make this damn thing public, and work on moving it up to
Active Model.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #18580.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When an attribute is assigned, we determine if it was already marked as
changed so we can determine if we need to clear the changes, or mark it
as changed. Since this only affects the `attributes_changed_by_setter`
hash, in-place changes are irrelevant to this process. Since calculating
in-place changes can be expensive, we can just skip it here.
I also added a test for the only edge case I could think of that would
be affected by this change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This sets a precident for how we handle `attribute` calls, which aren't
backed by a database column. We should not take this as a conscious
decision on how to handle them, and this can change when we make
`attribute` public if we have better ideas in the future.
As the composed attributes API gets fleshed out, I expect the
`persistable_attributes` method to change to
`@attributes.select(&:persistable).keys`, or some more performant
variant there-of. This can probably go away completely once we fully
move dirty checking into the attribute objects once it gets moved up to
Active Model.
Fixes #18407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Calling `changed_attributes` will ultimately check if every mutable
attribute has changed in place. Since this gets called whenever an
attribute is assigned, it's extremely slow. Instead, we can avoid this
calculation until we actually need it.
Fixes #18029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The detection of in-place changes caused a weird unexpected issue with
numericality validations. That validator (out of necessity) works on the
`_before_type_cast` version of the attribute, since on an `:integer`
type column, a non-numeric string would type cast to 0.
However, strings are mutable, and we changed strings to ensure that the
post type cast version of the attribute was a different instance than
the before type cast version (so the mutation detection can work
properly).
Even though strings are the only mutable type for which a numericality
validation makes sense, special casing strings would feel like a strange
change to make here. Instead, we can make the assumption that for all
mutable types, we should work on the post-type-cast version of the
attribute, since all cases which would return 0 for non-numeric strings
are immutable.
Fixes #17852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We added a comparison to "id", and call to `self.class.primary_key` a
*lot*. We also have performance hits from `&block` all over the place.
We skip the check in a new method, in order to avoid breaking the
behavior of `read_attribute`
|