| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
s/Constrains/Constraints
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#26606
Rails routes (even rake routes in previous versions) output showed incorrect routes when an application use resource :controller, implying that edit_controller_path match with controller#show.
The order of the output has changed to correct this. View #26606 for more information.
Added a test case, change unit test in rake to expect the new output.
Since the output of resource :controller is changing, the string spected of the railties/test/application/rake_test.rb test_rails_routes_with_controller_environment had to be modified.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Regexp#match? should be considered to be part of the Ruby core library. We are
emulating it for < 2.4, but not having to require the extension is part of the
illusion of the emulation.
|
|
|
|
| |
`ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper#match`
|
|
|
|
| |
`ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper#match`
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The PR #20940 enabled the use of multiple roots with different constraints
at the top level but unfortunately didn't work when those roots were inside
a namespace and also broke the use of root inside a namespace after a top
level root was defined because the check for the existence of the named route
used the global :root name and not the namespaced name.
This is fixed by using the name_for_action method to expand the :root name to
the full namespaced name. We can pass nil for the second argument as we're not
dealing with resource definitions so don't need to handle the cases for edit
and new routes.
Fixes #26148.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Those methods are only using inside this module and by a private method
so they all should be private.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since e852daa6976cc6b6b28ad0c80a188c06e226df3c only the verb methods
where extracting the defaults options. It was merged a fix for the
`root` method in 31fbbb7faccba25b2e3b5e10b8fca1468579d629 but `match`
was still broken since `:defaults` where not extracted.
This was causing routes defined using `match` and having the `:defaults`
keys to not be recognized.
To fix this it was extracted a new private method with the actual
content of `match` and the `:defaults` extracting was moved to `match`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Style/SpaceBeforeBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideHashLiteralBraces
Fix all violations in the repository.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Fix keyed defaults with root
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The merging of the 'defaults' option was moved up the stack in e852daa
This allows us to see where these options originate from the standard
HttpHelpers (get, post, patch, put, delete)
Unfortunately this move didn't incorporate the 'root' method, which has
always allowed the same 'defaults' option before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In Rails 4 these kind of routes used to work:
```ruby
scope '/*id', controller: :builds, as: :build do
get action: :show
end
```
But since 1a830cbd830c7f80936dff7e3c8b26f60dcc371d, routes are only created for
paths specified as strings or symbols. Implicit `nil` paths are just ignored,
with no deprecation warnings or errors. Routes are simply not created. This come
as a surprise for people migrating to Rails 5, since the lack of logs or errors
makes hard to understand where the problem is.
This commit introduces a deprecation warning in case of path as `nil`, while
still allowing the route definition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #25488
97d7dc4 introduced a regression that resulted in ArgumentError when to
was in options of the scope and not of particular route.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Forgotten followup to #23669 :grimacing:
If you went to an internal route (e.g. `/rails/info/routes`), you would
previously see the following in your logger:
```bash
Processing by Rails::InfoController#routes as HTML
Parameters: {"internal"=>true}
Rendering /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/railties/lib/rails/templates/rails/info/routes.html.erb within layouts/application
Rendered collection of /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/routes/_route.html.erb [2 times] (10.5ms)
Rendered /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/routes/_table.html.erb (2.5ms)
Rendered /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/railties/lib/rails/templates/rails/info/routes.html.erb within layouts/application (23.5ms)
Completed 200 OK in 50ms (Views: 35.1ms | ActiveRecord: 0.0ms)
```
Now, with this change, you would see:
```bash
Processing by Rails::InfoController#routes as HTML
Rendering /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/railties/lib/rails/templates/rails/info/routes.html.erb within layouts/application
Rendered collection of /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/routes/_route.html.erb [2 times] (1.6ms)
Rendered /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/routes/_table.html.erb (10.2ms)
Rendered /Users/jon/code/rails/rails/railties/lib/rails/templates/rails/info/routes.html.erb within layouts/application (17.4ms)
Completed 200 OK in 44ms (Views: 28.0ms | ActiveRecord: 0.0ms)
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ruby 2.4 unifies Fixnum and Bignum into Integer: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12005
* Forward compat with new unified Integer class in Ruby 2.4+.
* Backward compat with separate Fixnum/Bignum in Ruby 2.2 & 2.3.
* Drops needless Fixnum distinction in docs, preferring Integer.
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Refactor handling of :action default in routing
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The longstanding convention in Rails is that if the :action parameter
is missing or nil then it defaults to 'index'. Up until Rails 5.0.0.beta1
this was handled slightly differently than other routing defaults by
deleting it from the route options and adding it to the recall parameters.
With the recent focus of removing unnecessary duplications this has
exposed a problem in this strategy - we are now mutating the request's
path parameters and causing problems for later url generation. This will
typically affect url_for rather a named url helper since the latter
explicitly pass :controller, :action, etc.
The fix is to add a default for :action in the route class if the path
contains an :action segment and no default is passed. This change also
revealed an issue with the parameterized part expiry in that it doesn't
follow a right to left order - as soon as a dynamic segment is required
then all other segments become required.
Fixes #23019.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
samphilipd/sam/do_not_clobber_options_in_route_definitions
Do not destructively mutate passed options hash in route definitions
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
- Fixes #24030
An example scope might be specified as such:
```ruby
HTML = { constraints: { format: :html } }.freeze
scope HTML do
get 'x'
end
```
This currently raises an error because the mapper attempts to
destructively modify the passed options hash. This is dangerous because
this options hash might even be shared with other scopes.
We should instead always instantiate a new object instead of modifying
the passed options.
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
- we are ending sentences properly
- fixing of space issues
- fixed continuity issues in some sentences.
Reverts https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/8fc97d198ef31c1d7a4b9b849b96fc08a667fb02 .
This change reverts making sure we add '.' at end of deprecation sentences.
This is to keep sentences within Rails itself consistent and with a '.' at the end.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is meant to provide a way for Action Cable, Sprockets, and possibly
other Rack applications to mark themselves as internal, and to exclude
themselves from the routing inspector, and thus `rails routes` / `rake
routes`.
I think this is the only way to have mounted Rack apps be marked as
internal, within AD/Journey. Another option would be to create an array
of regexes for internal apps, and then to iterate over that everytime a
request comes through. Also, I only had the first `add_route` method set
`internal`'s default to false, to avoid littering it all over the
codebase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Mapper build_path method marks routes where path parameters are part
of a path segment as custom routes by altering the regular expression, e.g:
get '/foo-:bar', to: 'foo#bar'
There were some edge cases where certain constructs weren't being picked
up and this commit fixes those.
Fixes #23069.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 5d1b7c3b441654e8008dcd303f5367883ec660a6.
The change here didn't actually fix the issue it was trying to fix, and
this isn't the correct way to fix either issue. The problem is switching
from the builder to grouping with find_all/regex is now very dependent
on how you structure your path pattern.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In commit d993cb3 `build_path` was changed from using `grep` to
`find_all` to save array allocations.
This change was a little too aggressive in that when the dash comes
before the symbol like `/omg-:song` the symbol is skipped.
Removing the check for `n.right.left.literal?` fixes this issue, but
does add back some allocations. The number of allocations are still well
less than before.
I've added a regression test to test this behavior for the future.
Fixes #23069.
Array allocations as of d993cb3:
```
{:T_SYMBOL=>11}
{:T_REGEXP=>17}
{:T_STRUCT=>6500}
{:T_MATCH=>12004}
{:T_OBJECT=>91009}
{:T_DATA=>100088}
{:T_HASH=>114013}
{:T_STRING=>159637}
{:T_ARRAY=>321056}
{:T_IMEMO=>351133}
```
Array allocations after this change:
```
{:T_SYMBOL=>11}
{:T_REGEXP=>1017}
{:T_STRUCT=>6500}
{:T_MATCH=>12004}
{:T_DATA=>84092}
{:T_OBJECT=>87009}
{:T_HASH=>110015}
{:T_STRING=>166152}
{:T_ARRAY=>322056}
{:T_NODE=>343558}
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- The root method is defined and documented in Base module and
decorated in Resources module.
- The documentation in Base module actually talks about method
signature of decorated method from Resources module.
- Argument handling was moved to decorated method in
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/977455cc2efb94f40b4c0d46d1842be198ed7c4c
to handle options such as :as with directly passed path parameter.
- To avoid the confusion, removed original root method from Base module
and only kept overridden version in Resources module.
- References - https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/12208 &
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/12208#issuecomment-24350897.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Add `Routing` namespace to point appropriate constant
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Make it clear we use `ActionDispatch::Routing::Endpoint`
|
|/
|
|
|
|
| |
* Integrate to raise `ArgumentError`
* Detailed error message when `path` is not defined
* Add a test case, invalid rack app is passed
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When `require 'active_support/rails'`, 'active_support/deprecation'
is automatically loaded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When an application has multiple root entries with different
constraints, the current solution is to use `get '/'`. Example:
**Currently I have to do:**
```ruby
get '/', to: 'portfolio#show', constraints: ->(req) { Hostname.portfolio_site?(req.host) }
get '/', to: 'blog#show', constraints: ->(req) { Hostname.blog_site?(req.host) }
root 'landing#show'
```
**But I would like to do:**
```ruby
root 'portfolio#show', constraints: ->(req) { Hostname.portfolio_site?(req.host) }
root 'blog#show', constraints: ->(req) { Hostname.blog_site?(req.host) }
root 'landing#show'
```
Other URL matchers such as `get`, `post`, etc, already allows this, so I
think it's fair that `root` also allow it since it's just a shortcut for
a `get` internally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When generating the url for a mounted engine through its proxy, the path should be the sum of three parts:
1. Any `SCRIPT_NAME` request header or the value of `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#relative_url_root`.
2. A prefix (the engine's mounted path).
3. The path of the named route inside the engine.
Since commit https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/44ff0313c121f528a68b3bd21d6c7a96f313e3d3, this has been broken. Step 2 has been changed to:
2. A prefix (the value of `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#relative_url_root` + the engine's mounted path).
The value of `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#relative_url_root` is taken into account in step 1 of the route generation and should be ignored when generating the mounted engine's prefix in step 2.
This commit fixes the regression by having `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#url_for` check `options[:relative_url_root]` before falling back to `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#relative_url_root`. The prefix generating code then sets `options[:relative_url_root]` to an empty string. This empty string is used instead of `ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet#relative_url_root` and avoids the duplicate `relative_url_root` value in the final result.
This resolves #20920 and resolves #21459
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
controllers should always go through the `action` class method so that
their middleware is respected.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the dispatcher class isn't configurable anymore, so pull up allocation
to the method that needs it.
|
|
|
|
| |
This way we can make the Route object a read-only data structure.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We shouldn't be messing with the NamedRouteCollection internals. Just
ask the object if the named route is in there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
```ruby
require 'action_pack'
require 'action_dispatch'
require 'benchmark/ips'
route_set = ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet.new
routes = ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper.new route_set
ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.setup(%i{path line type})
result = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.trace do
500.times do
routes.resources :foo
end
end
sorted = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.allocated_count_table.sort_by(&:last)
sorted.each do |k,v|
next if v == 0
p k => v
end
__END__
Before:
{:T_SYMBOL=>11}
{:T_REGEXP=>17}
{:T_STRUCT=>6500}
{:T_MATCH=>12004}
{:T_OBJECT=>99009}
{:T_DATA=>100088}
{:T_HASH=>122015}
{:T_STRING=>159637}
{:T_IMEMO=>363134}
{:T_ARRAY=>433056}
After:
{:T_SYMBOL=>11}
{:T_REGEXP=>17}
{:T_STRUCT=>6500}
{:T_MATCH=>12004}
{:T_OBJECT=>91009}
{:T_DATA=>100088}
{:T_HASH=>114013}
{:T_STRING=>159637}
{:T_ARRAY=>321056}
{:T_IMEMO=>351133}
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather than building a regexp for every route, lets use the strategy
pattern to select among objects that can match HTTP verbs. This commit
introduces strategy objects for each verb that has a predicate method on
the request object like `get?`, `post?`, etc.
When we build the route object, look up the strategy for the verbs the
user specified. If we can't find it, fall back on string matching.
Using a strategy / null object pattern (the `All` VerbMatcher is our
"null" object in this case) we can:
1) Remove conditionals
2) Drop boot time allocations
2) Drop run time allocations
3) Improve runtime performance
Here is our boot time allocation benchmark:
```ruby
require 'action_pack'
require 'action_dispatch'
route_set = ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet.new
routes = ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper.new route_set
result = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.trace do
500.times do
routes.resources :foo
end
end
sorted = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.allocated_count_table.sort_by(&:last)
sorted.each do |k,v|
next if v == 0
p k => v
end
__END__
Before:
$ be ruby -rallocation_tracer route_test.rb
{:T_SYMBOL=>11}
{:T_REGEXP=>4017}
{:T_STRUCT=>6500}
{:T_MATCH=>12004}
{:T_DATA=>84092}
{:T_OBJECT=>99009}
{:T_HASH=>122015}
{:T_STRING=>216652}
{:T_IMEMO=>355137}
{:T_ARRAY=>441057}
After:
$ be ruby -rallocation_tracer route_test.rb
{:T_SYMBOL=>11}
{:T_REGEXP=>17}
{:T_STRUCT=>6500}
{:T_MATCH=>12004}
{:T_DATA=>84092}
{:T_OBJECT=>99009}
{:T_HASH=>122015}
{:T_STRING=>172647}
{:T_IMEMO=>355136}
{:T_ARRAY=>433056}
```
This benchmark adds 500 resources. Each resource has 8 routes, so it
adds 4000 routes. You can see from the results that this patch
eliminates 4000 Regexp allocations, ~44000 String allocations, and ~8000
Array allocations. With that, we can figure out that the previous code
would allocate 1 regexp, 11 strings, and 2 arrays per route *more* than
this patch in order to handle verb matching.
Next lets look at runtime allocations:
```ruby
require 'action_pack'
require 'action_dispatch'
require 'benchmark/ips'
route_set = ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet.new
routes = ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper.new route_set
routes.resources :foo
route = route_set.routes.first
request = ActionDispatch::Request.new("REQUEST_METHOD" => "GET")
result = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.trace do
500.times do
route.matches? request
end
end
sorted = ObjectSpace::AllocationTracer.allocated_count_table.sort_by(&:last)
sorted.each do |k,v|
next if v == 0
p k => v
end
__END__
Before:
$ be ruby -rallocation_tracer route_test.rb
{:T_MATCH=>500}
{:T_STRING=>501}
{:T_IMEMO=>1501}
After:
$ be ruby -rallocation_tracer route_test.rb
{:T_IMEMO=>1001}
```
This benchmark runs 500 calls against the `matches?` method on the route
object. We check this method in the case that there are two methods
that match the same path, but they are differentiated by the verb (or
other conditionals). For example `POST /users` vs `GET /users`, same
path, different action.
Previously, we were using regexps to match against the verb. You can
see that doing the regexp match would allocate 1 match object and 1
string object each time it was called. This patch eliminates those
allocations.
Next lets look at runtime performance.
```ruby
require 'action_pack'
require 'action_dispatch'
require 'benchmark/ips'
route_set = ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet.new
routes = ActionDispatch::Routing::Mapper.new route_set
routes.resources :foo
route = route_set.routes.first
match = ActionDispatch::Request.new("REQUEST_METHOD" => "GET")
no_match = ActionDispatch::Request.new("REQUEST_METHOD" => "POST")
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.report("match") do
route.matches? match
end
x.report("no match") do
route.matches? no_match
end
end
__END__
Before:
$ be ruby -rallocation_tracer runtime.rb
Calculating -------------------------------------
match 17.145k i/100ms
no match 24.244k i/100ms
-------------------------------------------------
match 259.708k (± 4.3%) i/s - 1.303M
no match 453.376k (± 5.9%) i/s - 2.279M
After:
$ be ruby -rallocation_tracer runtime.rb
Calculating -------------------------------------
match 23.958k i/100ms
no match 29.402k i/100ms
-------------------------------------------------
match 465.063k (± 3.8%) i/s - 2.324M
no match 691.956k (± 4.5%) i/s - 3.469M
```
This tests tries to see how many times it can match a request per
second. Switching to method calls and string comparison makes the
successful match case about 79% faster, and the unsuccessful case about
52% faster.
That was fun!
|