rails.git - Mirror of official rails repo with custom fixes.

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Use the new clear_validators! api to reset validators in tests	Carlos Antonio da Silva	2014-01-27	1	-3/+3
\|
*	Let validates_inclusion_of accept Time and DateTime ranges	Akira Matsuda	2013-10-23	1	-0/+22
\| \| \| \|	fixes 4.0.0 regression introduced in 0317b93c17a46d7663a8c36edc26ad0ba3d75f85
*	Use Range#cover? for Numeric ranges (tests via endpoints) and use ↵	Charles Bergeron	2013-05-27	1	-0/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Range#include? for non-numeric ranges added changelog message
*	Convert ActiveModel to 1.9 hash syntax.	Patrick Robertson	2013-05-01	1	-13/+13
\| \| \| \| \|	I also attempted to fix other styleguide violations such as { a: :b } over {a: :b} and foo(b: 'bar') over foo( b: 'bar' ).
*	Fix method redefined warnings.	kennyj	2012-08-29	1	-0/+3
\|
*	Accept a symbol for `:in` option on inclusion and exclusion validators	Gabriel Sobrinho	2012-08-24	1	-0/+22
\|
*	`validates_inclusion_of` and `validates_exclusion_of` now accept	Rafael Mendonça França	2012-07-20	1	-0/+10
\| \| \| \| \| \|	`:within` option as alias of `:in` as documented. Fix #7118
*	Update variable's name in the test case to reflect the class we're testing	Prem Sichanugrist	2011-11-18	1	-6/+6
\|
*	Follow code conventions on some tests	Sebastian Martinez	2011-05-10	1	-1/+1
\|
*	No need to rescue here. Invoking the wrong method in an object can happen ↵	José Valim	2011-04-11	1	-9/+0
\| \| \| \|	anywhere if you are not careful. In other words, test your shit.
*	Revert "Add :use_include option to allow user to explicitly use ↵	José Valim	2011-04-11	1	-9/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	`Range#include?` method in Ruby 1.9" Use :with => range.to_a instead. This reverts commit f6540211b5b9133c9f93c11655a04d613c237e67.
*	Add :use_include option to allow user to explicitly use `Range#include?` ↵	Prem Sichanugrist	2011-04-10	1	-0/+9
\| \| \| \| \| \|	method in Ruby 1.9 In Ruby 1.9 we're currently use `Range#cover?` to fix the performance problem. However, there might be the case that you want to use `Range#include?` instead. This patch will give you that option.
*	Add support for proc or lambda as an option for InclusionValidator, ↵	Prem Sichanugrist	2011-04-10	1	-0/+21
\| \| \| \| \| \|	ExclusionValidator, and FormatValidator You can now use a proc or lambda in :in option for InclusionValidator and ExclusionValidator, and :with, :without option for FormatValidator
*	Change validates inclusion to use cover? for Ranges in ruby 1.9 [#6453 ↵	Frederick Cheung	2011-02-18	1	-0/+9
\| \| \| \| \| \|	state:committed] Signed-off-by: Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com>
*	removed AR from all AMo tests, including any unneeded files (schema, ↵	Josh Kalderimis	2010-05-09	1	-2/+0
\| \| \| \|	fixtures and test helper)
*	removed an old unused model in the AMo tests which also removes another AR ↵	Josh Kalderimis	2010-05-09	1	-1/+0
\| \| \| \|	dependency
*	removed use of AR in AMo tests and removed testing of scopes (:on) in ↵	Josh Kalderimis	2010-05-08	1	-11/+11
\| \| \| \|	individual validation tests and moved them to their own test file
*	Favor %{} in all code instead of (deprecated) {{}} as interpolation syntax ↵	Lawrence Pit	2010-05-03	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	for I18n Signed-off-by: José Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
*	No need to use ValidationsRepairHelper hack on ActiveModel anymore, ↵	José Valim	2009-12-23	1	-21/+12
\| \| \| \|	Model.reset_callbacks(:validate) is enough. However, tests in ActiveRecord are still coupled, so moved ValidationsRepairHelper back there.
*	Add ActiveModel::Validations tests for regular ruby classes	Pratik Naik	2009-03-20	1	-0/+17
\|
*	Deprecate Error#on(attribute) in favour of Errors#[attribute]	Pratik Naik	2009-03-20	1	-4/+4
\|
*	TestDatabase -> TestsDatabase	Pratik Naik	2009-03-20	1	-2/+2
\|
*	Move relevant validation tests from Active Record to Active Model	Pratik Naik	2009-03-20	1	-0/+63