aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/activemodel/lib/active_model/type/string.rb
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Add `Style/RedundantFreeze` to remove redudant `.freeze`Yasuo Honda2018-09-291-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since Rails 6.0 will support Ruby 2.4.1 or higher `# frozen_string_literal: true` magic comment is enough to make string object frozen. This magic comment is enabled by `Style/FrozenStringLiteralComment` cop. * Exclude these files not to auto correct false positive `Regexp#freeze` - 'actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/journey/router/utils.rb' - 'activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/sqlite3_adapter.rb' It has been fixed by https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/pull/6333 Once the newer version of RuboCop released and available at Code Climate these exclude entries should be removed. * Replace `String#freeze` with `String#-@` manually if explicit frozen string objects are required - 'actionpack/test/controller/test_case_test.rb' - 'activemodel/test/cases/type/string_test.rb' - 'activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/string/strip.rb' - 'activesupport/test/core_ext/string_ext_test.rb' - 'railties/test/generators/actions_test.rb'
* [Active Model] require => require_relativeAkira Matsuda2017-10-211-1/+1
| | | | This basically reverts ee5cfc01a5797f854c8441539b0cae326a81b963
* Use frozen string literal in activemodel/Kir Shatrov2017-07-161-0/+2
|
* [Active Model] require => require_relativeAkira Matsuda2017-07-011-1/+1
|
* Don't freeze input stringsMatthew Draper2017-04-121-1/+6
| | | | | | | | | See 34321e4a433bb7eef48fd743286601403f8f7d82 for background on ImmutableString vs String. Our String type cannot delegate typecasting to ImmutableString, because the latter freezes its input: duplicating the value after that gives us an unfrozen result, but still mutates the originally passed object.
* normalizes indentation and whitespace across the projectXavier Noria2016-08-061-3/+3
|
* All strings returned by `ImmutableString` should be frozenSean Griffin2015-10-151-6/+1
| | | | | | | I seriously don't even know why we handle booleans, but those strings should technically be frozen. Additionally, we don't need to actually check the class in the mutable string type, since the `cast_value` function will always return a string.
* Add an immutable string type to opt out of string dupingSean Griffin2015-10-151-20/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This type adds an escape hatch to apps for which string duping causes unacceptable memory growth. The reason we are duping them is in order to detect mutation, which was a feature added to 4.2 in #15674. The string type was modified to support this behavior in #15788. Memory growth is really only a concern for string types, as it's the only mutable type where the act of coersion does not create a new object regardless (as we're usually returning an object of a different class). I do feel strongly that if we are going to support detecting mutation, we should do it universally for any type which is mutable. While it is less common and ideomatic to mutate strings than arrays or hashes, there shouldn't be rules or gotchas to understanding our behavior. However, I also appreciate that for apps which are using a lot of string columns, this would increase the number of allocations by a large factor. To ensure that we keep our contract, if you'd like to opt out of mutation detection on strings, you'll also be option out of mutation of those strings. I'm not completely married to the thought that strings coming out of this actually need to be frozen -- and I think the name is correct either way, as the purpose of this is to provide a string type which does not detect mutation. In the new implementation, I'm only overriding `cast_value`. I did not port over the duping in `serialize`. I cannot think of a reason we'd need to dup the string there, and the tests pass without it. Unfortunately that line was introduced at a time where I was not nearly as good about writing my commit messages, so I have no context as to why I added it. Thanks past Sean. You are a jerk.
* Move ActiveRecord::Type to ActiveModelKir Shatrov2015-09-211-0/+36
The first step of bringing typecasting to ActiveModel