| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* Allow to specify a type for foreign key column in migrations
* unified the docs
* some cleanup in CHANGELOG
|
|/
|
|
| |
[Andrey Novikov & Łukasz Sarnacki]
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
zuhao/refactor_activerecord_nested_through_associations_test
Make sure assertion passes for postgresql.
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| | |
zuhao/refactor_activerecord_attribute_decorators_test
Remove redundant reset that already happened in teardown.
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The fixtures are still in play, adding a new column without a default and `null: true`
is not possible. This reverts back to leaking global state, as our `schema.rb` adds
the `null: false` constraint on this field.
A future solution would be to make the `migration_test.rb` run independent of fixture tables.
This way we can simply drop the state after test execution, without worrying about side effects.
/cc @zuhao
|
|\
| |
| | |
Remove length limit that results failure in other tests.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
[ci skip]
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| | |
zuhao/refactor_activerecord_presence_validation_test
Remove the side-effects of validates_presence_of.
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Added some missing activesupport test coverage
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Remove not-required file class/subclasses
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Touch option description grammatical error fixed [ci skip]
|
|/ / / |
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| | |
Generators guide grammatical error fixed [ci skip]
|
|/ / |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
[ci skip] Fix code in Routing Guide
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
actionpack/test/abstract_unit.rb
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We are planning to remove mocha from our test suite because of
performance problems. To make this possible we should stop require mocha
on ActionSupport::TestCase.
This should not affect applications since users still need to add mocha
to Gemfile and this already load mocha.
Added FIXME notes to place that still need mocha removal
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Missing test for form values before type cast
|
|/ / |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Some ActionView renderer refactors
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Fixed typo in comment [ci skip]
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| |_|/ /
|/| | | |
Make create_join_table use the same logic as HABTM reflections
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Before this change, create_join_table would not remove the common prefix
in the join table name, unlike ActiveRecord::Reflections. A HABTM
between Music::Artist and Music::Record would use a table
music_artists_records, while create_join table would create
music_artists_music_records.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fixes to request method test.
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Since we're stubbing the request, the test is actually just asserting
that `@method = env['REQUEST_METHOD']`. In order to the test against
the methodoverride middleware, we should test it against an actual
request. However, Rack is already covering this scenario so we can
remove this test.
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
There is already another test covering Request#request_method. This
test should cover Request#method.
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |_|/
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The current test is asserting against an outdated version of
Request#method where HEAD requests are treated as GET requests.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
aantix/additional_migration_conflict_help_messaging
Additional help messaging to help the user resolve a conflicted migration
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
a migration already exists for the resource.
The user is now alerted that they are able to skip the conflicted migration file via the --skip option.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ /
|/| | | | |
Cleanup + CHANGELOG for pr #14886
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Also cleanup test a bit
[related #14886]
[related #14743]
|
|/ / / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The entire 127.0.0.0/8 range is assigned to the loopback address, not
only 127.0.0.0/24. This patch allows ActionDispatch::Request::LOCALHOST
to match any IPv4 127.0.0.0/8 loopback address.
The only place that the #local? method was previously under test was
in the show_expectations_test.rb file. I don't particularly like that
that's implicitly where this code is under test, and I feel like I
should move some of that testing code into the
test/dispatch/request_test.rb file, but I wanted some feedback first.
Credit goes to @sriedel for discovering the issue and adding the
patch.
|