| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
AC::Parameters does not inherit from HashWithIndifferentAccess
since #20868 by @sikachu
|
|
|
|
|
| |
everything above metal really doesn't care about setting the content
type, so lets rearrange these methods to be in metal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
_set_content_type only does something when there is a request object,
otherwise the return value of _get_content_type is always ignored. This
commit moves everything to the module that has access to the request
object so we'll never to_s unless there is a reason
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in the future I would like to make the header hash read only (or at
least remove guarantees that mutations will do anything).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Just include the modules necessary in the Request object to implement
the things we need. This should make it easier to build delegate
request objects because the API is smaller
|
|
|
|
| |
action_controller_overview file Rails' -> Rails" [ci skip]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With changes made in 8363b8 and ae29142 cookies that are mutated on the
request like `cookies.signed = x` were not retained in subsequent tests,
breaking cookie authentiation in controller tests.
The test added demonstrates the issue.
The reason we need to select from non-deleted cookies is because without
checking the `@delete_cookies` the `cookie_jar` `@cookies` will send the
wrong cookies to be updated. The code must check for `@deleted_cookies`
before sending an `#update` with the requests cookie_jar cookies.
This follows how the cookie_jar cookies from the request were updated
before these changes.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Remove dead code
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
References #19565.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* A string in the example lacked quotes.
* The tests asserted stuff about :last_name, whereas
test params do not have that key.
* But, the first one passed, why? After hitting my head against
the wall and doing some obscure rituals realized the new
#require had an important typo, wanted to iterate over the
array argument (key), but it ran over its own hash keys
(method #keys).
* Modified the test to prevent the same typo to happen again.
* The second test assigned to an unused variable safe_params
that has been therefore removed.
* Grammar of the second test description.
* Since I was on it, reworded both test descriptions.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This PR adds ability to accept arrays which allows you to require multiple values in one method. so instead of this:
```ruby
params.require(:person).require(:first_name)
params.require(:person).require(:last_name)
```
Here it will be one line for each params, so say if I require 10params, it will be 10lines of repeated code which is not dry. So I have added new method which does this in one line:
```ruby
params.require(:person).require([:first_name, :last_name])
```
Comments welcome
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit cae2b5bb59212961c4a35c939381ebece48d1177.
I am an idiot.
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
jeremyf/updating-ActionController-TestSession-to-behave-as-a-hash-with-indifferent
Updating TestSession to access with indifference
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The following Rails code failed (with a `KeyError` exception) under
test:
```ruby
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
def user_strategy
# At this point:
# ```ruby
# session == {
# "user_strategy"=>"email",
# "user_identifying_value"=>"hello@world.com"
# }
# ```
if session.key?(:user_strategy)
session.fetch(:user_strategy)
end
end
end
```
When I checked the session's keys (`session.keys`), I got an array of
strings. If I accessed `session[:user_strategy]` I got the expected
`'email'` value. However if I used `session.fetch(:user_strategy)` I
got a `KeyError` exception.
This appears to be a Rails 4.2.4 regression (as the code works under
Rails 4.2.3).
Closes #21383
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Apparently the AbstractController (whatever "abstract" means) is
expected to work without a request and response.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
`render` is the only possible source for the `plain` option. Pulling
the conditional up to the `render` method removes far away conditionals
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
We don't need to pass the full hash just to pull one value out. It's
better to just pass the value that the method needs to know about so
that we can abstract it away from "options"
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Since all controller instances are required to have a request and
response object, RackDelegation is no longer needed (we always have to
delegate to the response)
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
the subclass sets the body on the response object, so we don't need the
superclass doing it too
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
without this module, the content type is not set correctly
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Now that `Controller#status=` just delegates to the response object,
we don't need to set the response on the controller and the response.
We can just set it in one place.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
we always have a response object, so there is no reason to test it
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
these ivars don't exist anymore, so we can remove them from the list
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
since the controller always has a request on it, we can just ask the
request for the content type.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The controller instance always has an instance of a response object. We
should store the status code on the response object so that it's only
store in one place.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
We always have a response object in controller instances, so we can
remove this conditional
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| | |
controller instances always have a response object, so we don't need to
test to see if there is one, just always call to_a on the response.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Controllers should always have a request and response when responding.
Since we make this The Rule(tm), then controllers don't need to be
somewhere in limbo between "asking a response object for a rack
response" or "I, myself contain a rack response". This duality leads to
conditionals spread through the codebase that we can delete:
* https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/85a78d9358aa728298cd020cdc842b55c16f9549/actionpack/lib/action_controller/metal.rb#L221-L223
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
we don't need an instance to figure out what type of response to
allocate. Later we'll pull this up the stack and pass the response
object down
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This saves a lambda and request allocation on each request.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
controllers should always go through the `action` class method so that
their middleware is respected.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
superclass already has this method, so remove this one
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Remove unused block arguments
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
| |
May be missed in 5fe141638f1243ac6ae187ae14aa398b4c1875a2 commit
Also fixes the broken build
|