| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #23645
When you're using an `attr_accessor` for a record instead of an
attribute in the database there's no way for the record to know if it
has `changed?` unless you tell it `attribute_will_change!("attribute")`.
The change made in 27aa4dd updated validations to check if a record was
`changed?` or `marked_for_destruction?` or not `persisted?`. It did not
take into account virtual attributes that do not affect the model's
dirty status.
The only way to fix this is to always validate the record if the
attribute does not belong to the set of attributes the record expects
(in `record.attributes`) because virtual attributes will not be in that
hash.
I think we should consider deprecating this particular behavior in the
future and requiring that the user mark the record dirty by noting that
the virtual attribute will change. Unfortunately this isn't easy because
we have no way of knowing that you did the "right thing" in your
application by marking it dirty and will get the deprecation warning
even if you are doing the correct thing.
For now this restores expected behavior when using a virtual attribute
by always validating the record, as well as adds tests for this case.
I was going to add the `!record.attributes.include?(attribute)` to the
`should_validate?` method but `uniqueness` cannot validate a virtual
attribute with nothing to hold on to the attribute. Because of this
`should_validate?` was about to become a very messy method so I decided
to split them up so we can handle it specifically for each case.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* 5-0-beta-sec:
bumping version
fix version update task to deal with .beta1.1
Eliminate instance level writers for class accessors
allow :file to be outside rails root, but anything else must be inside the rails view directory
Don't short-circuit reject_if proc
stop caching mime types globally
use secure string comparisons for basic auth username / password
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Instance level writers can have an impact on how the Active Model /
Record objects are saved. Specifically, they can be used to bypass
validations. This is a problem if mass assignment protection is
disabled and specific attributes are passed to the constructor.
CVE-2016-0753
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is an alternate implementation to #22875, that generalizes a lot of
the logic that type decorators are going to need, in order to have them
work with arrays, ranges, etc. The types have the ability to map over a
value, with the default implementation being to just yield that given
value. Array and Range give more appropriate definitions.
This does not automatically make ranges time zone aware, as they need to
be added to the `time_zone_aware` types config, but we could certainly
make that change if we feel it is appropriate. I do think this would be
a breaking change however, and should at least have a deprecation cycle.
Closes #22875.
/cc @matthewd
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
While the type definition is in Active Model the change of behavior will
be only user facing in Active Record so better to put the entry in its
changelog.
[ci skip]
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
A regression (#22744) introduced in 7500dae caused certain numericality
validations to raise an error when run against an attribute with a
string value. Previously, these validations would successfully run
against string values because the value was cast to a numeric class.
This commit resolves the regression by converting string values to
floats before performing numericality comparison validations.
[fixes #22744]
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Covers Regressions:
* <=
* <
* ==
* >
* >=
* other than
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
During the `5.0.0.beta1` release, the CHANGELOGs got an entry like the
following:
```
* No changes.
```
It is kinda confusing as there are indeed changes after it. Not a
biggie, just a small pass over the CHANGELOGs.
[ci skip]
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
:tada: :beers:
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Deprecate passing string to define callback.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently generate an unbounded number of prepared statements when
`limit` or `offset` are called with a dynamic argument. This changes
`LIMIT` and `OFFSET` to use bind params, eliminating the problem.
`Type::Value#hash` needed to be implemented, as it turns out we busted
the query cache if the type object used wasn't exactly the same object.
This drops support for passing an `Arel::Nodes::SqlLiteral` to `limit`.
Doing this relied on AR internals, and was never officially supported
usage.
Fixes #22250.
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Use adapter supports_datetime_with_precision
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
[ci skip] Add a dollar sign to each command in the READMEs
|
| | |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
According to pr #22443 in the guides there's always a dollar sign before every command, so why is in the main README a `$` and in every submodule a `%`?
Just eye candy..
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Update and fix forbidden attributes test issues caused by AC::Parameters change
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Add AC::Parameters tests for WhereChain#not
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | | |
[ci skip] Update dirty.rb: documentation fix.
|
| |/ /
| |
| | |
ActiveModel::Dirty module documentation fix.
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ok, this explains why the branch showed as green. We don't run files in
isolation for PRs, only for master. Active Support monkeypatches
`BigDecimal#to_s`, so the generated error message was different
depending on if the file was run in isolation
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The error message when asserting `greater_than: BigDecimal.new` will
give an error message based on how BigDecimal displays itself. Big
decimal appears to always use scientific notation. This might not be the
best error message for the general case, but the general case wouldn't
use big decimal for the validation. And if they do, they likely need
this level of precision.
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Use the post-type-cast version of the attribute to validate numericality
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This fixes the issue where you may be comparing (using a numeric
validator such as `greater_than`) numbers of a specific Numeric type
such as `BigDecimal`.
Previous behavior took the numeric value to be validated and
unconditionally converted to Float. For example, due to floating point
precision, this can cause issues when comparing a Float to a BigDecimal.
Consider the following:
```
validates :sub_total, numericality: {
greater_than: BigDecimal('97.18')
}
```
If the `:sub_total` value BigDecimal.new('97.18') was validated against
the above, the following would be valid since `:sub_total` is converted
to a Float regardless of its original type. The result therefore becomes
Kernel.Float(97.18) > BigDecimal.new('97.18')
The above illustrated behavior is corrected with this patch by
conditionally converting the value to validate to float.
Use the post-type-cast version of the attribute to validate numericality
[Roque Pinel & Trevor Wistaff]
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I seriously don't even know why we handle booleans, but those strings
should technically be frozen. Additionally, we don't need to actually
check the class in the mutable string type, since the `cast_value`
function will always return a string.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This type adds an escape hatch to apps for which string duping causes
unacceptable memory growth. The reason we are duping them is in order to
detect mutation, which was a feature added to 4.2 in #15674. The string
type was modified to support this behavior in #15788.
Memory growth is really only a concern for string types, as it's the
only mutable type where the act of coersion does not create a new object
regardless (as we're usually returning an object of a different class).
I do feel strongly that if we are going to support detecting mutation,
we should do it universally for any type which is mutable. While it is
less common and ideomatic to mutate strings than arrays or hashes, there
shouldn't be rules or gotchas to understanding our behavior.
However, I also appreciate that for apps which are using a lot of string
columns, this would increase the number of allocations by a large
factor. To ensure that we keep our contract, if you'd like to opt out of
mutation detection on strings, you'll also be option out of mutation of
those strings.
I'm not completely married to the thought that strings coming out of
this actually need to be frozen -- and I think the name is correct
either way, as the purpose of this is to provide a string type which
does not detect mutation.
In the new implementation, I'm only overriding `cast_value`. I did not
port over the duping in `serialize`. I cannot think of a reason we'd
need to dup the string there, and the tests pass without it.
Unfortunately that line was introduced at a time where I was not nearly
as good about writing my commit messages, so I have no context as to
why I added it. Thanks past Sean. You are a jerk.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Use the documented module instead of ActiveModel::Model.
This makes the example more focused.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
[ci skip] Fix explanation of `ActiveModel::Serialization`
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This explanation was change by https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/7a27de2b.
This change reversed the including module (`ActiveModel::Serializers::JSON`)
and the included module (`ActiveModel::Serialization`) by mistake.
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Move from `AS::Callbacks::CallbackChain.halt_and_display_warning_on_return_false`
to `AS::Callbacks.halt_and_display_warning_on_return_false` base on
[this
discussion](https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/21218#discussion_r39354580)
Fix the documentation broken by 0a120a818d413c64ff9867125f0b03788fc306f8
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The implementation of `attribute_method?` on Active Record requires
establishing a database connection and querying the schema. As a general
rule, we don't want to require database connections for any class macro,
as the class should be able to be loaded without a database (e.g. for
things like compiling assets).
Instead of eagerly defining these methods, we do it lazily the first
time they are accessed via `method_missing`. This should not cause any
performance hits, as it will only hit `method_missing` once for the
entire class.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The biggest source of the performance regression in these methods
occurred because dirty tracking required eagerly materializing and type
casting the assigned values. In the previous commits, I've changed dirty
tracking to perform the comparisons lazily. However, all of this is moot
when calling `save`, since `changes_applied` will be called, which just
ends up eagerly materializing everything, anyway. With the new mutation
tracker, it's easy to just compare the previous two hashes in the same
lazy fashion.
We will not have aliasing issues with this setup, which is proven by the
fact that we're able to detect nested mutation.
Before:
User.create! 2.007k (± 7.1%) i/s - 10.098k
After:
User.create! 2.557k (± 3.5%) i/s - 12.789k
Fixes #19859
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This moves a bit more of the logic required for dirty checking into the
attribute objects. I had hoped to remove the `with_value_from_database`
stuff, but unfortunately just calling `dup` on the attribute objects
isn't enough, since the values might contain deeply nested data
structures. I think this can be cleaned up further.
This makes most dirty checking become lazy, and reduces the number of
object allocations and amount of CPU time when assigning a value. This
opens the door (but doesn't quite finish) to improving the performance
of writes to a place comparable to 4.1
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
WIP: Fix the AS::Callbacks terminator regression from 4.2.3
|
