| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|\
| |
| | |
Remove unnecessary include for integration tests.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Minitest has already been required when calling Minitest.autorun.
|
|/
|
|
| |
There are performance gains to be made by avoiding URI setter methods.
|
|\ |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
| |
renamed to `Minitest`
Ref: https://github.com/seattlerb/minitest/blob/master/History.txt
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Set ActionDispatch.test_app instead.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
minitest/autorun required minitest/spec and we are avoiding to require
it.
|
|
|
|
| |
https://github.com/seattlerb/minitest/commit/9a57c520ceac76abfe6105866f8548a94eb357b6#L15R8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit ad46884af567d6f8d6d8d777f372c39e81a560ba.
Conflicts:
actionpack/CHANGELOG.md
actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb
actionpack/test/controller/integration_test.rb
Reason: It will conflict with a lot of test cases. Better to call
`process` directly since this is a very uncommon HTTP method.
Fixes #10638.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The env hash passed to `Http::Headers#new` must be in env format.
Also be aware that the passed hash is modified directly.
docs and test-cases for setting headers/env in functional tests.
Follow up to #9700.
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes #6513.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
actionpack/lib/action_controller/metal/mime_responds.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb
guides/source/working_with_javascript_in_rails.md
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
| |
otherwise. See 94248ffe1e6f815b8ffab4eb752b60c1e4459d25.
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Fix a typo in AD
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
by Active Support)
Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails
made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base.
After some discussion in
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d
we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough
for this particular idiom.
In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes
include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the
way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case
statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked
the most in each case.
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In integration tests, you might want to use helpers from engines that
you mounted in your application. It's not hard to add it by yourself,
but it's unneeded boilerplate. mounted_helpers are now included by
default. That means that given engine mounted like:
mount Foo::Engine => "/foo", :as => "foo"
you will be able to use paths from this engine in tests this way:
foo.root_path #=> "/foo"
(closes #6573)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit improves the handling of default_url_options in integration
tests by making behave closer to how a real application operates.
Specifically the following issues have been addressed:
* Options specified in routes.rb are used (fixes #546)
* Options specified in controllers are used
* Request parameters are recalled correctly
* Tests can override default_url_options directly
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was a mix, sometimes patch first, sometimes put first.
Use always patch first, since this is going to be the
primary verb for updates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PATCH is the correct HTML verb to map to the #update action. The
semantics for PATCH allows for partial updates, whereas PUT requires a
complete replacement.
Changes:
* adds config.default_method_for_update you can set to :patch
* optionally use PATCH instead of PUT in resource routes and forms
* adds the #patch verb to routes to detect PATCH requests
* adds #patch? to Request
* changes documentation and comments to indicate support for PATCH
This change maintains complete backwards compatibility by keeping :put
as the default for config.default_method_for_update.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
set AD::IntegrationTest.app in railtie initializer
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 0e4748cd415660eb91e63d50aa15cdd027c612dd.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After a long list of discussion about the performance problem from using varargs and the reason that we can't find a great pair for it, it would be best to remove support for it for now.
It will come back if we can find a good pair for it. For now, Bon Voyage, `#among?`.
|
|
|
|
| |
suggestion!
|
|
|
|
| |
There're a lot of places in Rails source code which make a lot of sense to switching to Object#in? or Object#either? instead of using [].include?.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
since Runner uses method_missing to delegate to the integration session it also should define respond_to? accordingly
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
everyone calls super as expected.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|