| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
their own header object
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When you mount your application at a path, for example /myapp, server
should set SCRIPT_NAME to /myapp. With such information, rails
application knows that it's mounted at /myapp path and it should generate
routes relative to that path.
Before this patch, rails handled SCRIPT_NAME correctly only for regular
apps, but it failed to do it for mounted engines. The solution was to
hardcode default_url_options[:script_name], which is not the best answer
- it will work only when application is mounted at a fixed path.
This patch fixes the situation by respecting original value of
SCRIPT_NAME when generating application's routes from engine and the
other way round - when you generate engine's routes from application.
This is done by using one of 2 pieces of information in env - current
SCRIPT_NAME or SCRIPT_NAME for a corresponding router. This is because
we have 2 cases to handle:
- generating engine's route from application: in this situation
SCRIPT_NAME is basically SCRIPT_NAME set by the server and it
indicates the place where application is mounted, so we can just pass
it as :original_script_name in url_options. :original_script_name is
used because if we use :script_name, router will ignore generating
prefix for engine
- generating application's route from engine: in this situation we
already lost information about the SCRIPT_NAME that server used. For
example if application is mounted at /myapp and engine is mounted at
/blog, at this point SCRIPT_NAME is equal /myapp/blog. Because of that
we need to keep reference to /myapp SCRIPT_NAME by binding it to the
current router. Later on we can extract it and use when generating url
Please note that starting from now you *should not* use
default_url_options[:script_name] explicitly if your server already
passes correct SCRIPT_NAME to rack env.
(closes #6933)
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
by Active Support)
Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails
made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base.
After some discussion in
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d
we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough
for this particular idiom.
In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes
include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the
way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case
statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked
the most in each case.
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
activemodel/lib/active_model/secure_password.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/associations/collection_proxy.rb
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
HTTP Token authentication in integration tests
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
single check.
Rails includes a single character body to a head(:no_content) response to work around an old Safari bug where headers were ignored if no body sent.
This patch brings the behavior slightly closer to spec if :no_content/204 is explicity requested via a head only response.
Status comparison done on symbolic and numeric values
Not returning any content when responding with head and limited to a status code that explicitly states no content will be returned - 100..199, 204, 205, 304.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
Fix for digest authentication bug - issue #2301 in rails/rails
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ / |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
Follow code conventions in metal/live
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ / |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
will work
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
responses.
Processing controller actions in a separate thread allows us to work
around the rack api - we can allow the user to set status and headers,
then block until the first bytes are written. As soon as the first
bytes are written, the main thread can return the status, headers, and
(essentially) a queue for the body.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
| |
Conflicts:
actionpack/lib/action_controller/metal/http_authentication.rb
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
- #respond_to's documentation refer to .respond_to, but it was
written as just <respond_to>. Added class name for clarification.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When someone sends malformed authorization header, like:
Authorization: Token foobar
given token should be just ignored and resource should not be authorized,
instead of raising error. Before this patch controller would return 401 header
only for well formed tokens, like:
Authorization: Token token=foobar
and would return 500 in former case.
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
merging cookies is responsibility of the test runner
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
For some reason, this special logic is only supposed to be executed on
the second request. For now, we'll extend on recycle, but we should
figure out why this functionality can't be run on every request
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Try to avoid making the controller mutate itself so that we can
eventually make the response async
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
