| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Improve the derivation of HABTM join table name to take account of nesting.
It now takes the table names of the two models, sorts them lexically and
then joins them, stripping any common prefix from the second table name.
Some examples:
Top level models
(Category <=> Product)
Old: categories_products
New: categories_products
Top level models with a global table_name_prefix
(Category <=> Product)
Old: site_categories_products
New: site_categories_products
Nested models in a module without a table_name_prefix method
(Admin::Category <=> Admin::Product)
Old: categories_products
New: categories_products
Nested models in a module with a table_name_prefix method
(Admin::Category <=> Admin::Product)
Old: categories_products
New: admin_categories_products
Nested models in a parent model
(Catalog::Category <=> Catalog::Product)
Old: categories_products
New: catalog_categories_products
Nested models in different parent models
(Catalog::Category <=> Content::Page)
Old: categories_pages
New: catalog_categories_content_pages
Also as part of this commit the validity checks for HABTM assocations have
been moved to ActiveRecord::Reflection One side effect of this is to move when
the exceptions are raised from the point of declaration to when the association
is built. This is consistant with other association validity checks.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
pacoguzman/refactor_define_restrict_dependency_method
Refactor define_restrict_dependency_method using reflection
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
warning removed: mismatched indentations
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See the CHANGELOG for details.
Fixes #950.
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit c99d507fccca2e9e4d12e49b4387e007c5481ae9.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change uses Module.redefine_method as defined in ActiveSupport.
Making Module.define_method public would be as clean in the code, and
would also emit warnings when redefining an association. That is pretty
messy given current tests, so I'm leaving it for someone else to decide
what approach is better.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of generating association methods directly in the model
class, they are generated in an anonymous module which
is then included in the model class. There is one such module
for each association. The only subtlety is that the
generated_attributes_methods module (from ActiveModel) must
be forced to be included before association methods are created
so that attribute methods will not shadow association methods.
|
|
|
|
| |
issue #402.
|
|
|
|
| |
it was properly removed
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After a long list of discussion about the performance problem from using varargs and the reason that we can't find a great pair for it, it would be best to remove support for it for now.
It will come back if we can find a good pair for it. For now, Bon Voyage, `#among?`.
|
|
|
|
| |
suggestion!
|
|
|
|
| |
There're a lot of places in Rails source code which make a lot of sense to switching to Object#in? or Object#either? instead of using [].include?.
|
|
|
|
| |
The old method of redefining destroy meant that clearing the HABTM join table would happen as long as the call to destroy succeeded. Which meant if there was a before_destroy that stopped the instance being destroyed using normal means (returning false, raising ActiveRecord::Rollback) rather than exceptional means the join table would be cleared even though the instance wasn't destroyed. Doing it in an after_destroy hook avoids this and has the advantage of happening inside the DB transaction too.
|
|
callbacks etc) rather than calling a whole bunch of methods with rather long names.
|