| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
string
|
| |
|
|
| |
There're a lot of places in Rails source code which make a lot of sense to switching to Object#in? or Object#either? instead of using [].include?.
|
| |
|
|
| |
's/[ \t]*$//' -i {} \;)
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: wycats <wycats@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead, all Strings are always not html_safe?. Instead, you can get a SafeBuffer from a String by calling #html_safe, which will SafeBuffer.new(self).
* Additionally, instead of doing concat("</form>".html_safe), you can do
safe_concat("</form>"), which will skip both the flag set, and the flag
check.
* For the first pass, I converted virtually all #html_safe!s to #html_safe,
and the tests pass. A further optimization would be to try to use
#safe_concat as much as possible, reducing the performance impact if
we know up front that a String is safe.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This consists of:
* String#html_safe! a method to mark a string as 'safe'
* ActionView::SafeBuffer a string subclass which escapes anything unsafe which is concatenated to it
* Calls to String#html_safe! throughout the rails helpers
* a 'raw' helper which lets you concatenate trusted HTML from non-safety-aware sources (e.g. presantized strings in the DB)
* New ERB implementation based on erubis which uses a SafeBuffer instead of a String
Hat tip to Django for the inspiration.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Tests can be run in isolation
* Dependencies added
* A few tests modified to avoid depending on AS deps
not depended on my files they were testing
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
output in HTML pages. [rick]
git-svn-id: http://svn-commit.rubyonrails.org/rails/trunk@9241 5ecf4fe2-1ee6-0310-87b1-e25e094e27de
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: http://svn-commit.rubyonrails.org/rails/trunk@8564 5ecf4fe2-1ee6-0310-87b1-e25e094e27de
|
|
|
[fxn]
git-svn-id: http://svn-commit.rubyonrails.org/rails/trunk@8422 5ecf4fe2-1ee6-0310-87b1-e25e094e27de
|
