| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
add `# Let's say that @user.receive_newsletter returns "no":` for `def radio_button(object_name, method, tag_value, options = {})`.
fix `# Let's say that @user.category returns "no":` to `# Let's say that @user.receive_newsletter returns "no":`
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A change was made in the helper that renders the `datetime`,
being now by default `datetime-local` and creating
an alias of `datetime-local` for `datetime`, `datetime` tag and
it passes to be an abstract class for all other tags that inherit from him.
As a new specification of the HTML 5 the text field type `datetime`
will no longer exist and will pass a `datetime-local`.
Ref: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/forms.html#local-date-and-time-state-(type=datetime-local)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The reason we are reverting this commit is because it created breaking
changes for file upload gems. For more information see discussion here:
https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/17947#issuecomment-225154294
This reverts commit c455817804e4df64c46c17a0cdec0e5a1ca5ba2e, reversing
changes made to 8b3cd74b8a09ef85a43d7631bb062a9ec7f57227.
Conflicts:
actionview/CHANGELOG.md
actionview/lib/action_view/helpers/form_helper.rb
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Datetime input type was removed from HTML specification.
One can use `datetime_local_field` and `datetime_local_field_tag` instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
stevenspiel/titleize_model_name_for_default_submit_button_value"
This reverts commit 4158974c60d817c9bc1e2aecb342161295f2ac0d, reversing
changes made to 3d590add45b7ff1de972d99b076cb504d5208935.
Reason: This break i18n in some languages. See
https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/791#issuecomment-192724640
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of html_safe in favour of raw() in AV helpers.
Also changed usage of html_safe to make use of raw() instead so that the intended behaviour is verified with raw()
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When this method was implemented
(https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/5016/files), `to_date` is called.
But this behavior was chagned refactoring
(https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/6452/files).
In the first commit, there were not test which asserts `to_date` is called.
I think trying `to_date` is more useful than trying `strftime`, because
we can write `"2015-01-01".to_date`. But first fix comments to match
actual behavior.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Handle nested fields_for by adding indexes to record_name
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In case of the form with nested fields_for, i. e.
<%= form_for :foos, url: root_path do |f| %>
<% @foos.each do |foo| %>
<%= f.fields_for 'foo[]', foo do |f2| %>
<%= f2.text_field :id %>
<% foo.bars.each do |bar| %>
<%= f2.fields_for 'bar[]', bar do |b| %>
<%= b.text_field :id %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
<%= f.submit %>
<% end %>
rails doesn't add index for 'foo' in the inner fields_for block, so field names
in the outer fields_for looks like "foos[foo][#{foo_index}][id]" and in the
inner "foos[foo[]][bar][#{bar_index}][id]". Submitting of such form leads to an
error like:
>ActionController::BadRequest (Invalid request parameters: expected Array
>(got Rack::QueryParser::Params) for param `foo'):
This commit adds indexes for the foos in the inner blocks, so field names
become "foos[foo][#{foo_index}][bar][#{bar_index}][id]" and submitting of such
form works fine as expected.
Fixes #15332
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
guides/source/4_0_release_notes.md
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The previous change 92a3c8dcdf174dab5e8759031b6bbe6cd891fe3c improved
this example, but calling .create + #valid? ends up running validations
twice, and we don't want to showcase that.
Lets use the normal use case of building a new object and calling #save
on it, which is what a basic scaffold with Active Record does.
[ci skip]
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Rename default_form_builder to avoid collision
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Per DHH in #18337, ActionView::Helpers::RecordTagHelper has been
extracted to an external gem (source currently lives at
todd/record_tag_helper). Removal notices have also been added for anyone
upgrading that use the extracted methods.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This will avoid a error be raised when the only input on the form is the
`file_field`.
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Document *all* the options accepted by form_for
Conflicts:
actionview/lib/action_view/helpers/form_helper.rb
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The [current documentation of form_for](http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/FormHelper.html#method-i-form_for) is incomplete:
> The rightmost argument to form_for is an optional hash of options -
> :url - The URL the form is to be submitted to. This may be represented in the same way as values passed to url_for or link_to. So for example you may use a named route directly. When the model is represented by a string or symbol, as in the example above, if the :url option is not specified, by default the form will be sent back to the current url (We will describe below an alternative resource-oriented usage of form_for in which the URL does not need to be specified explicitly).
> :namespace - A namespace for your form to ensure uniqueness of id attributes on form elements. The namespace attribute will be prefixed with underscore on the generated HTML id.
> :html - Optional HTML attributes for the form tag.
This commit completes the documentation by specifying that:
* `:authenticity_token` is also a valid option (as [documented here](https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/b0f44c9ff0be84ebc42760029adeeb9dd954655f/actionview/lib/action_view/helpers/form_helper.rb#L396))
* `:method` is also a valid option (as [tested here](https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/b0f44c9ff0be84ebc42760029adeeb9dd954655f/actionview/test/template/form_helper_test.rb#L1819))
* `:remote` is also a valid option (as [tested here](https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/b0f44c9ff0be84ebc42760029adeeb9dd954655f/actionview/test/template/form_helper_test.rb#L1850))
[ci skip]
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since 06388b0 `form_tag` accepts the option `enforce_utf8` which, when set to
false, prevents the hidden "UTF8 enforcer" field from appearing in the output.
This commit implements the same behavior for `form_for`.
Stems from https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/17685#issuecomment-63871395
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[ci skip]
89ff1f8 and 1de258e6 removed from the HTML generated by the form helpers
the <div> that was wrapping the field elements inside the <form>.
This commit updates the documentation of the methods to reflect the
two commits above.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
actionpack/lib/action_controller/metal/mime_responds.rb
actionview/lib/action_view/vendor/html-scanner/html/sanitizer.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/type/value.rb
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
[skip ci]
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| | |
Use #model_name on instances instead of classes
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This allows rails code to be more confdent when asking for a model name, instead of having to ask for the class.
Rails core discussion here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-core/ThSaXw9y1F8
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For some reason, if the hash is empty, we choose "optimized" routes. I
am not sure how or why optimized routes differ from regular routes.
But, if we make sure the hash is empty, we get a nice speed improvement.
|
| |
|
| |
|