| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Recently, the Rails team made an effort to keep the source code consistent, using Ruboco
(bb1ecdcc677bf6e68e0252505509c089619b5b90 and below). Some of the case
statements were missed.
This changes the case statements' formatting and is consistent with changes
in 810dff7c9fa9b2a38eb1560ce0378d760529ee6b and db63406cb007ab3756d2a96d2e0b5d4e777f8231.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since precision is always larger than scale, it can actually change
rounding behavior. Given a precision of 5 and a scale of 3, when you
apply the precision of 5 to `1.25047`, the result is `1.2505`, which
when the scale is applied would be `1.251` instead of the expected
`1.250`.
This issue appears to only occur with floats, as scale doesn't apply to
other numeric types, and the bigdecimal constructor actually ignores
precision entirely when working with strings. There's no way we could
handle this for the "unknown object which responds to `to_d`" case, as
we can't assume an interface for applying the scale.
Fixes #24235
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In Active Record, it appears these were either autoloaded, which
actually was likely due to test ordering since the method `Float#to_d`
wouldn't trigger it. This makes it explicit, and unlikely to fail in the
future.
|
|
|
The first step of bringing typecasting to ActiveModel
|
