| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We sometimes say "✂️ newline after `private`" in a code review (e.g.
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/18546#discussion_r23188776,
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/34832#discussion_r244847195).
Now `Layout/EmptyLinesAroundAccessModifier` cop have new enforced style
`EnforcedStyle: only_before` (https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/pull/7059).
That cop and enforced style will reduce the our code review cost.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since Rails 6.0 will support Ruby 2.4.1 or higher
`# frozen_string_literal: true` magic comment is enough to make string object frozen.
This magic comment is enabled by `Style/FrozenStringLiteralComment` cop.
* Exclude these files not to auto correct false positive `Regexp#freeze`
- 'actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/journey/router/utils.rb'
- 'activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/sqlite3_adapter.rb'
It has been fixed by https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/pull/6333
Once the newer version of RuboCop released and available at Code Climate these exclude entries should be removed.
* Replace `String#freeze` with `String#-@` manually if explicit frozen string objects are required
- 'actionpack/test/controller/test_case_test.rb'
- 'activemodel/test/cases/type/string_test.rb'
- 'activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/string/strip.rb'
- 'activesupport/test/core_ext/string_ext_test.rb'
- 'railties/test/generators/actions_test.rb'
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The method 'polymorphic_path' is not using 'polymorphic_url'
with `routing_type: :path` anymore in polymorphic_routes.rb
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 3420a14590c0e6915d8b6c242887f74adb4120f9, reversing
changes made to afb66a5a598ce4ac74ad84b125a5abf046dcf5aa.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not all requirements can be expressed in terms of polymorphic url
options so add a `route_for` method that allows calling another
direct route (or regular named route) which a set of arguments, e.g:
resources :buckets
direct :recordable do |recording|
route_for(:bucket, recording.bucket)
end
direct :threadable do |threadable|
route_for(:recordable, threadable.parent)
end
This maintains the context of the original caller, e.g.
threadable_path(threadable) # => /buckets/1
threadable_url(threadable) # => http://example.com/buckets/1
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allow the use of `direct` to specify custom mappings for polymorphic_url, e.g:
resource :basket
direct(class: "Basket") { [:basket] }
This will then generate the following:
>> link_to "Basket", @basket
=> <a href="/basket">Basket</a>
More importantly it will generate the correct url when used with `form_for`.
Fixes #1769.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, if you tried to use form_for with a presenter object
that implements to_model, it would crash in
action_dispatch/routing/polymorphic_routes.rb when asking the presenter
whether it is .persisted?
Now, we always ask .persisted? of the to_model object instead.
This seems to been an issue since 1606fc9d840da869a60213bc889da6fcf1fdc431
Signed-off-by: Eugenia Dellapenna <eugenia.dellapenna@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The methods in these modules are not used anywhere. They used to be
invoked in polymorphic_routes.rb but their usage was removed in e821045.
What is your opinion about removing these methods?
They do belong to the public API, but in reality their code has already been duplicated to ActionView::ModelNaming, since they are used by methods like `dom_id` and `dom_class` to associated records with DOM elements (in
ActionView).
Please tell me if you think that removing this module is a good idea and,
in that case, if the PR is okay as it is, or you'd rather start by showing
a deprecation message, and remove the module in Rails 5.1.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fixes #17057
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Suppose you have two resources routed in the following manner:
```ruby
resources :blogs do
resources :posts
end
resources :posts
```
When using polymorphic resource routing like `url_for([@blog, @post])`, and `@blog` is `nil` Rails should still try to match the route to the top-level posts resource.
Fixes #16754
|
| |\
| |
| |
| | |
Use #model_name on instances instead of classes
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This allows rails code to be more confdent when asking for a model name, instead of having to ask for the class.
Rails core discussion here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-core/ThSaXw9y1F8
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
also avoid the case of calling `persisted?` on something that doesn't
respond to it
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
