diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'railties/guides/source/ajax_on_rails.textile')
| -rw-r--r-- | railties/guides/source/ajax_on_rails.textile | 58 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/railties/guides/source/ajax_on_rails.textile b/railties/guides/source/ajax_on_rails.textile index 8a38cf2dc2..b80df4aa58 100644 --- a/railties/guides/source/ajax_on_rails.textile +++ b/railties/guides/source/ajax_on_rails.textile @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ h2. AJAX on Rails -This guide covers the built-in Ajax/Javascript functionality of Rails (and more); it will enable you to create rich and dynamic AJAX applications with ease! We will cover the following topics: +This guide covers the built-in Ajax/JavaScript functionality of Rails (and more); it will enable you to create rich and dynamic AJAX applications with ease! We will cover the following topics: * Quick introduction to AJAX and related technologies -* Handling Javascript the Rails way: Rails helpers, RJS, Prototype and script.aculo.us -* Testing Javascript functionality +* Handling JavaScript the Rails way: Rails helpers, RJS, Prototype and script.aculo.us +* Testing JavaScript functionality endprologue. @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ h3. Hello AJAX - a Quick Intro If you are a 'show me the code' type of person, you might want to skip this part and jump to the RJS section right away. However, I would really recommend to read it - you'll need the basics of DOM, http requests and other topics discussed here to really understand Ajax on Rails. -h4. Asynchronous Javascript + XML +h4. Asynchronous JavaScript + XML Basic terminology, new style of creating web apps @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ How do 'standard' and AJAX requests differ, why does this matter for understandi h3. Built-in Rails Helpers -Rails' Javascript framework of choice is "Prototype":http://www.prototypejs.org. Prototype is a generic-purpose Javascript framework that aims to ease the development of dynamic web applications by offering DOM manipulation, AJAX and other Javascript functionality ranging from utility functions to object oriented constructs. It is not specifically written for any language, so Rails provides a set of helpers to enable seamless integration of Prototype with your Rails views. +Rails' JavaScript framework of choice is "Prototype":http://www.prototypejs.org. Prototype is a generic-purpose JavaScript framework that aims to ease the development of dynamic web applications by offering DOM manipulation, AJAX and other JavaScript functionality ranging from utility functions to object oriented constructs. It is not specifically written for any language, so Rails provides a set of helpers to enable seamless integration of Prototype with your Rails views. To get access to these helpers, all you have to do is to include the prototype framework in your pages - typically in your master layout, application.html.erb - like so: <ruby> @@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ You are ready to add some AJAX love to your Rails app! h4. The Quintessential AJAX Rails Helper: link_to_remote -Let's start with the the probably most often used helper: +link_to_remote+, which has an interesting feature from the documentation point of view: the options supplied to +link_to_remote+ are shared by all other AJAX helpers, so learning the mechanics and options of +link_to_remote+ is a great help when using other helpers. +Let's start with what is probably the most often used helper: +link_to_remote+. It has an interesting feature from the documentation point of view: the options supplied to +link_to_remote+ are shared by all other AJAX helpers, so learning the mechanics and options of +link_to_remote+ is a great help when using other helpers. The signature of +link_to_remote+ function is the same as that of the standard +link_to+ helper: <ruby> -def link_to_remote(name, options = {}, html_options = nil) +def link_to_remote(name, options = {}, html_options = nil) </ruby> And here is a simple example of link_to_remote in action: @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ link_to_remote "Delete the item", Note that if we wouldn't override the default behavior (POST), the above snippet would route to the create action rather than destroy. ** *JavaScript filters* You can customize the remote call further by wrapping it with some JavaScript code. Let's say in the previous example, when deleting a link, you'd like to ask for a confirmation by showing a simple modal text box to the user. This is a typical example what you can accomplish with these options - let's see them one by one: -*** +:confirm+ => +msg+ Pops up a JavaScript confirmation dialog, displaying +msg+. If the user chooses 'OK', the request is launched, otherwise canceled. +*** +:confirm+ => +msg+ Pops up a JavaScript confirmation dialog, displaying +msg+. If the user chooses 'OK', the request is launched, otherwise canceled. *** +:condition+ => +code+ Evaluates +code+ (which should evaluate to a boolean) and proceeds if it's true, cancels the request otherwise. *** +:before+ => +code+ Evaluates the +code+ just before launching the request. The output of the code has no influence on the execution. Typically used show a progress indicator (see this in action in the next example). *** +:after+ => +code+ Evaluates the +code+ after launching the request. Note that this is different from the +:success+ or +:complete+ callback (covered in the next section) since those are triggered after the request is completed, while the code snippet passed to +:after+ is evaluated after the remote call is made. A common example is to disable elements on the page or otherwise prevent further action while the request is completed. @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ link_to_remote "Update record", This generates a remote link which adds 2 parameters to the standard URL generated by Rails, taken from the page (contained in the elements matched by the 'status' and 'completed' DOM id). ** *Callbacks* Since an AJAX call is typically asynchronous, as it's name suggests (this is not a rule, and you can fire a synchronous request - see the last option, +:type+) your only way of communicating with a request once it is fired is via specifying callbacks. There are six options at your disposal (in fact 508, counting all possible response types, but these six are the most frequent and therefore specified by a constant): -*** +:loading:+ => +code+ The request is in the process of receiving the data, but the transfer is not completed yet. -*** +:loaded:+ => +code+ The transfer is completed, but the data is not processed and returned yet +*** +:loading:+ => +code+ The request is in the process of receiving the data, but the transfer is not completed yet. +*** +:loaded:+ => +code+ The transfer is completed, but the data is not processed and returned yet *** +:interactive:+ => +code+ One step after +:loaded+: The data is fully received and being processed *** +:success:+ => +code+ The data is fully received, parsed and the server responded with "200 OK" *** +:failure:+ => +code+ The data is fully received, parsed and the server responded with *anything* but "200 OK" (typically 404 or 500, but in general with any status code ranging from 100 to 509) @@ -136,24 +136,24 @@ link_to_remote "Add new item", :before => "$('progress').show()", :complete => "$('progress').hide()", :success => "display_item_added(request)", - :failure => "display_error(request)", + :failure => "display_error(request)" </ruby> ** *:type* If you want to fire a synchronous request for some obscure reason (blocking the browser while the request is processed and doesn't return a status code), you can use the +:type+ option with the value of +:synchronous+. * Finally, using the +html_options+ parameter you can add HTML attributes to the generated tag. It works like the same parameter of the +link_to+ helper. There are interesting side effects for the +href+ and +onclick+ parameters though: ** If you specify the +href+ parameter, the AJAX link will degrade gracefully, i.e. the link will point to the URL even if JavaScript is disabled in the client browser ** +link_to_remote+ gains it's AJAX behavior by specifying the remote call in the onclick handler of the link. If you supply +html_options[:onclick]+ you override the default behavior, so use this with care! -We are finished with +link_to_remote+. I know this is quite a lot to digest for one helper function, but remember, these options are common for all the rest of the Rails view helpers, so we will take a look at the differences / additional parameters in the next sections. +We are finished with +link_to_remote+. I know this is quite a lot to digest for one helper function, but remember, these options are common for all the rest of the Rails view helpers, so we will take a look at the differences / additional parameters in the next sections. h4. AJAX Forms There are three different ways of adding AJAX forms to your view using Rails Prototype helpers. They are slightly different, but striving for the same goal: instead of submitting the form using the standard HTTP request/response cycle, it is submitted asynchronously, thus not reloading the page. These methods are the following: * +remote_form_for+ (and it's alias +form_remote_for+) is tied to Rails most tightly of the three since it takes a resource, model or array of resources (in case of a nested resource) as a parameter. -* +form_remote_tag+ AJAXifies the form by serializing and sending it's data in the background -* +submit_to_remote+ and +button_to_remote+ is more rarely used than the previous two. Rather than creating an AJAX form, you add a button/input +* +form_remote_tag+ AJAXifies the form by serializing and sending it's data in the background +* +submit_to_remote+ and +button_to_remote+ is more rarely used than the previous two. Rather than creating an AJAX form, you add a button/input -Let's se them in action one by one! +Let's see them in action one by one! h5. +remote_form_for+ @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ h5. +form_remote_tag+ h5. +submit_to_remote+ -h4. Observing Elements +h4. Observing Elements h5. +observe_field+ @@ -183,13 +183,13 @@ h3. JavaScript the Rails way: RJS In the last section we sent some AJAX requests to the server, and inserted the HTML response into the page (with the +:update+ option). However, sometimes a more complicated interaction with the page is needed, which you can either achieve with JavaScript... or with RJS! You are sending JavaScript instructions to the server in both cases, but while in the former case you have to write vanilla JavaScript, in the second you can code Rails, and sit back while Rails generates the JavaScript for you - so basically RJS is a Ruby DSL to write JavaScript in your Rails code. -h4. Javascript without RJS +h4. JavaScript without RJS First we'll check out how to send JavaScript to the server manually. You are practically never going to need this, but it's interesting to understand what's going on under the hood. - + <ruby> def javascript_test - render :text => "alert('Hello, world!')", + render :text => "alert('Hello, world!')", :content_type => "text/javascript" end </ruby> @@ -207,14 +207,14 @@ def javascript_test render :update do |page| page.alert "Hello from inline RJS" end -end +end </ruby> -The above code snippet does exactly the same as the one in the previous section - going about it much more elegantly though. You don't need to worry about headers,write ugly JavaScript code into a string etc. When the first parameter to +render+ is +:update+, Rails expects a block with a single parameter (+page+ in our case, which is the traditional naming convention) which is an instance of the JavaScriptGenerator:"http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/PrototypeHelper/JavaScriptGenerator/GeneratorMethods.html" object. As it's name suggests, JavaScriptGenerator is responsible for generating JavaScript from your Ruby code. You can execute multiple method calls on the +page+ instance - it's all turned into JavaScript code and sent to the server with the appropriate Content Type, "text/javascript". +The above code snippet does exactly the same as the one in the previous section - going about it much more elegantly though. You don't need to worry about headers,write ugly JavaScript code into a string etc. When the first parameter to +render+ is +:update+, Rails expects a block with a single parameter (+page+ in our case, which is the traditional naming convention) which is an instance of the JavaScriptGenerator:"http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/PrototypeHelper/JavaScriptGenerator/GeneratorMethods.html" object. As it's name suggests, JavaScriptGenerator is responsible for generating JavaScript from your Ruby code. You can execute multiple method calls on the +page+ instance - it's all turned into JavaScript code and sent to the server with the appropriate Content Type, "text/javascript". h4. RJS Templates -If you don't want to clutter your controllers with view code (especially when your inline RJS is more than a few lines), you can move your RJS code to a template file. RJS templates should go to the +/app/views/+ directory, just as +.html.erb+ or any other view files of the appropriate controller, conventionally named +js.rjs+. +If you don't want to clutter your controllers with view code (especially when your inline RJS is more than a few lines), you can move your RJS code to a template file. RJS templates should go to the +/app/views/+ directory, just as +.html.erb+ or any other view files of the appropriate controller, conventionally named +js.rjs+. To rewrite the above example, you can leave the body of the action empty, and create a RJS template named +javascript_test.js.rjs+, containing the following line: @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ The third parameter can either be a string, or a hash of options to be passed to page.insert_html :top, :result, :partial => "the_answer" </ruby> -You can replace the contents (innerHTML) of an element with the +replace_html+ method. The only difference is that since it's clear where should the new content go, there is no need for a position parameter - so +replace_html+ takes only two arguments, +You can replace the contents (innerHTML) of an element with the +replace_html+ method. The only difference is that since it's clear where should the new content go, there is no need for a position parameter - so +replace_html+ takes only two arguments, the DOM id of the element you wish to modify and a string or a hash of options to be passed to ActionView::Base#render. h6. Delay @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ h6. Delay You can delay the execution of a block of code with +delay+: <ruby> -page.delay(10) { page.alert('Hey! Just waited 10 seconds') } +page.delay(10) { page.alert('Hey! Just waited 10 seconds') } </ruby> +delay+ takes one parameter (time to wait in seconds) and a block which will be executed after the specified time has passed - whatever else follows a +page.delay+ line is executed immediately, the delay affects only the code in the block. @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ h6. Reloading and Redirecting You can reload the page with the +reload+ method: <ruby> -page.reload +page.reload </ruby> When using AJAX, you can't rely on the standard +redirect_to+ controller method - you have to use the +page+'s instance method, also called +redirect_to+: @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ When using AJAX, you can't rely on the standard +redirect_to+ controller method page.redirect_to some_url </ruby> -h6. Generating Arbitrary JavaScript +h6. Generating Arbitrary JavaScript Sometimes even the full power of RJS is not enough to accomplish everything, but you still don't want to drop to pure JavaScript. A nice golden mean is offered by the combination of +<<+, +assign+ and +call+ methods: @@ -329,9 +329,9 @@ h4. Drag and Drop -h3. Testing Javascript +h3. Testing JavaScript -Javascript testing reminds me the definition of the world 'classic' by Mark Twain: "A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read." It's similar with Javascript testing: everyone would like to have it, yet it's not done by too much developers as it is tedious, complicated, there is a proliferation of tools and no consensus/accepted best practices, but we will nevertheless take a stab at it: +JavaScript testing reminds me the definition of the world 'classic' by Mark Twain: "A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read." It's similar with JavaScript testing: everyone would like to have it, yet it's not done by too much developers as it is tedious, complicated, there is a proliferation of tools and no consensus/accepted best practices, but we will nevertheless take a stab at it: * (Fire)Watir * Selenium @@ -339,4 +339,4 @@ Javascript testing reminds me the definition of the world 'classic' by Mark Twai * Cucumber+Webrat * Mention stuff like screw.unit/jsSpec -Note to self: check out the RailsConf JS testing video
\ No newline at end of file +Note to self: check out the RailsConf JS testing video |