aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/routing
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
* Fix marking of custom routes for JourneyAndrew White2016-01-201-14/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | The Mapper build_path method marks routes where path parameters are part of a path segment as custom routes by altering the regular expression, e.g: get '/foo-:bar', to: 'foo#bar' There were some edge cases where certain constructs weren't being picked up and this commit fixes those. Fixes #23069.
* Revert "Remove literal? check to fix issue with prefixed optionals"eileencodes2016-01-201-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 5d1b7c3b441654e8008dcd303f5367883ec660a6. The change here didn't actually fix the issue it was trying to fix, and this isn't the correct way to fix either issue. The problem is switching from the builder to grouping with find_all/regex is now very dependent on how you structure your path pattern.
* Remove literal? check to fix issue with prefixed optionalseileencodes2016-01-161-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In commit d993cb3 `build_path` was changed from using `grep` to `find_all` to save array allocations. This change was a little too aggressive in that when the dash comes before the symbol like `/omg-:song` the symbol is skipped. Removing the check for `n.right.left.literal?` fixes this issue, but does add back some allocations. The number of allocations are still well less than before. I've added a regression test to test this behavior for the future. Fixes #23069. Array allocations as of d993cb3: ``` {:T_SYMBOL=>11} {:T_REGEXP=>17} {:T_STRUCT=>6500} {:T_MATCH=>12004} {:T_OBJECT=>91009} {:T_DATA=>100088} {:T_HASH=>114013} {:T_STRING=>159637} {:T_ARRAY=>321056} {:T_IMEMO=>351133} ``` Array allocations after this change: ``` {:T_SYMBOL=>11} {:T_REGEXP=>1017} {:T_STRUCT=>6500} {:T_MATCH=>12004} {:T_DATA=>84092} {:T_OBJECT=>87009} {:T_HASH=>110015} {:T_STRING=>166152} {:T_ARRAY=>322056} {:T_NODE=>343558} ```
* Better error message when running `rake routes` with CONTROLLER arg:Edouard CHIN2016-01-071-7/+18
| | | | | | | - `CONTROLLER` argument can now be supplied in different ways (Rails::WelcomeController, Rails::Welcome, rails/welcome) - If `CONTROLLER` argument was supplied but it does not exist, will warn the user that this controller does not exist - If `CONTROLLER` argument was supplied and no routes could be found matching this filter, will warn the user that no routes were found matching the supplied filter - If no routes were defined in the config/routes.rb file, will warn the user with the original message
* Merge pull request #20109 from prathamesh-sonpatki/keep-only-one-rootKasper Timm Hansen2016-01-071-21/+21
|\ | | | | Remove original root method from Base module and kept overridden implementation in Resources module.
| * Kept overridden root method and removed original methodPrathamesh Sonpatki2016-01-071-21/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - The root method is defined and documented in Base module and decorated in Resources module. - The documentation in Base module actually talks about method signature of decorated method from Resources module. - Argument handling was moved to decorated method in https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/977455cc2efb94f40b4c0d46d1842be198ed7c4c to handle options such as :as with directly passed path parameter. - To avoid the confusion, removed original root method from Base module and only kept overridden version in Resources module. - References - https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/12208 & https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/12208#issuecomment-24350897.
* | Allow AC::Parameters as an argument to url_helpersPrathamesh Sonpatki2016-01-071-2/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Earlier only Hash was allowed as params argument to url_helpers. - Now ActionController::Parameters instances will also be allowed. - If the params are not secured then it will raise an ArgumentError to indicate that constructing URLs with non-secure params is not recommended. - Fixes #22832.
* | Merge pull request #20797 from byroot/prevent-url-for-ac-parametersRafael França2015-12-181-1/+4
|\ \ | | | | | | Prevent ActionController::Parameters in url_for
| * | Prevent ActionController::Parameters from being passed to url_for directlyJean Boussier2015-12-151-1/+4
| |/
* / Don't catch all NameError to reraise as ActionController::RoutingError #22368Maxime Garcia2015-12-121-2/+4
|/
* Merge pull request #22373 from yui-knk/ad_constraintsYves Senn2015-11-301-1/+1
|\ | | | | Add `Routing` namespace to point appropriate constant
| * Add `Routing` namespace to point appropriate constantyui-knk2015-11-221-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Make it clear we use `ActionDispatch::Routing::Endpoint`
* | Brush up errors of `ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper#mount`yui-knk2015-11-281-6/+9
|/ | | | | | * Integrate to raise `ArgumentError` * Detailed error message when `path` is not defined * Add a test case, invalid rack app is passed
* Remove arity check for `RouteSet#draw`yui-knk2015-11-211-4/+0
| | | | | This code was added for migration from Rails 3.1 to upper, now we are developing Rails 5.
* remove unnecessary forwardable requireTimo Schilling2015-10-211-1/+0
| | | `Forwardable` has been used in the past
* Delete needless `require 'active_support/deprecation'`yui-knk2015-10-201-1/+0
| | | | | When `require 'active_support/rails'`, 'active_support/deprecation' is automatically loaded.
* Merge pull request #21849 from yui-knk/refactor_regexp_to_stringAndrew White2015-10-121-4/+0
|\ | | | | Change `Journey::Route#verb` to return string instead of regexp.
| * Change `Journey::Route#verb` to return string instead of regexp.yui-knk2015-10-031-4/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | By [this commit](https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/0b476de445faf330c58255e2ec3eea0f3a7c1bfc) `Journey::Route#verb` need not to return verb as regexp. The returned value is used by inspector, so change it to be a string. Add inspect_with_multiple_verbs test case to keep the behavior of inspector correctly.
* | Allow multiple `root` routes in same scope levelRafael Sales2015-10-101-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When an application has multiple root entries with different constraints, the current solution is to use `get '/'`. Example: **Currently I have to do:** ```ruby get '/', to: 'portfolio#show', constraints: ->(req) { Hostname.portfolio_site?(req.host) } get '/', to: 'blog#show', constraints: ->(req) { Hostname.blog_site?(req.host) } root 'landing#show' ``` **But I would like to do:** ```ruby root 'portfolio#show', constraints: ->(req) { Hostname.portfolio_site?(req.host) } root 'blog#show', constraints: ->(req) { Hostname.blog_site?(req.host) } root 'landing#show' ``` Other URL matchers such as `get`, `post`, etc, already allows this, so I think it's fair that `root` also allow it since it's just a shortcut for a `get` internally.
* | Fix mounted engine named routes regressionMatthew Erhard2015-10-072-2/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When generating the url for a mounted engine through its proxy, the path should be the sum of three parts: 1. Any `SCRIPT_NAME` request header or the value of `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#relative_url_root`. 2. A prefix (the engine's mounted path). 3. The path of the named route inside the engine. Since commit https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/44ff0313c121f528a68b3bd21d6c7a96f313e3d3, this has been broken. Step 2 has been changed to: 2. A prefix (the value of `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#relative_url_root` + the engine's mounted path). The value of `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#relative_url_root` is taken into account in step 1 of the route generation and should be ignored when generating the mounted engine's prefix in step 2. This commit fixes the regression by having `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#url_for` check `options[:relative_url_root]` before falling back to `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#relative_url_root`. The prefix generating code then sets `options[:relative_url_root]` to an empty string. This empty string is used instead of `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#relative_url_root` and avoids the duplicate `relative_url_root` value in the final result. This resolves #20920 and resolves #21459
* | [ci skip] Change 'an URL' to 'a URL' as URL doesn't have a vowel soundtanmay30112015-10-062-2/+2
|/
* `url_for` does not modify polymorphic optionsBernerd Schaefer2015-09-041-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The `url_for` methods in `actionpack` and `actionview` now make a copy of the provided options before generating polymorphic paths or URLs. The bug in the previous behavior is most noticeable in a case like: url_options = [:new, :post, param: 'value'] if current_page?(url_options) css_class = "active" end link_to "New Post", url_options, class: css_class
* Remove not used requiresMarcin Olichwirowicz2015-09-011-3/+1
|
* provide a request and response to all controllersAaron Patterson2015-08-251-4/+6
| | | | | | | | | | Controllers should always have a request and response when responding. Since we make this The Rule(tm), then controllers don't need to be somewhere in limbo between "asking a response object for a rack response" or "I, myself contain a rack response". This duality leads to conditionals spread through the codebase that we can delete: * https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/85a78d9358aa728298cd020cdc842b55c16f9549/actionpack/lib/action_controller/metal.rb#L221-L223
* adding a direct dispatch method to controller classesAaron Patterson2015-08-251-1/+1
| | | | This saves a lambda and request allocation on each request.
* always dispatch to controllers the same wayAaron Patterson2015-08-252-7/+25
| | | | | controllers should always go through the `action` class method so that their middleware is respected.
* always return a controller class from the `controller_class` methodAaron Patterson2015-08-251-3/+1
| | | | | now the caller can just treat it like a regular controller even though it will return a 404
* pull up dispatcher allocationAaron Patterson2015-08-242-5/+1
| | | | | the dispatcher class isn't configurable anymore, so pull up allocation to the method that needs it.
* directly ask the request for the controller classAaron Patterson2015-08-241-6/+1
| | | | | | Now that we don't have subclasses depending on this method (they augment the request class instead of the dispatch class) we can remove this method and directly ask the request object for the controller class
* remove useless ivarAaron Patterson2015-08-241-2/+1
|
* remove setter for the dispatcher classAaron Patterson2015-08-241-2/+2
| | | | we don't need it anymore. We always use the same dispatcher in tests.
* use a custom request class to determine the controller classAaron Patterson2015-08-241-2/+7
| | | | | | controller class resolution has been moved to the request object, so we should override that method instead of relying on the RouteSet to generate the controller class.
* Remove unused block argumentsdeepj2015-08-231-2/+2
|
* Fix Railties test failure for asset routeseileencodes2015-08-221-1/+5
| | | | | | | | | Since none of the action pack tests failed without this conditional it didn't seem necessary. This fixes the build because it correctly returns a 404 instead of a 500 for the asset routes test. Test that was failing was in the `assets_test.rb` file and was the test named `test_assets_routes_are_not_drawn_when_compilation_is_disabled`.
* Refactor to remove controller class from route to requesteileencodes2015-08-221-40/+8
| | | | | | | | | | This refactoring moves the controller class name that was on the route set to the request. The purpose of this refactoring is for changes we need to move controller tests to integration tests, mainly being able to access the controller on the request instead of having to go through the router. [Eileen M. Uchitelle & Aaron Patterson]
* Remove unnecessary cachingeileencodes2015-08-211-5/+1
| | | | | | | `ActiveSupport::Dependencies.constantize(const_name)` calls `Reference.new` which is defined as `ActiveSupport::Dependencies.constantize(const_name)` meaning this call is already cached and we're doing caching that isn't necessary.
* set route precedence at allocation timeAaron Patterson2015-08-201-2/+2
| | | | This way we can make the Route object a read-only data structure.
* make the routes reader privateAaron Patterson2015-08-181-0/+1
| | | | | nobody should be touching the routes hash without going through the NamedRouteCollection object.
* don't touch internalsAaron Patterson2015-08-181-1/+1
| | | | | We shouldn't be messing with the NamedRouteCollection internals. Just ask the object if the named route is in there.
* drop array allocations when building pathsAaron Patterson2015-08-181-8/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ```ruby require 'action_pack' require 'action_dispatch' require 'benchmark/ips' route_set = ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet.new routes = ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper.new route_set ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.setup(%i{path line type}) result = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.trace do 500.times do routes.resources :foo end end sorted = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.allocated_count_table.sort_by(&:last) sorted.each do |k,v| next if v == 0 p k => v end __END__ Before: {:T_SYMBOL=>11} {:T_REGEXP=>17} {:T_STRUCT=>6500} {:T_MATCH=>12004} {:T_OBJECT=>99009} {:T_DATA=>100088} {:T_HASH=>122015} {:T_STRING=>159637} {:T_IMEMO=>363134} {:T_ARRAY=>433056} After: {:T_SYMBOL=>11} {:T_REGEXP=>17} {:T_STRUCT=>6500} {:T_MATCH=>12004} {:T_OBJECT=>91009} {:T_DATA=>100088} {:T_HASH=>114013} {:T_STRING=>159637} {:T_ARRAY=>321056} {:T_IMEMO=>351133} ```
* use the strategy pattern to match request verbsAaron Patterson2015-08-171-10/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Rather than building a regexp for every route, lets use the strategy pattern to select among objects that can match HTTP verbs. This commit introduces strategy objects for each verb that has a predicate method on the request object like `get?`, `post?`, etc. When we build the route object, look up the strategy for the verbs the user specified. If we can't find it, fall back on string matching. Using a strategy / null object pattern (the `All` VerbMatcher is our "null" object in this case) we can: 1) Remove conditionals 2) Drop boot time allocations 2) Drop run time allocations 3) Improve runtime performance Here is our boot time allocation benchmark: ```ruby require 'action_pack' require 'action_dispatch' route_set = ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet.new routes = ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper.new route_set result = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.trace do 500.times do routes.resources :foo end end sorted = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.allocated_count_table.sort_by(&:last) sorted.each do |k,v| next if v == 0 p k => v end __END__ Before: $ be ruby -rallocation_tracer route_test.rb {:T_SYMBOL=>11} {:T_REGEXP=>4017} {:T_STRUCT=>6500} {:T_MATCH=>12004} {:T_DATA=>84092} {:T_OBJECT=>99009} {:T_HASH=>122015} {:T_STRING=>216652} {:T_IMEMO=>355137} {:T_ARRAY=>441057} After: $ be ruby -rallocation_tracer route_test.rb {:T_SYMBOL=>11} {:T_REGEXP=>17} {:T_STRUCT=>6500} {:T_MATCH=>12004} {:T_DATA=>84092} {:T_OBJECT=>99009} {:T_HASH=>122015} {:T_STRING=>172647} {:T_IMEMO=>355136} {:T_ARRAY=>433056} ``` This benchmark adds 500 resources. Each resource has 8 routes, so it adds 4000 routes. You can see from the results that this patch eliminates 4000 Regexp allocations, ~44000 String allocations, and ~8000 Array allocations. With that, we can figure out that the previous code would allocate 1 regexp, 11 strings, and 2 arrays per route *more* than this patch in order to handle verb matching. Next lets look at runtime allocations: ```ruby require 'action_pack' require 'action_dispatch' require 'benchmark/ips' route_set = ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet.new routes = ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper.new route_set routes.resources :foo route = route_set.routes.first request = ActionDispatch::Request.new("REQUEST_METHOD" => "GET") result = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.trace do 500.times do route.matches? request end end sorted = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.allocated_count_table.sort_by(&:last) sorted.each do |k,v| next if v == 0 p k => v end __END__ Before: $ be ruby -rallocation_tracer route_test.rb {:T_MATCH=>500} {:T_STRING=>501} {:T_IMEMO=>1501} After: $ be ruby -rallocation_tracer route_test.rb {:T_IMEMO=>1001} ``` This benchmark runs 500 calls against the `matches?` method on the route object. We check this method in the case that there are two methods that match the same path, but they are differentiated by the verb (or other conditionals). For example `POST /users` vs `GET /users`, same path, different action. Previously, we were using regexps to match against the verb. You can see that doing the regexp match would allocate 1 match object and 1 string object each time it was called. This patch eliminates those allocations. Next lets look at runtime performance. ```ruby require 'action_pack' require 'action_dispatch' require 'benchmark/ips' route_set = ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet.new routes = ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper.new route_set routes.resources :foo route = route_set.routes.first match = ActionDispatch::Request.new("REQUEST_METHOD" => "GET") no_match = ActionDispatch::Request.new("REQUEST_METHOD" => "POST") Benchmark.ips do |x| x.report("match") do route.matches? match end x.report("no match") do route.matches? no_match end end __END__ Before: $ be ruby -rallocation_tracer runtime.rb Calculating ------------------------------------- match 17.145k i/100ms no match 24.244k i/100ms ------------------------------------------------- match 259.708k (± 4.3%) i/s - 1.303M no match 453.376k (± 5.9%) i/s - 2.279M After: $ be ruby -rallocation_tracer runtime.rb Calculating ------------------------------------- match 23.958k i/100ms no match 29.402k i/100ms ------------------------------------------------- match 465.063k (± 3.8%) i/s - 2.324M no match 691.956k (± 4.5%) i/s - 3.469M ``` This tests tries to see how many times it can match a request per second. Switching to method calls and string comparison makes the successful match case about 79% faster, and the unsuccessful case about 52% faster. That was fun!
* switch Route constructors and pass in the regexpAaron Patterson2015-08-171-9/+15
| | | | | We don't need to add and delete from the conditions hash anymore, just pass the regexp directly to the constructor.
* introduce an alternate constructor for Route objectsAaron Patterson2015-08-171-1/+1
| | | | | I want to change the real constructor to take a particular parameter for matching the request method
* default pattern to use a joined stringAaron Patterson2015-08-171-1/+3
| | | | | The string we create is almost always the same, so rather than joining all the time, lets join once, then reuse that string everywhere.
* move route allocation to a factory method on the mapping objectAaron Patterson2015-08-151-0/+12
| | | | | | I would like to change the signature of the Route constructor. Since the mapping object has all the data required to construct a Route object, move the allocation to a factory method.
* only process `via` onceAaron Patterson2015-08-151-5/+3
| | | | | we can directly turn it in to a regular expression here, so we don't need to test its value twice
* only keep one hash of named routesAaron Patterson2015-08-141-1/+2
| | | | | The outer router object already keeps a hash of named routes, so we should just use that.
* rm add_route2Aaron Patterson2015-08-141-1/+1
| | | | | refactor the tests with a backwards compatible method call so we can rm add_route2 from the journey router
* pass pass the mapping object down the add_route stackAaron Patterson2015-08-142-53/+60
| | | | | then we can let the mapping object derive stuff that the Route object needs.
* pass the mapping object to build_routeAaron Patterson2015-08-142-10/+10
| | | | | now that we aren't doing options manipulations, we can just pass the mapping object down and read values from it.