diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'railties/lib/rails/engine.rb')
| -rw-r--r-- | railties/lib/rails/engine.rb | 188 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 90 deletions
diff --git a/railties/lib/rails/engine.rb b/railties/lib/rails/engine.rb index 1d81e08cd3..6e5e842370 100644 --- a/railties/lib/rails/engine.rb +++ b/railties/lib/rails/engine.rb @@ -5,19 +5,20 @@ require 'rbconfig' require 'rails/engine/railties' module Rails - # Rails::Engine allows you to wrap a specific Rails application and share it accross - # different applications. Since Rails 3.0, every Rails::Application is nothing - # more than an Engine, allowing you to share it very easily. + # Rails::Engine allows you to wrap a specific Rails application and share it across + # different applications. Since Rails 3.0, every <tt>Rails::Application</tt> is nothing + # more than an engine, allowing you to share it very easily. # - # Any Rails::Engine is also a Rails::Railtie, so the same methods (like rake_tasks and - # generators) and configuration available in the latter can also be used in the former. + # Any <tt>Rails::Engine</tt> is also a <tt>Rails::Railtie</tt>, so the same methods + # (like <tt>rake_tasks</tt> and +generators+) and configuration available in the + # latter can also be used in the former. # # == Creating an Engine # - # In Rails versions before to 3.0, your gems automatically behaved as Engine, however + # In Rails versions prior to 3.0, your gems automatically behaved as engines, however, # this coupled Rails to Rubygems. Since Rails 3.0, if you want a gem to automatically - # behave as Engine, you have to specify an Engine for it somewhere inside your plugin - # lib folder (similar to how we specify a Railtie): + # behave as an engine, you have to specify an +Engine+ for it somewhere inside + # your plugin's +lib+ folder (similar to how we specify a +Railtie+): # # # lib/my_engine.rb # module MyEngine @@ -25,16 +26,17 @@ module Rails # end # end # - # Then ensure that this file is loaded at the top of your config/application.rb (or in - # your Gemfile) and it will automatically load models, controllers and helpers - # inside app, load routes at "config/routes.rb", load locales at "config/locales/*", - # load tasks at "lib/tasks/*". + # Then ensure that this file is loaded at the top of your <tt>config/application.rb</tt> + # (or in your +Gemfile+) and it will automatically load models, controllers and helpers + # inside +app+, load routes at <tt>config/routes.rb</tt>, load locales at + # <tt>config/locales/*</tt>, and load tasks at <tt>lib/tasks/*</tt>. # # == Configuration # - # Besides the Railtie configuration which is shared across the application, in a - # Rails::Engine you can access autoload_paths, eager_load_paths and autoload_once_paths, - # which differently from a Railtie, are scoped to the current Engine. + # Besides the +Railtie+ configuration which is shared across the application, in a + # <tt>Rails::Engine</tt> you can access <tt>autoload_paths</tt>, <tt>eager_load_paths</tt> + # and <tt>autoload_once_paths</tt>, which, differently from a <tt>Railtie</tt>, are scoped to + # the current engine. # # Example: # @@ -49,7 +51,7 @@ module Rails # # == Generators # - # You can set up generators for engine with config.generators method: + # You can set up generators for engines with <tt>config.generators</tt> method: # # class MyEngine < Rails::Engine # config.generators do |g| @@ -59,7 +61,7 @@ module Rails # end # end # - # You can also set generators for application by using config.app_generators: + # You can also set generators for an application by using <tt>config.app_generators</tt>: # # class MyEngine < Rails::Engine # # note that you can also pass block to app_generators in the same way you @@ -69,25 +71,25 @@ module Rails # # == Paths # - # Since Rails 3.0, both your Application and Engines do not have hardcoded paths. - # This means that you are not required to place your controllers at "app/controllers", + # Since Rails 3.0, both your application and engines do not have hardcoded paths. + # This means that you are not required to place your controllers at <tt>app/controllers</tt>, # but in any place which you find convenient. # - # For example, let's suppose you want to lay your controllers at lib/controllers, all - # you need to do is: + # For example, let's suppose you want to place your controllers in <tt>lib/controllers</tt>. + # All you would need to do is: # # class MyEngine < Rails::Engine # paths["app/controllers"] = "lib/controllers" # end # - # You can also have your controllers being loaded from both "app/controllers" and - # "lib/controllers": + # You can also have your controllers loaded from both <tt>app/controllers</tt> and + # <tt>lib/controllers</tt>: # # class MyEngine < Rails::Engine # paths["app/controllers"] << "lib/controllers" # end # - # The available paths in an Engine are: + # The available paths in an engine are: # # class MyEngine < Rails::Engine # paths["app"] #=> ["app"] @@ -103,16 +105,17 @@ module Rails # paths["config/routes"] #=> ["config/routes.rb"] # end # - # Your Application class adds a couple more paths to this set. And as in your Application, - # all folders under "app" are automatically added to the load path. So if you have - # "app/observers", it's added by default. + # Your <tt>Application</tt> class adds a couple more paths to this set. And as in your + # <tt>Application</tt>,all folders under +app+ are automatically added to the load path. + # So if you have <tt>app/observers</tt>, it's added by default. # # == Endpoint # - # Engine can be also a rack application. It can be useful if you have a rack application that - # you would like to wrap with Engine and provide some of the Engine's features. + # An engine can be also a rack application. It can be useful if you have a rack application that + # you would like to wrap with +Engine+ and provide some of the +Engine+'s features. + # + # To do that, use the +endpoint+ method: # - # To do that, use endpoint method: # module MyEngine # class Engine < Rails::Engine # endpoint MyRackApplication @@ -121,14 +124,14 @@ module Rails # # Now you can mount your engine in application's routes just like that: # - # MyRailsApp::Application.routes.draw do - # mount MyEngine::Engine => "/engine" - # end + # MyRailsApp::Application.routes.draw do + # mount MyEngine::Engine => "/engine" + # end # # == Middleware stack # - # As Engine can now be rack endpoint, it can also have a middleware stack. The usage is exactly - # the same as in application: + # As an engine can now be rack endpoint, it can also have a middleware stack. The usage is exactly + # the same as in <tt>Application</tt>: # # module MyEngine # class Engine < Rails::Engine @@ -138,8 +141,8 @@ module Rails # # == Routes # - # If you don't specify endpoint, routes will be used as default endpoint. You can use them - # just like you use application's routes: + # If you don't specify an endpoint, routes will be used as the default endpoint. You can use them + # just like you use an application's routes: # # # ENGINE/config/routes.rb # MyEngine::Engine.routes.draw do @@ -148,30 +151,31 @@ module Rails # # == Mount priority # - # Note that now there can be more than one router in you application and it's better to avoid - # passing requests through many routers. Consider such situation: + # Note that now there can be more than one router in your application, and it's better to avoid + # passing requests through many routers. Consider this situation: # # MyRailsApp::Application.routes.draw do # mount MyEngine::Engine => "/blog" # match "/blog/omg" => "main#omg" # end # - # MyEngine is mounted at "/blog" path and additionaly "/blog/omg" points application's controller. - # In such situation request to "/blog/omg" will go through MyEngine and if there is no such route - # in Engine's routes, it will be dispatched to "main#omg". It's much better to swap that: + # +MyEngine+ is mounted at <tt>/blog</tt>, and <tt>/blog/omg</tt> points to application's + # controller. In such a situation, requests to <tt>/blog/omg</tt> will go through +MyEngine+, + # and if there is no such route in +Engine+'s routes, it will be dispatched to <tt>main#omg</tt>. + # It's much better to swap that: # # MyRailsApp::Application.routes.draw do # match "/blog/omg" => "main#omg" # mount MyEngine::Engine => "/blog" # end # - # Now, Engine will get only requests that were not handled by application. + # Now, +Engine+ will get only requests that were not handled by +Application+. # # == Asset path # - # When you use engine with its own public directory, you will probably want to copy or symlink it - # to application's public directory. To simplify generating paths for assets, you can set asset_path - # for an Engine: + # When you use +Engine+ with its own public directory, you will probably want to copy or symlink it + # to application's public directory. To simplify generating paths for assets, you can set <tt>asset_path</tt> + # for an engine: # # module MyEngine # class Engine < Rails::Engine @@ -179,27 +183,30 @@ module Rails # end # end # - # With such config, asset paths will be automatically modified inside Engine: - # image_path("foo.jpg") #=> "/my_engine/images/foo.jpg" + # With such a config, asset paths will be automatically modified inside +Engine+: + # + # image_path("foo.jpg") #=> "/my_engine/images/foo.jpg" # # == Serving static files # - # By default, rails use ActionDispatch::Static to serve static files in development mode. This is ok - # while you develop your application, but when you want to deploy it, assets from engine will not be + # By default, Rails uses <tt>ActionDispatch::Static</tt> to serve static files in development mode. This is ok + # while you develop your application, but when you want to deploy it, assets from an engine will not be # served by default. You should choose one of the two following strategies: # # * enable serving static files by setting config.serve_static_assets to true - # * copy engine's public files to application's public folder with rake ENGINE_NAME:install:assets, for example - # rake my_engine:install:assets + # * copy engine's public files to application's public folder with <tt>rake ENGINE_NAME:install:assets</tt>, for example + # <tt>rake my_engine:install:assets</tt> # # == Engine name # - # There are some places where engine's name is used: - # * routes: when you mount engine with mount(MyEngine::Engine => '/my_engine'), it's used as default :as option - # * some of the rake tasks are based on engine name, e.g. my_engine:install:migrations, my_engine:install:assets + # There are some places where an Engine's name is used: + # * routes: when you mount an Engine with <tt>mount(MyEngine::Engine => '/my_engine')</tt>, + # it's used as default :as option + # * some of the rake tasks are based on engine name, e.g. <tt>my_engine:install:migrations</tt>, + # <tt>my_engine:install:assets</tt> # - # Engine name is set by default based on class name. For MyEngine::Engine it will be my_engine_engine. - # You can change it manually it manually using engine_name method: + # Engine name is set by default based on class name. For <tt>MyEngine::Engine</tt> it will be + # <tt>my_engine_engine</tt>. You can change it manually it manually using the <tt>engine_name</tt> method: # # module MyEngine # class Engine < Rails::Engine @@ -209,12 +216,12 @@ module Rails # # == Isolated Engine # - # Normally when you create controllers, helpers and models inside engine, they are treated - # as they were created inside the application. This means all applications helpers and named routes - # will be available to your engine controllers. + # Normally when you create controllers, helpers and models inside an engine, they are treated + # as they were created inside the application. This means all application helpers and named routes + # will be available to your engine's controllers. # - # However, sometimes you want to isolate your engine from the application, specially if your engine - # have its own router. To do that, you simply need to call +isolate_namespace+. This method requires + # However, sometimes you want to isolate your engine from the application, especially if your engine + # has its own router. To do that, you simply need to call +isolate_namespace+. This method requires # you to pass a module where all your controllers, helpers and models should be nested to: # # module MyEngine @@ -223,7 +230,8 @@ module Rails # end # end # - # With such Engine, everything that is inside MyEngine module, will be isolated from application. + # With such an engine, everything that is inside the +MyEngine+ module will be isolated from + # the application. # # Consider such controller: # @@ -232,24 +240,24 @@ module Rails # end # end # - # If engine is marked as isolated, FooController has access only to helpers from engine and - # url_helpers from MyEngine::Engine.routes. + # If an engine is marked as isolated, +FooController+ has access only to helpers from +Engine+ and + # <tt>url_helpers</tt> from <tt>MyEngine::Engine.routes</tt>. # - # The next thing that changes in isolated engine is routes behaviour. Normally, when you namespace - # your controllers, you also need to do namespace all your routes. With isolated engine, + # The next thing that changes in isolated engines is the behaviour of routes. Normally, when you namespace + # your controllers, you also need to do namespace all your routes. With an isolated engine, # the namespace is applied by default, so you can ignore it in routes: # # MyEngine::Engine.routes.draw do # resources :articles # end - # - # The routes above will automatically point to MyEngine::ApplicationContoller. Further more, you don't - # need to use longer url helpers like "my_engine_articles_path". Instead, you shuold simply use - # articles_path as you would do with your application. - # - # To make that behaviour consistent with other parts of framework, isolated engine has influence also on - # ActiveModel::Naming. When you use namespaced model, like MyEngine::Article, it will normally - # use the prefix "my_engine". In isolated engine, the prefix will be ommited in url helpers and + # + # The routes above will automatically point to <tt>MyEngine::ApplicationContoller</tt>. Furthermore, you don't + # need to use longer url helpers like <tt>my_engine_articles_path</tt>. Instead, you shuold simply use + # <tt>articles_path</tt> as you would do with your application. + # + # To make that behaviour consistent with other parts of the framework, an isolated engine also has influence on + # <tt>ActiveModel::Naming</tt>. When you use a namespaced model, like <tt>MyEngine::Article</tt>, it will normally + # use the prefix "my_engine". In an isolated engine, the prefix will be ommited in url helpers and # form fields for convenience. # # polymorphic_url(MyEngine::Article.new) #=> "articles_path" @@ -264,9 +272,9 @@ module Rails # # == Using Engine's routes outside Engine # - # Since now you can mount engine inside application's routes, you do not have direct access to engine's - # url_helpers inside application. When you mount Engine in application's routes, a special helper is - # created to allow you to do that. Consider such scenario: + # Since you can now mount an engine inside application's routes, you do not have direct access to +Engine+'s + # <tt>url_helpers</tt> inside +Application+. When you mount an engine in an application's routes, a special helper is + # created to allow you to do that. Consider such a scenario: # # # APP/config/routes.rb # MyApplication::Application.routes.draw do @@ -274,7 +282,7 @@ module Rails # match "/foo" => "foo#index" # end # - # Now, you can use my_engine helper inside your application: + # Now, you can use the <tt>my_engine</tt> helper inside your application: # # class FooController < ApplicationController # def index @@ -282,7 +290,7 @@ module Rails # end # end # - # There is also 'main_app' helper that gives you access to application's routes inside Engine: + # There is also a <tt>main_app</tt> helper that gives you access to application's routes inside Engine: # # module MyEngine # class BarController @@ -292,34 +300,34 @@ module Rails # end # end # - # Note that the :as option given to mount takes the engine_name as default, so most of the time - # you can simply ommit it. + # Note that the <tt>:as</tt> option given to mount takes the <tt>engine_name</tT> as default, so most of the time + # you can simply omit it. # - # Finally, if you want to generate url to engine's route using polymorphic_url, you also need + # Finally, if you want to generate a url to an engine's route using <tt>polymorphic_url</tt>, you also need # to pass the engine helper. Let's say that you want to create a form pointing to one of the # engine's routes. All you need to do is pass the helper as the first element in array with # attributes for url: # - # form_for([my_engine, @user]) + # form_for([my_engine, @user]) # - # This code will use my_engine.user_path(@user) to generate the proper route. + # This code will use <tt>my_engine.user_path(@user)</tt> to generate the proper route. # # == Migrations & seed data # - # Engines can have their own migrations. Default path for migrations is exactly the same - # as in application: db/migrate + # Engines can have their own migrations. The default path for migrations is exactly the same + # as in application: <tt>db/migrate</tt> # # To use engine's migrations in application you can use rake task, which copies them to # application's dir: # # rake ENGINE_NAME:install:migrations # - # Note that some of the migrations may be skipped if migration with the same name already exists - # in application. In such situation you must decide whether to leave that migration or rename the + # Note that some of the migrations may be skipped if a migration with the same name already exists + # in application. In such a situation you must decide whether to leave that migration or rename the # migration in application and rerun copying migrations. # # If your engine has migrations, you may also want to prepare data for the database in - # seeds.rb file. You can load that data using load_seed method, e.g. + # the <tt>seeds.rb</tt> file. You can load that data using the <tt>load_seed</tt> method, e.g. # # MyEngine::Engine.load_seed # |