| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The result of Generator with or without the @extras instance variable set contains the desired information. Rather than preserving state when initializing the original object, we can simply extract the keys from the resultant parameters.
ATP Actionpack, railties
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Many named routes have keys that are required to successfully resolve. If a key is left off like this:
<%= link_to 'user', user_path %>
This will produce an error like this:
No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"users"}
Since we know that the :id is missing, we can add extra debugging information to the error message.
No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"users"} missing required keys: [:id]
This will help new and seasoned developers look closer at their parameters. I've also subclassed the routing error to be clear that this error is a result of attempting to generate a url and not because the user is trying to visit a bad url.
While this may sound trivial this error message is misleading and confuses most developers. The important part isn't what's in the options its's what's missing. Adding this information to the error message will make debugging much more obvious.
This is the sister pull request of https://github.com/rails/journey/pull/44 which will be required to get they missing keys into the correct error message.
Example Development Error in Rails: http://cl.ly/image/3S0T0n1T3421
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Memcached to dalli for actionpack test.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
ActionDispatch::Routing::UrlFor was always required in UrlHelpers. This
was changed by splitting previous implementation of UrlHelper into 2
modules: ActionView::Helpers::UrlHelper and
ActionView::Routing::UrlHelper. The former one keeps only basic
implementation of url_for. The latter adds features that allow to use
routes and is only required when url_helpers or mounted_helpers are
required.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
| |
This is another step in moving Action View's dependencies in Action Pack
to Action View itself. Also, HtmlScanner seems to be better suited for
views rather than controllers.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new option allows any Ruby namespace to be registered and set
up for eager load. We are effectively exposing the structure existing
in Rails since v3.0 for all developers in order to make their applications
thread-safe and CoW friendly.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
With a value of "nosniff", this prevents Internet Explorer from MIME-sniffing a response away from the declared content-type.
|
| |
|
|
| |
in a prioritized order
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This pattern was introduced as a plugin by @dhh.
The original implementation can be found in
https://github.com/rails/routing_concerns
|
| |
|
|
| |
their own header object
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Move AD default_headers configurations to railtie
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
ActionDispatch railtie is a better place for
config.action_dispatch.default_headers settings, users can continue
overriding those settings in their configuration files if needed.
|
| |/
|
|
|
| |
Return the conditions from the keep_if call, and ignore the value
argument since it's not being used.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When you mount your application at a path, for example /myapp, server
should set SCRIPT_NAME to /myapp. With such information, rails
application knows that it's mounted at /myapp path and it should generate
routes relative to that path.
Before this patch, rails handled SCRIPT_NAME correctly only for regular
apps, but it failed to do it for mounted engines. The solution was to
hardcode default_url_options[:script_name], which is not the best answer
- it will work only when application is mounted at a fixed path.
This patch fixes the situation by respecting original value of
SCRIPT_NAME when generating application's routes from engine and the
other way round - when you generate engine's routes from application.
This is done by using one of 2 pieces of information in env - current
SCRIPT_NAME or SCRIPT_NAME for a corresponding router. This is because
we have 2 cases to handle:
- generating engine's route from application: in this situation
SCRIPT_NAME is basically SCRIPT_NAME set by the server and it
indicates the place where application is mounted, so we can just pass
it as :original_script_name in url_options. :original_script_name is
used because if we use :script_name, router will ignore generating
prefix for engine
- generating application's route from engine: in this situation we
already lost information about the SCRIPT_NAME that server used. For
example if application is mounted at /myapp and engine is mounted at
/blog, at this point SCRIPT_NAME is equal /myapp/blog. Because of that
we need to keep reference to /myapp SCRIPT_NAME by binding it to the
current router. Later on we can extract it and use when generating url
Please note that starting from now you *should not* use
default_url_options[:script_name] explicitly if your server already
passes correct SCRIPT_NAME to rack env.
(closes #6933)
|
| |\
| |
| | |
RouteSet: refactor internals
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
No need to build valid_conditions array.
We can get all the data in place.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
Introduce default_headers. closes #6311 #6515
|
| | |/ |
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
by Active Support)
Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails
made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base.
After some discussion in
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d
we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough
for this particular idiom.
In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes
include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the
way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case
statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked
the most in each case.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Passing options as the last value in an array doesn't work with form_for.
This reverts commit 61c8a4d926343903593a27080216af7e4ed81268.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Passing options as the last value in an array doesn't work with form_for.
This reverts commit 6be564c7a087773cb0b51c54396cc190e4f5c983.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Rather than keep the url options in record_or_hash_or_array, extract it
and reverse merge with options as it may contain important private keys
like `:routing_type`.
Closes #7259
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Generating an URL with an array of records is now able to build a query
string if the last item of the array is a hash.
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
activemodel/lib/active_model/secure_password.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/associations/collection_proxy.rb
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
Refactor ActionDispatch::Http::Cache::Response#cache_control_headers
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| | |
object
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
This file uses mattr_accessor.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
