| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 7256cb53e0c34e510a4d59a50d120c0358cf1d99, reversing
changes made to 6ebe22c3ae716d089af1e5090ddb0d12b31af8ac.
Reason: A test was failing.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit e4b33b08d6d2b88b627b1e52c4f349e57c5b89fc.
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/7452#issuecomment-8094302
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Many named routes have keys that are required to successfully resolve. If a key is left off like this:
<%= link_to 'user', user_path %>
This will produce an error like this:
No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"users"}
Since we know that the :id is missing, we can add extra debugging information to the error message.
No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"users"} missing required keys: [:id]
This will help new and seasoned developers look closer at their parameters. I've also subclassed the routing error to be clear that this error is a result of attempting to generate a url and not because the user is trying to visit a bad url.
While this may sound trivial this error message is misleading and confuses most developers. The important part isn't what's in the options its's what's missing. Adding this information to the error message will make debugging much more obvious.
This is the sister pull request of https://github.com/rails/journey/pull/44 which will be required to get they missing keys into the correct error message.
Example Development Error in Rails: http://cl.ly/image/3S0T0n1T3421
|
| | |
|
|/
|
| |
There is no memcache gem left in repo.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
With a value of "nosniff", this prevents Internet Explorer from MIME-sniffing a response away from the declared content-type.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This pattern was introduced as a plugin by @dhh.
The original implementation can be found in
https://github.com/rails/routing_concerns
|
|
|
|
| |
their own header object
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When you mount your application at a path, for example /myapp, server
should set SCRIPT_NAME to /myapp. With such information, rails
application knows that it's mounted at /myapp path and it should generate
routes relative to that path.
Before this patch, rails handled SCRIPT_NAME correctly only for regular
apps, but it failed to do it for mounted engines. The solution was to
hardcode default_url_options[:script_name], which is not the best answer
- it will work only when application is mounted at a fixed path.
This patch fixes the situation by respecting original value of
SCRIPT_NAME when generating application's routes from engine and the
other way round - when you generate engine's routes from application.
This is done by using one of 2 pieces of information in env - current
SCRIPT_NAME or SCRIPT_NAME for a corresponding router. This is because
we have 2 cases to handle:
- generating engine's route from application: in this situation
SCRIPT_NAME is basically SCRIPT_NAME set by the server and it
indicates the place where application is mounted, so we can just pass
it as :original_script_name in url_options. :original_script_name is
used because if we use :script_name, router will ignore generating
prefix for engine
- generating application's route from engine: in this situation we
already lost information about the SCRIPT_NAME that server used. For
example if application is mounted at /myapp and engine is mounted at
/blog, at this point SCRIPT_NAME is equal /myapp/blog. Because of that
we need to keep reference to /myapp SCRIPT_NAME by binding it to the
current router. Later on we can extract it and use when generating url
Please note that starting from now you *should not* use
default_url_options[:script_name] explicitly if your server already
passes correct SCRIPT_NAME to rack env.
(closes #6933)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
by Active Support)
Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails
made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base.
After some discussion in
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d
we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough
for this particular idiom.
In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes
include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the
way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case
statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked
the most in each case.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes #7110 there's more work to do on rack-cache issue 69
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since #5581 added support for resources with custom params we should
not assume that it is :id when using shallow resource routing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Mapper looks for a :id constraint in the scope to see whether it
should apply a constraint for nested resources. Since #5581 added support
for resource params other than :id, we need to check for a constraint on
the parent resource's param name and not assume it's :id.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Optional segments with a root scope need to have the leading slash
outside of the parentheses, otherwise the generated url will be empty.
However if the route has non-optional elements then the leading slash
needs to remain inside the parentheses otherwise the generated url
will have two leading slashes, e.g:
Blog::Application.routes.draw do
get '/(:category)', :to => 'posts#index', :as => :root
get '/(:category)/author/:name', :to => 'posts#author', :as => :author
end
$ rake routes
root GET /(:category)(.:format) posts#index
author GET (/:category)/author/:name(.:format) posts#author
This change adds support for optional segments that contain a slash,
allowing support for urls like /page/2 for the root path, e.g:
Blog::Application.routes.draw do
get '/(page/:page)', :to => 'posts#index', :as => :root
end
$ rake routes
root GET /(page/:page)(.:format) posts#index
Fixes #7073
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow the consistency defined in dbc43bc.
|
|
|
|
| |
this is so we can show route output in the development when we get a routing error. Railties can use features of ActionDispatch, but ActionDispatch should not depend on Railties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Assuming the type ":touch", Collector.new was calling
send(:touch), which instead of triggering method_missing
and generating a new collector method, actually
invoked the private method `touch` inherited from
Object.
By generating the method for each mime type as it
is registered, the private methods on Object can
never be reached by `send`, because the `Collector`
will have them before `send` is called on it.
To do this, a callback mechanism was added to Mime::Type
This allows someone to add a callback for whenever
a new mime type is registered. The callback then
gets called with the new mime as a parameter.
This is then used in AbstractController::Collector
to generate new collector methods after each mime
is registered.
|
|
|
|
| |
Related with 5e7d6bba79393de0279917f93b82f3b7b176f4b5
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* master-sec:
Strip [nil] from parameters hash. Thanks to Ben Murphy for reporting this!
predicate builder should not recurse for determining where columns. Thanks to Ben Murphy for reporting this
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Thanks to Ben Murphy for reporting this!
CVE-2012-2660
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
| |
ActionDispatch::Request::Session#values
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Passing path parameters with invalid encoding is likely to trigger errors
further on like `ArgumentError (invalid byte sequence in UTF-8)`. This will
result in a 500 error whereas the better error to return is a 400 error which
allows exception notification libraries to filter it out if they wish.
Closes #4450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently Rack raises a TypeError when it encounters a malformed or
ambiguous hash like `foo[]=bar&foo[4]=bar`. Rather than pass this
through to the application this commit captures the exception and
re-raises it using a new ActionController::BadRequest exception.
The new ActionController::BadRequest exception returns a 400 error
instead of the 500 error that would've been returned by the original
TypeError. This allows exception notification libraries to ignore
these errors if so desired.
Closes #3051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before this change, assert_recognizes, assert_generates, and
assert_routing raised ActionController::RoutingError when they failed to
recognize the route.
This commit changes them to raise Assertion instead. This aligns with
convention for logical failures, and supports reporting tools that care
about the difference between logical failures and errors e.g. the
summary at the end of a test run.
- Fixes #5899
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The docs suggest that the middleware stack is an Array, so I've added
the unshift method to it. Originally I added some more Array methods,
but it was agreed that they lacked usecases.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|