| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patches `CollectionAssociation#count` to return 0 without querying
if the parent record is new. Consider the following code:
class Account
has_many :dossiers
end
class Dossier
belongs_to :account
end
a = Account.new
a.dossiers.build
# before patch
a.dossiers.count
# SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "dossiers" WHERE "dossiers"."account_id" IS NULL
# => 0
# after
a.dosiers.count # fires without sql query
# => 0
Fixes #1856.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/asset_tag_helper.rb
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
| |
65843e1acc0c8d285ff79f8c9c49d4d1215440be
|
|\
| |
| | |
Integrate strong_parameters in Rails 4
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
Fix collection= on hm:t join models when unsaved
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If assigning to a has_many :through collection against an unsaved
object using the collection=[<array_of_items>] syntax, the join models
were not properly created, previously.
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The COUNT clause of a finder_sql relationship is being rewritten from
COUNT(*) to COUNT(table_name.*). This does not appear to be valid syntax
in MySQL:
```
mysql> SELECT COUNT( table_name.* ) FROM `table_name`;
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the
manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right
syntax to use near '* ) FROM `table_name`' at line 1
```
This fixes the bug, as well as adding tests so we don't re-introduce
it in the future.
Fixes #3956.
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Fix eagerly loading associations without primary keys
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Method compilation provides better performance and I think the code
comes out cleaner as well.
A knock on effect is that methods that get redefined produce warnings. I
think this is a good thing. I had to deal with a bunch of warnings
coming from our tests, though.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Well, not all of them, but some of them.
I don't think there's much reason for these methods to be private.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We don't need the complexity of to_sentence, and it shouldn't be a bang
method.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It's not really a good idea to have this as a global config option. We
should allow people to specify the behaviour per association.
There will now be two new values:
* :dependent => :restrict_with_exception implements the current
behaviour of :restrict. :restrict itself is deprecated in favour of
:restrict_with_exception.
* :dependent => :restrict_with_error implements the new behaviour - it
adds an error to the owner if there are dependent records present
See #4727 for the original discussion of this.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
by Active Support)
Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails
made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base.
After some discussion in
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d
we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough
for this particular idiom.
In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes
include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the
way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case
statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked
the most in each case.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
COUNT(*) queries can be slow in PostgreSQL, #exists? avoids this by
selecting a single record.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This can be used to get a Relation from an association.
Previously we had a #scoped method, but we're deprecating that for
AR::Base, so it doesn't make sense to have it here.
This was requested by DHH, to facilitate code like this:
Project.scope.order('created_at DESC').page(current_page).tagged_with(@tag).limit(5).scoping do
@topics = @project.topics.scope
@todolists = @project.todolists.scope
@attachments = @project.attachments.scope
@documents = @project.documents.scope
end
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This makes it easier to see what the documentation refers to.
It also means that we are not doing unnecessary work for delegations
that have no args / splats / block / etc.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 3803fcce26b837c0117f7d278b83c366dc4ed370.
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
It will be deprecated only in 4.0, and removed properly in 4.1.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Move the logic for validation check to the same method, and cache
dependent option in a variable to reuse inside the dependency
configuration methods instead of relying on the options hash.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It has been moved to active_record_deprecated_finders.
Use #to_a instead.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It doesn't serve much purpose now that ActiveRecord::Base.all returns a
Relation.
The code is moved to active_record_deprecated_finders.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes #1190
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This code is broken (it should say association_scope.uniq_value rather
than options[:uniq]) but the tests still pass.
I think it is designed to uniq-ify associations using finder_sql.
However, I am about to remove that anyway.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This fixes active_record_deprecated_finders.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|