| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
#27715 [ci skip] (#27730)
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This was preventing the test suite from being run in isolation
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
s/Constrains/Constraints
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
#26606
Rails routes (even rake routes in previous versions) output showed incorrect routes when an application use resource :controller, implying that edit_controller_path match with controller#show.
The order of the output has changed to correct this. View #26606 for more information.
Added a test case, change unit test in rake to expect the new output.
Since the output of resource :controller is changing, the string spected of the railties/test/application/rake_test.rb test_rails_routes_with_controller_environment had to be modified.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Regexp#match? should be considered to be part of the Ruby core library. We are
emulating it for < 2.4, but not having to require the extension is part of the
illusion of the emulation.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
`ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper#match`
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
`ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper#match`
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Currently a misleading "missing required keys" error is thrown when a param
fails to match the constraints of a particular route. This commit ensures that
these params are recognised as unmatching rather than missing.
Note: this means that a different error message will be provided between
optimized and non-optimized path helpers, due to the fact that the former does
not check constraints when matching routes.
Fixes #26470.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
All indentation was normalized by rubocop auto-correct at 80e66cc4d90bf8c15d1a5f6e3152e90147f00772.
But comments was still kept absolute position. This commit aligns
comments with method definitions for consistency.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This was almost every case where we are overriding `respond_to?` in a
way that mirrors a parallel implementation of `method_missing`. There is
one remaining case in Active Model that should probably do the same
thing, but had a sufficiently strange implementation that I want to
investigate it separately.
Fixes #26333.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The PR #20940 enabled the use of multiple roots with different constraints
at the top level but unfortunately didn't work when those roots were inside
a namespace and also broke the use of root inside a namespace after a top
level root was defined because the check for the existence of the named route
used the global :root name and not the namespaced name.
This is fixed by using the name_for_action method to expand the :root name to
the full namespaced name. We can pass nil for the second argument as we're not
dealing with resource definitions so don't need to handle the cases for edit
and new routes.
Fixes #26148.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Those methods are only using inside this module and by a private method
so they all should be private.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Since e852daa6976cc6b6b28ad0c80a188c06e226df3c only the verb methods
where extracting the defaults options. It was merged a fix for the
`root` method in 31fbbb7faccba25b2e3b5e10b8fca1468579d629 but `match`
was still broken since `:defaults` where not extracted.
This was causing routes defined using `match` and having the `:defaults`
keys to not be recognized.
To fix this it was extracted a new private method with the actual
content of `match` and the `:defaults` extracting was moved to `match`.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Style/SpaceBeforeBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideHashLiteralBraces
Fix all violations in the repository.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix keyed defaults with root
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The merging of the 'defaults' option was moved up the stack in e852daa
This allows us to see where these options originate from the standard
HttpHelpers (get, post, patch, put, delete)
Unfortunately this move didn't incorporate the 'root' method, which has
always allowed the same 'defaults' option before.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Check for any non-UTF8 characters in path parameters at the point they're
set in `env`. Previously they were checked for when used to get a controller
class, but this meant routes that went directly to a Rack app, or skipped
controller instantiation for some other reason, had to defend against
non-UTF8 characters themselves.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
In Rails 4 these kind of routes used to work:
```ruby
scope '/*id', controller: :builds, as: :build do
get action: :show
end
```
But since 1a830cbd830c7f80936dff7e3c8b26f60dcc371d, routes are only created for
paths specified as strings or symbols. Implicit `nil` paths are just ignored,
with no deprecation warnings or errors. Routes are simply not created. This come
as a surprise for people migrating to Rails 5, since the lack of logs or errors
makes hard to understand where the problem is.
This commit introduces a deprecation warning in case of path as `nil`, while
still allowing the route definition.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fixes #25488
97d7dc4 introduced a regression that resulted in ArgumentError when to
was in options of the scope and not of particular route.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Forgotten followup to #23669 :grimacing:
If you went to an internal route (e.g. `/rails/info/routes`), you would
previously see the following in your logger:
```bash
Processing by Rails::InfoController#routes as HTML
Parameters: {"internal"=>true}
Rendering /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/railties/lib/rails/templates/rails/info/routes.html.erb within layouts/application
Rendered collection of /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/routes/_route.html.erb [2 times] (10.5ms)
Rendered /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/routes/_table.html.erb (2.5ms)
Rendered /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/railties/lib/rails/templates/rails/info/routes.html.erb within layouts/application (23.5ms)
Completed 200 OK in 50ms (Views: 35.1ms | ActiveRecord: 0.0ms)
```
Now, with this change, you would see:
```bash
Processing by Rails::InfoController#routes as HTML
Rendering /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/railties/lib/rails/templates/rails/info/routes.html.erb within layouts/application
Rendered collection of /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/routes/_route.html.erb [2 times] (1.6ms)
Rendered /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/routes/_table.html.erb (10.2ms)
Rendered /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/railties/lib/rails/templates/rails/info/routes.html.erb within layouts/application (17.4ms)
Completed 200 OK in 44ms (Views: 28.0ms | ActiveRecord: 0.0ms)
```
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Ruby 2.4 unifies Fixnum and Bignum into Integer: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12005
* Forward compat with new unified Integer class in Ruby 2.4+.
* Backward compat with separate Fixnum/Bignum in Ruby 2.2 & 2.3.
* Drops needless Fixnum distinction in docs, preferring Integer.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
I always appreciate having a bit more information as to why something is
now an error. We can use this error to tell people why what they were
previously doing is insecure and give them hints on how to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Kasper Timm Hansen <kaspth@gmail.com>
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | | |
Refactor handling of :action default in routing
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The longstanding convention in Rails is that if the :action parameter
is missing or nil then it defaults to 'index'. Up until Rails 5.0.0.beta1
this was handled slightly differently than other routing defaults by
deleting it from the route options and adding it to the recall parameters.
With the recent focus of removing unnecessary duplications this has
exposed a problem in this strategy - we are now mutating the request's
path parameters and causing problems for later url generation. This will
typically affect url_for rather a named url helper since the latter
explicitly pass :controller, :action, etc.
The fix is to add a default for :action in the route class if the path
contains an :action segment and no default is passed. This change also
revealed an issue with the parameterized part expiry in that it doesn't
follow a right to left order - as soon as a dynamic segment is required
then all other segments become required.
Fixes #23019.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
samphilipd/sam/do_not_clobber_options_in_route_definitions
Do not destructively mutate passed options hash in route definitions
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
- Fixes #24030
An example scope might be specified as such:
```ruby
HTML = { constraints: { format: :html } }.freeze
scope HTML do
get 'x'
end
```
This currently raises an error because the mapper attempts to
destructively modify the passed options hash. This is dangerous because
this options hash might even be shared with other scopes.
We should instead always instantiate a new object instead of modifying
the passed options.
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
- we are ending sentences properly
- fixing of space issues
- fixed continuity issues in some sentences.
Reverts https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/8fc97d198ef31c1d7a4b9b849b96fc08a667fb02 .
This change reverts making sure we add '.' at end of deprecation sentences.
This is to keep sentences within Rails itself consistent and with a '.' at the end.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Follow-up to #23980.
- Fix grammar: "be remove" -> "be removed".
- Wrap lines at 80 chars.
Lurvely ;-)
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Allowing :controller and :action values to be specified via the path
in config/routes.rb has been an underlying cause of a number of issues
in Rails that have resulted in security releases. In light of this it's
better that controllers and actions are explicitly whitelisted rather
than trying to blacklist or sanitize 'bad' values.
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is meant to provide a way for Action Cable, Sprockets, and possibly
other Rack applications to mark themselves as internal, and to exclude
themselves from the routing inspector, and thus `rails routes` / `rake
routes`.
I think this is the only way to have mounted Rack apps be marked as
internal, within AD/Journey. Another option would be to create an array
of regexes for internal apps, and then to iterate over that everytime a
request comes through. Also, I only had the first `add_route` method set
`internal`'s default to false, to avoid littering it all over the
codebase.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
