aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md')
-rw-r--r--guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md113
1 files changed, 108 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md b/guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md
index 8ad2e2bdb4..5a1594102a 100644
--- a/guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md
+++ b/guides/source/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.md
@@ -22,6 +22,100 @@ Rails generally stays close to the latest released Ruby version when it's releas
TIP: Ruby 1.8.7 p248 and p249 have marshaling bugs that crash Rails. Ruby Enterprise Edition has these fixed since the release of 1.8.7-2010.02. On the 1.9 front, Ruby 1.9.1 is not usable because it outright segfaults, so if you want to use 1.9.x, jump straight to 1.9.3 for smooth sailing.
+### HTTP PATCH
+
+Rails 4 now uses `PATCH` as the primary HTTP verb for updates when a RESTful
+resource is declared in `config/routes.rb`. The `update` action is still used,
+and `PUT` requests will continue to be routed to the `update` action as well.
+So, if you're using only the standard RESTful routes, no changes need to be made:
+
+```ruby
+resources :users
+```
+
+```erb
+<%= form_for @user do |f| %>
+```
+
+```ruby
+class UsersController < ApplicationController
+ def update
+ # No change needed; PATCH will be preferred, and PUT will still work.
+ end
+end
+```
+
+However, you will need to make a change if you are using `form_for` to update
+a resource in conjunction with a custom route using the `PUT` HTTP method:
+
+```ruby
+resources :users, do
+ put :update_name, on: :member
+end
+```
+
+```erb
+<%= form_for [ :update_name, @user ] do |f| %>
+```
+
+```ruby
+class UsersController < ApplicationController
+ def update_name
+ # Change needed; form_for will try to use a non-existant PATCH route.
+ end
+end
+```
+
+If the action is not being used in a public API and you are free to change the
+HTTP method, you can update your route to use `patch` instead of `put`:
+
+```ruby
+resources :users do
+ patch :update_name, on: :member
+end
+```
+
+If the action is being used in a public API and you can't change to HTTP method
+being used, you can update your form to use the `PUT` method instead:
+
+```erb
+<%= form_for [ :update_name, @user ], method: :put do |f| %>
+```
+
+For more on PATCH and why this change was made, see [this post](http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2012/2/25/edge-rails-patch-is-the-new-primary-http-method-for-updates/)
+on the Rails blog.
+
+#### A note about media types
+
+The errata for the `PATCH` verb [specifies that a 'diff' media type should be
+used with `PATCH`](http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5789). One
+such format is [JSON Patch](http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6902). While Rails
+does not support JSON Patch natively, it's easy enough to add support:
+
+```
+# in your controller
+def update
+ respond_to do |format|
+ format.json do
+ # perform a partial update
+ @post.update params[:post]
+ end
+
+ format.json_patch do
+ # perform sophisticated change
+ end
+ end
+end
+
+# In config/initializers/json_patch.rb:
+Mime::Type.register 'application/json-patch+json', :json_patch
+```
+
+As JSON Patch was only recently made into an RFC, there aren't a lot of great
+Ruby libraries yet. Aaron Patterson's
+[hana](https://github.com/tenderlove/hana) is one such gem, but doesn't have
+full support for the last few changes in the specification.
+
Upgrading from Rails 3.2 to Rails 4.0
-------------------------------------
@@ -31,6 +125,10 @@ If your application is currently on any version of Rails older than 3.2.x, you s
The following changes are meant for upgrading your application to Rails 4.0.
+### Gemfile
+
+Rails 4.0 removed the `assets` group from Gemfile. You'd need to remove that line from your Gemfile when upgrading.
+
### vendor/plugins
Rails 4.0 no longer supports loading plugins from `vendor/plugins`. You must replace any plugins by extracting them to gems and adding them to your Gemfile. If you choose not to make them gems, you can move them into, say, `lib/my_plugin/*` and add an appropriate initializer in `config/initializers/my_plugin.rb`.
@@ -88,17 +186,22 @@ Rails 4.0 extracted Active Resource to its own gem. If you still need the featur
Please note that you should wait to set `secret_key_base` until you have 100% of your userbase on Rails 4.x and are reasonably sure you will not need to rollback to Rails 3.x. This is because cookies signed based on the new `secret_key_base` in Rails 4.x are not backwards compatible with Rails 3.x. You are free to leave your existing `secret_token` in place, not set the new `secret_key_base`, and ignore the deprecation warnings until you are reasonably sure that your upgrade is otherwise complete.
-* Rails 4.0 introduces a new `UpgradeSignatureToEncryptionCookieStore` cookie store. This is useful for upgrading apps using the old default `CookieStore` to the new default `EncryptedCookieStore` which leverages the new `ActiveSupport::KeyGenerator`. To use this transitional cookie store, you'll want to leave your existing `secret_token` in place, add a new `secret_key_base`, and change your `session_store` like so:
+If you are relying on the ability for external applications or Javascript to be able to read your Rails app's signed session cookies (or signed cookies in general) you should not set `secret_key_base` until you have decoupled these concerns.
-```ruby
- # config/initializers/session_store.rb
- Myapp::Application.config.session_store :upgrade_signature_to_encryption_cookie_store, key: 'existing session key'
+* Rails 4.0 encrypts the contents of cookie-based sessions if `secret_key_base` has been set. Rails 3.x signed, but did not encrypt, the contents of cookie-based session. Signed cookies are "secure" in that they are verified to have been generated by your app and are tamper-proof. However, the contents can be viewed by end users, and encrypting the contents eliminates this caveat/concern without a significant performance penalty.
+
+As described above, existing signed cookies generated with Rails 3.x will be transparently upgraded if you leave your existing `secret_token` in place and add the new `secret_key_base`.
+```ruby
# config/initializers/secret_token.rb
Myapp::Application.config.secret_token = 'existing secret token'
Myapp::Application.config.secret_key_base = 'new secret key base'
```
+The same caveats apply here, too. You should wait to set `secret_key_base` until you have 100% of your userbase on Rails 4.x and are reasonably sure you will not need to rollback to Rails 3.x. You should also take care to make sure you are not relying on the ability to decode signed cookies generated by your app in external applications or Javascript before upgrading.
+
+Please read [Pull Request #9978](https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/9978) for details on the move to encrypted session cookies.
+
* Rails 4.0 removed the `ActionController::Base.asset_path` option. Use the assets pipeline feature.
* Rails 4.0 has deprecated `ActionController::Base.page_cache_extension` option. Use `ActionController::Base.default_static_extension` instead.
@@ -109,7 +212,7 @@ Please note that you should wait to set `secret_key_base` until you have 100% of
* Rails 4.0 changes the default memcached client from `memcache-client` to `dalli`. To upgrade, simply add `gem 'dalli'` to your `Gemfile`.
-* Rails 4.0 deprecates the `dom_id` and `dom_class` methods. You will need to include the `ActionView::RecordIdentifier` module in controllers requiring this feature.
+* Rails 4.0 deprecates the `dom_id` and `dom_class` methods in controllers (they are fine in views). You will need to include the `ActionView::RecordIdentifier` module in controllers requiring this feature.
* Rails 4.0 changed how `assert_generates`, `assert_recognizes`, and `assert_routing` work. Now all these assertions raise `Assertion` instead of `ActionController::RoutingError`.