| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since there are disparities between the raised error messages on the
different implementations, let's avoid being too accurate.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
ref: https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/18763#issuecomment-72349769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, if you tried to use form_for with a presenter object
that implements to_model, it would crash in
action_dispatch/routing/polymorphic_routes.rb when asking the presenter
whether it is .persisted?
Now, we always ask .persisted? of the to_model object instead.
This seems to been an issue since 1606fc9d840da869a60213bc889da6fcf1fdc431
Signed-off-by: Eugenia Dellapenna <eugenia.dellapenna@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit moves a test from `test/template` to `test/activerecord` since the
test depends on ActiveRecord.
This matches the documentation from [RUNNING_UNIT_TESTS](https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/f28d1ddd507174ac233b773cc4f35c3c05ad32e7/actionview/RUNNING_UNIT_TESTS.rdoc):
> Test cases in the test/activerecord/ directory depend on having activerecord and sqlite3 installed.
> If Active Record is not in actionview/../activerecord directory, or the sqlite3 rubygem is not installed, these tests are skipped.
> Other tests are runnable from a fresh copy of actionview without any configuration.
---
More details about this commit.
All the tests starting with `require 'active_record_unit'` are already
inside `test/activerecord`, except for the one test this commit moves.
If you don't have `active_record` on your machine, the following command
currently fails on master:
```bash
```
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #17057
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Suppose you have two resources routed in the following manner:
```ruby
resources :blogs do
resources :posts
end
resources :posts
```
When using polymorphic resource routing like `url_for([@blog, @post])`, and `@blog` is `nil` Rails should still try to match the route to the top-level posts resource.
Fixes #16754
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Use #model_name on instances instead of classes
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This allows rails code to be more confdent when asking for a model name, instead of having to ask for the class.
Rails core discussion here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-core/ThSaXw9y1F8
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
| |
The message passed to Minitest's assert_raise is used as output in case
the assertion fails, but we can test against the exact message by using
the actual exception object that is returned from the assert_raise call.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
o_O
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
you call the method
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We are dropping HTML 4.01 and XHTML strict compliance since input
tags directly inside a form are valid HTML5, and the absense of
inline styles help in validating for Content Security Policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The use of `display:inline` with the content_tag call in the
extra_tags_for_form method potentially causes display issues with some
browsers, namely Internet Explorer. IE's behaviour of not collapsing
the line height on divs with ostensibly no content means that the
automatically added div containing the hidden authenticity_token, utf8
and _method form input tags may interfere with other visible form
elements in certain circumstances. The use of `display:none` rather
than `display:inline` fixes this problem.
Fixes #6403
|
|
|