| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| | |
Fix AC::Parameters#to_unsafe_h to return all unfiltered values
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
- AC::Parameters#convert_parameters_to_hashes should return filtered or
unfiltered values based on whether it is called from `to_h` or `to_unsafe_h`
instead of always defaulting to `to_h`.
- Fixes #22841
|
| |/
|
|
| |
- Test should call `to_unsafe_h` instead of `to_h`
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fixes #22818
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When calling `to_h` on an `ActionController::Parameters` instance it would
`deep_dup` its internal parameters.
This inadvertently called `dup` on a passed Active Record model which would
create new models. Fix by only dupping Ruby's Arrays and Hashes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes these two methods to be more inline with the previous
behavior of Parameters as Parameters used to be inherited from HWIA.
Fixes #21391
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This clears the transaction record state when the transaction finishes
with a `:committed` status.
Considering the following example where `name` is a required attribute.
Before we had `new_record?` returning `true` for a persisted record:
```ruby
author = Author.create! name: 'foo'
author.name = nil
author.save # => false
author.new_record? # => true
```
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When executing an `ActionController::Parameters#fetch` with a block
that raises a `KeyError` the raised `KeyError` will be rescued and
converted to an `ActionController::ParameterMissing` exception,
covering up the original exception.
[Jonas Schubert Erlandsson & Roque Pinel]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is another take at #14384 as we decided to wait until `master` is
targeting Rails 5.0. This commit is implementation-complete, as it
guarantees that all the public methods on the hash-inherited Parameters
are still working (based on test case). We can decide to follow-up later
if we want to remove some methods out from Parameters.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As suggested in #16299([1]), this method should be a new public API for
retrieving unfiltered parameters from `ActionController::Parameters`
object, given that `Parameters#to_hash` will no longer work in Rails
5.0+ as we stop inheriting `Parameters` from `Hash`.
[1]: https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/16299#issuecomment-50220919
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is to make sure that `permitted` status is maintained on the
resulting object.
I found these methods that needs to be redefined by looking for
`self.class.new` in the code.
* extract!
* transform_keys
* transform_values
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`ActionController::Parameters#to_h` now returns a `Hash` with
unpermitted keys removed. This change is to reflect on a security
concern where some method performed on an `ActionController::Parameters`
may yield a `Hash` object which does not maintain `permitted?` status.
If you would like to get a `Hash` with all the keys intact, duplicate
and mark it as permitted before calling `#to_h`.
params = ActionController::Parameters.new(name: 'Senjougahara Hitagi')
params.to_h # => {}
unsafe_params = params.dup.permit!
unsafe_params.to_h # => {"name"=>"Senjougahara Hitagi"}
safe_params = params.permit(:name)
safe_params.to_h # => {"name"=>"Senjougahara Hitagi"}
This change is consider a stopgap as we cannot chage the code to stop
`ActionController::Parameters` to inherit from
`HashWithIndifferentAccess` in the next minor release.
Also, adding a CHANGELOG entry to mention that
`ActionController::Parameters` will not inheriting from
`HashWithIndifferentAccess` in the next major version.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This is a regression test for 29844dd.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We cannot cache keys because arrays are mutable. We rather want to cache
the arrays. This behaviour is tailor-made for the usage pattern strongs
params is designed for.
In a forthcoming commit I am going to add a test that covers why we need
to cache by value.
Every strong params instance has a live span of a request, the cache goes
away with the object. Since strong params have such a concrete intention,
it would be interesting to see if there are actually any real-world use
cases that are an actual leak, one that practically may matter.
I am not convinced that the theoretical leak has any practical consequences,
but if it can be shown there are, then I believe we should either get rid of
the cache (which is an optimization), or else wipe it in the mutating API.
This reverts commit e63be2769c039e4e9ada523a8497ce3206cc8a9b.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
memory leak demonstrated on @tenderlove's latest blog post:
http://tenderlovemaking.com/2014/06/02/yagni-methods-are-killing-me.html
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
#13382]
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
closes #12149
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
StrongParameters protection
|
| |
|
