diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md | 98 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md b/guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md index 1d14656f79..35a9617b80 100644 --- a/guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md +++ b/guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md @@ -22,6 +22,104 @@ Rails generally stays close to the latest released Ruby version when it's releas TIP: Ruby 1.8.7 p248 and p249 have marshaling bugs that crash Rails. Ruby Enterprise Edition has these fixed since the release of 1.8.7-2010.02. On the 1.9 front, Ruby 1.9.1 is not usable because it outright segfaults, so if you want to use 1.9.x, jump straight to 1.9.3 for smooth sailing. +### HTTP PATCH + +Rails 4 now uses `PATCH` as the primary HTTP verb for updates when a RESTful +resource is declared in `config/routes.rb`. The `update` action is still used, +and `PUT` requests will continue to be routed to the `update` action as well. +So, if you're using only the standard RESTful routes, no changes need to be made: + +```ruby +resources :users +``` + +```erb +<%= form_for @user do |f| %> +``` + +```ruby +class UsersController < ApplicationController + def update + # No change needed; PATCH will be preferred, and PUT will still work. + end +end +``` + +However, you will need to make a change if you are using `form_for` to update +a resource in conjunction with a custom route using the `PUT` HTTP method: + +```ruby +resources :users, do + put :update_name, on: :member +end +``` + +```erb +<%= form_for [ :update_name, @user ] do |f| %> +``` + +```ruby +class UsersController < ApplicationController + def update_name + # Change needed; form_for will try to use a non-existant PATCH route. + end +end +``` + +If the action is not being used in a public API and you are free to change the +HTTP method, you can update your route to use `patch` instead of `put`: + +`PUT` requests to `/users/:id` in Rails 4 get routed to `update` as they are +today. So, if you have an API that gets real PUT requests it is going to work. +The router also routes `PATCH` requests to `/users/:id` to the `update` action. + +```ruby +resources :users do + patch :update_name, on: :member +end +``` + +If the action is being used in a public API and you can't change to HTTP method +being used, you can update your form to use the `PUT` method instead: + +```erb +<%= form_for [ :update_name, @user ], method: :put do |f| %> +``` + +For more on PATCH and why this change was made, see [this post](http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2012/2/25/edge-rails-patch-is-the-new-primary-http-method-for-updates/) +on the Rails blog. + +#### A note about media types + +The errata for the `PATCH` verb [specifies that a 'diff' media type should be +used with `PATCH`](http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5789). One +such format is [JSON Patch](http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6902). While Rails +does not support JSON Patch natively, it's easy enough to add support: + +``` +# in your controller +def update + respond_to do |format| + format.json do + # perform a partial update + @post.update params[:post] + end + + format.json_patch do + # perform sophisticated change + end + end +end + +# In config/initializers/json_patch.rb: +Mime::Type.register 'application/json-patch+json', :json_patch +``` + +As JSON Patch was only recently made into an RFC, there aren't a lot of great +Ruby libraries yet. Aaron Patterson's +[hana](https://github.com/tenderlove/hana) is one such gem, but doesn't have +full support for the last few changes in the specification. + Upgrading from Rails 3.2 to Rails 4.0 ------------------------------------- |