| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently we sometimes find a redundant begin block in code review
(e.g. https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/33604#discussion_r209784205).
I'd like to enable `Style/RedundantBegin` cop to avoid that, since
rescue/else/ensure are allowed inside do/end blocks in Ruby 2.5
(https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12906), so we'd probably meets with
that situation than before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
since Ruby 2.5
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14133
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Larochelle/i18n_full_message_with_nested_attributes
`ActiveModel.full_message` interaction with `index_errors`
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Record
The purpose of fe9547b is to work type casting to value from database.
But that was caused not to use the value before type cast even except
Active Record.
There we never guarantees that the value before type cast was going to
the used in this validation, but we should not change the behavior
unless there is some particular reason.
To restore original behavior, still use the value before type cast if
`came_from_user?` is undefined (i.e. except Active Record).
Fixes #33651.
Fixes #33686.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Allow to override the full_message error format
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
| |
Follow up of #32605.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I believe that this was caused by a copy/paste mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I found a bug that validation callbacks don't fire on multiple context.
So I've fixed it.
Example:
```ruby
class Dog
include ActiveModel::Validations
include ActiveModel::Validations::Callbacks
attr_accessor :history
def initialize
@history = []
end
before_validation :set_before_validation_on_a, on: :a
before_validation :set_before_validation_on_b, on: :b
after_validation :set_after_validation_on_a, on: :a
after_validation :set_after_validation_on_b, on: :b
def set_before_validation_on_a; history << "before_validation on a"; end
def set_before_validation_on_b; history << "before_validation on b"; end
def set_after_validation_on_a; history << "after_validation on a" ; end
def set_after_validation_on_b; history << "after_validation on b" ; end
end
```
Before:
```
d = Dog.new
d.valid?([:a, :b])
d.history # []
```
After:
```
d = Dog.new
d.valid?([:a, :b])
d.history # ["before_validation on a", "before_validation on b", "after_validation on a", "after_validation on b"]
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`BigDecimal.new` has been deprecated in BigDecimal 1.3.3
which will be a default for Ruby 2.5.
Refer ruby/bigdecimal@5337373
* This commit has been made as follows:
```ruby
$ cd activemodel/
$ git grep -l BigDecimal.new | grep \.rb | xargs sed -i -e "s/BigDecimal.new/BigDecimal/g"
```
* This commit has been tested with these Ruby versions:
```
ruby 2.5.0dev (2017-12-15 trunk 61262) [x86_64-linux]
ruby 2.4.2p198 (2017-09-14 revision 59899) [x86_64-linux]
ruby 2.3.5p376 (2017-09-14 revision 59905) [x86_64-linux]
ruby 2.2.8p477 (2017-09-14 revision 59906) [x86_64-linux]
```
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
bogdanvlviv/test-if-unless-options-for-validations
Add cases to test combining validation conditions
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
- Test condition that is defined by array of conditions
- Test condition that is defined by combining :if and :unless
- Test local condition that is defined by :if
- Test local condition that is defined by :unless
See http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_validations.html#combining-validation-conditions
|
|/
|
|
| |
`false`
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This brings the Length validator in line with the Numericality
validator, which currently supports Proc & Symbol arguments
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 3420a14590c0e6915d8b6c242887f74adb4120f9, reversing
changes made to afb66a5a598ce4ac74ad84b125a5abf046dcf5aa.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
\Z was a mistake of \z. Replace \Z to \z to prevent newly \Z added.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
`set_callback` and `skip_callback`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now a few tests in ActiveModel rely on Ruby implementation and the fact
that in MRI `97.18` as a float is greater than `97.18` as a BigDecimal.
This is only relevant for MRI. On JRuby, comparing float to BigDecimal
would be conversion of them to the same type and they will be equal.
I'd like the ActiveModel test suite to be Ruby implementation-agnostic.
Here we test ActiveModel, not the Ruby internals.
This PR fixes a couple more JRuby tests.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
assert [1, 3].includes?(2) fails with unhelpful "Asserting failed" message
assert_includes [1, 3], 2 fails with "Expected [1, 3] to include 2" which makes it easier to debug and more obvious what went wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All indentation was normalized by rubocop auto-correct at 80e66cc4d90bf8c15d1a5f6e3152e90147f00772.
But comments was still kept absolute position. This commit aligns
comments with method definitions for consistency.
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Guillermo Iguaran <guilleiguaran@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Style/SpaceBeforeBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideHashLiteralBraces
Fix all violations in the repository.
|
|
|
|
| |
Hash syntax auto-correcting breaks alignments. 411ccbdab2608c62aabdb320d52cb02d446bb39c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A few have been left for aesthetic reasons, but have made a pass
and removed most of them.
Note that if the method `foo` returns an array, `foo << 1`
is a regular push, nothing to do with assignments, so
no self required.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ruby 2.4 unifies Fixnum and Bignum into Integer: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12005
* Forward compat with new unified Integer class in Ruby 2.4+.
* Backward compat with separate Fixnum/Bignum in Ruby 2.2 & 2.3.
* Drops needless Fixnum distinction in docs, preferring Integer.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Covers Regressions:
* <=
* <
* ==
* >
* >=
* other than
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ok, this explains why the branch showed as green. We don't run files in
isolation for PRs, only for master. Active Support monkeypatches
`BigDecimal#to_s`, so the generated error message was different
depending on if the file was run in isolation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The error message when asserting `greater_than: BigDecimal.new` will
give an error message based on how BigDecimal displays itself. Big
decimal appears to always use scientific notation. This might not be the
best error message for the general case, but the general case wouldn't
use big decimal for the validation. And if they do, they likely need
this level of precision.
|