aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.textile
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.textile')
-rw-r--r--guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.textile61
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.textile b/guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.textile
index df475a2359..72cdea885f 100644
--- a/guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.textile
+++ b/guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.textile
@@ -343,9 +343,39 @@ h4. Commit Your Changes
When you're happy with the code on your computer, you need to commit the changes to git:
<shell>
-$ git commit -a -m "Here is a commit message on what I changed in this commit"
+$ git commit -a
</shell>
+At this point, your editor should be fired up and you can write a message for this commit. Well formatted and descriptive commit messages are extremely helpful for the others, especially when figuring out why given change was made, so please take the time to write it.
+
+Good commit message should be formatted according to the following example:
+
+<plain>
+Short summary (ideally 50 characters or less)
+
+More detailed description, if necessary. It should be wrapped to 72
+characters. Try to be as descriptive as you can, even if you think that
+the commit content is obvious, it may not be obvious to others. You
+should add such description also if it's already present in bug tracker,
+it should not be necessary to visit a webpage to check the history.
+
+Description can have multiple paragraps and you can use code examples
+inside, just indent it with 4 spaces:
+
+ class PostsController
+ def index
+ respond_with Post.limit(10)
+ end
+ end
+
+You can also add bullet points:
+
+- you can use dashes or asterisks
+
+- also, try to indent next line of a point for readability, if it's too
+ long to fit in 72 characters
+</plain>
+
TIP. Please squash your commits into a single commit when appropriate. This simplifies future cherry picks, and also keeps the git log clean.
h4. Update Master
@@ -400,6 +430,35 @@ h4. Iterate as Necessary
It’s entirely possible that the feedback you get will suggest changes. Don’t get discouraged: the whole point of contributing to an active open source project is to tap into community knowledge. If people are encouraging you to tweak your code, then it’s worth making the tweaks and resubmitting. If the feedback is that your code doesn’t belong in the core, you might still think about releasing it as a gem.
+h4. Backporting
+
+Changes that are merged into master are intended for the next major release of Rails. Sometimes, it might be beneficial for your changes to propagate back to the maintenance releases for older stable branches. Generally, security fixes and bug fixes are good candidates for a backport, while new features and patches that introduce a change in behavior will not be accepted. When in doubt, it is best to consult a rails team member before backporting your changes to avoid wasted effort.
+
+For simple fixes, the easiest way to backport your change is to "extract a diff from your changes in master and apply them to the target branch":http://ariejan.net/2009/10/26/how-to-create-and-apply-a-patch-with-git.
+
+First make sure your changes are the only difference between your current branch and master:
+
+<shell>
+$ git log master..HEAD
+</shell>
+
+Then extract the diff:
+
+<shell>
+$ git format-patch master --stdout > ~/my_changes.patch
+</shell>
+
+Switch over to the target branch and apply your changes:
+
+<shell>
+$ git checkout -b my_backport_branch 3-2-stable
+$ git apply ~/my_changes.patch
+</shell>
+
+This works well for simple changes. However, if your changes are complicated or if the code in master has deviated significantly from your target branch, it might require more work on your part. The difficulty of a backport varies greatly from case to case, and sometimes it is simply not worth the effort.
+
+Once you have resolved all conflicts and made sure all the tests are passing, push your changes and open a separate pull request for your backport. It is also worth noting that older branches might have a different set of build targets than master. When possible, it is best to first test your backport locally against the ruby versions listed in +.travis.yml+ before submitting your pull request.
+
And then ... think about your next contribution!
h3. Rails Contributors