diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'activesupport/test/core_ext')
43 files changed, 684 insertions, 654 deletions
diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/extract_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/extract_test.rb new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f26e055033 --- /dev/null +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/extract_test.rb @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +# frozen_string_literal: true + +require "abstract_unit" +require "active_support/core_ext/array" + +class ExtractTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase + def test_extract + numbers = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] + array_id = numbers.object_id + + odd_numbers = numbers.extract!(&:odd?) + + assert_equal [1, 3, 5, 7, 9], odd_numbers + assert_equal [0, 2, 4, 6, 8], numbers + assert_equal array_id, numbers.object_id + end + + def test_extract_without_block + numbers = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] + array_id = numbers.object_id + + extract_enumerator = numbers.extract! + + assert_instance_of Enumerator, extract_enumerator + assert_equal numbers.size, extract_enumerator.size + + odd_numbers = extract_enumerator.each(&:odd?) + + assert_equal [1, 3, 5, 7, 9], odd_numbers + assert_equal [0, 2, 4, 6, 8], numbers + assert_equal array_id, numbers.object_id + end + + def test_extract_on_empty_array + empty_array = [] + array_id = empty_array.object_id + + new_empty_array = empty_array.extract! { } + + assert_equal [], new_empty_array + assert_equal [], empty_array + assert_equal array_id, empty_array.object_id + end +end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/grouping_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/grouping_test.rb index c182b91826..37111a5d7d 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/grouping_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/grouping_test.rb @@ -4,15 +4,6 @@ require "abstract_unit" require "active_support/core_ext/array" class GroupingTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase - def setup - # In Ruby < 2.4, test we avoid Integer#/ (redefined by mathn) - Fixnum.send :private, :/ unless 0.class == Integer - end - - def teardown - Fixnum.send :public, :/ unless 0.class == Integer - end - def test_in_groups_of_with_perfect_fit groups = [] ("a".."i").to_a.in_groups_of(3) do |group| diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/prepend_append_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/prepend_append_test.rb index c34acd66ad..8573dbd5a6 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/prepend_append_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/array/prepend_append_test.rb @@ -1,14 +1,11 @@ # frozen_string_literal: true require "abstract_unit" -require "active_support/core_ext/array" class PrependAppendTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase - def test_append - assert_equal [1, 2], [1].append(2) - end - - def test_prepend - assert_equal [2, 1], [1].prepend(2) + def test_requiring_prepend_and_append_is_deprecated + assert_deprecated do + require "active_support/core_ext/array/prepend_and_append" + end end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/class_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/class_test.rb index 9cc006fc63..5ea288738e 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/class_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/class_test.rb @@ -30,11 +30,11 @@ class ClassTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_descendants_excludes_singleton_classes klass = Parent.new.singleton_class - refute Parent.descendants.include?(klass), "descendants should not include singleton classes" + assert_not Parent.descendants.include?(klass), "descendants should not include singleton classes" end def test_subclasses_excludes_singleton_classes klass = Parent.new.singleton_class - refute Parent.subclasses.include?(klass), "subclasses should not include singleton classes" + assert_not Parent.subclasses.include?(klass), "subclasses should not include singleton classes" end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_and_time_behavior.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_and_time_behavior.rb index 1176ed647a..b77ea22701 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_and_time_behavior.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_and_time_behavior.rb @@ -361,28 +361,40 @@ module DateAndTimeBehavior end def test_on_weekend_on_saturday - assert date_time_init(2015, 1, 3, 0, 0, 0).on_weekend? - assert date_time_init(2015, 1, 3, 15, 15, 10).on_weekend? + assert_predicate date_time_init(2015, 1, 3, 0, 0, 0), :on_weekend? + assert_predicate date_time_init(2015, 1, 3, 15, 15, 10), :on_weekend? end def test_on_weekend_on_sunday - assert date_time_init(2015, 1, 4, 0, 0, 0).on_weekend? - assert date_time_init(2015, 1, 4, 15, 15, 10).on_weekend? + assert_predicate date_time_init(2015, 1, 4, 0, 0, 0), :on_weekend? + assert_predicate date_time_init(2015, 1, 4, 15, 15, 10), :on_weekend? end def test_on_weekend_on_monday - assert_not date_time_init(2015, 1, 5, 0, 0, 0).on_weekend? - assert_not date_time_init(2015, 1, 5, 15, 15, 10).on_weekend? + assert_not_predicate date_time_init(2015, 1, 5, 0, 0, 0), :on_weekend? + assert_not_predicate date_time_init(2015, 1, 5, 15, 15, 10), :on_weekend? end def test_on_weekday_on_sunday - assert_not date_time_init(2015, 1, 4, 0, 0, 0).on_weekday? - assert_not date_time_init(2015, 1, 4, 15, 15, 10).on_weekday? + assert_not_predicate date_time_init(2015, 1, 4, 0, 0, 0), :on_weekday? + assert_not_predicate date_time_init(2015, 1, 4, 15, 15, 10), :on_weekday? end def test_on_weekday_on_monday - assert date_time_init(2015, 1, 5, 0, 0, 0).on_weekday? - assert date_time_init(2015, 1, 5, 15, 15, 10).on_weekday? + assert_predicate date_time_init(2015, 1, 5, 0, 0, 0), :on_weekday? + assert_predicate date_time_init(2015, 1, 5, 15, 15, 10), :on_weekday? + end + + def test_before + assert_equal false, date_time_init(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0).before?(date_time_init(2017, 3, 5, 12, 0, 0)) + assert_equal false, date_time_init(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0).before?(date_time_init(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0)) + assert_equal true, date_time_init(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0).before?(date_time_init(2017, 3, 7, 12, 0, 0)) + end + + def test_after + assert_equal true, date_time_init(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0).after?(date_time_init(2017, 3, 5, 12, 0, 0)) + assert_equal false, date_time_init(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0).after?(date_time_init(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0)) + assert_equal false, date_time_init(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0).after?(date_time_init(2017, 3, 7, 12, 0, 0)) end def with_bw_default(bw = :monday) diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_and_time_compatibility_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_and_time_compatibility_test.rb index 266829a452..58a24b60b6 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_and_time_compatibility_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_and_time_compatibility_test.rb @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ class DateAndTimeCompatibilityTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_string_to_time_frozen_preserves_timezone with_preserve_timezone(true) do with_env_tz "US/Eastern" do - source = "2016-04-23T15:11:12+01:00".freeze + source = "2016-04-23T15:11:12+01:00" time = source.to_time assert_instance_of Time, time @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ class DateAndTimeCompatibilityTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_string_to_time_frozen_does_not_preserve_time_zone with_preserve_timezone(false) do with_env_tz "US/Eastern" do - source = "2016-04-23T15:11:12+01:00".freeze + source = "2016-04-23T15:11:12+01:00" time = source.to_time assert_instance_of Time, time diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_ext_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_ext_test.rb index 23d17956df..b8652884ce 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_ext_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_ext_test.rb @@ -386,11 +386,11 @@ end class DateExtBehaviorTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_date_acts_like_date - assert Date.new.acts_like_date? + assert_predicate Date.new, :acts_like_date? end def test_blank? - assert_not Date.new.blank? + assert_not_predicate Date.new, :blank? end def test_freeze_doesnt_clobber_memoized_instance_methods diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_time_ext_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_time_ext_test.rb index f4c9dfcb25..f9f6b21c9b 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_time_ext_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_time_ext_test.rb @@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ class DateTimeExtCalculationsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 11, 10, 10), DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 10).since(3600) assert_equal DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 24, 10, 10, 10), DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 10).since(86400 * 2) assert_equal DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 24, 11, 10, 35), DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 10).since(86400 * 2 + 3600 + 25) - assert_equal DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 11), DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 10).since(1.333) - assert_equal DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 12), DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 10).since(1.667) + assert_not_equal DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 11), DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 10).since(1.333) + assert_not_equal DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 12), DateTime.civil(2005, 2, 22, 10, 10, 10).since(1.667) end def test_change @@ -315,15 +315,15 @@ class DateTimeExtCalculationsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_acts_like_date - assert DateTime.new.acts_like_date? + assert_predicate DateTime.new, :acts_like_date? end def test_acts_like_time - assert DateTime.new.acts_like_time? + assert_predicate DateTime.new, :acts_like_time? end def test_blank? - assert_not DateTime.new.blank? + assert_not_predicate DateTime.new, :blank? end def test_utc? @@ -363,45 +363,45 @@ class DateTimeExtCalculationsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_compare_with_time - assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59) - assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) + assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59) + assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) assert_equal(-1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1)) end def test_compare_with_datetime - assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> DateTime.civil(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59) - assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) + assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> DateTime.civil(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59) + assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) assert_equal(-1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1)) end def test_compare_with_time_with_zone - assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) + assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) + assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) assert_equal(-1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"])) end def test_compare_with_string - assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59).to_s - assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0).to_s + assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59).to_s + assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0).to_s assert_equal(-1, DateTime.civil(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1).to_s) assert_nil DateTime.civil(2000) <=> "Invalid as Time" end def test_compare_with_integer - assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(1970, 1, 1, 12, 0, 0) <=> 2440587 - assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(1970, 1, 1, 12, 0, 0) <=> 2440588 + assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(1970, 1, 1, 12, 0, 0) <=> 2440587 + assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(1970, 1, 1, 12, 0, 0) <=> 2440588 assert_equal(-1, DateTime.civil(1970, 1, 1, 12, 0, 0) <=> 2440589) end def test_compare_with_float - assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(1970) <=> 2440586.5 - assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(1970) <=> 2440587.5 + assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(1970) <=> 2440586.5 + assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(1970) <=> 2440587.5 assert_equal(-1, DateTime.civil(1970) <=> 2440588.5) end def test_compare_with_rational - assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(1970) <=> Rational(4881173, 2) - assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(1970) <=> Rational(4881175, 2) + assert_equal 1, DateTime.civil(1970) <=> Rational(4881173, 2) + assert_equal 0, DateTime.civil(1970) <=> Rational(4881175, 2) assert_equal(-1, DateTime.civil(1970) <=> Rational(4881177, 2)) end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/duration_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/duration_test.rb index dbee543644..63934e2433 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/duration_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/duration_test.rb @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ require "active_support/inflector" require "active_support/time" require "active_support/json" require "time_zone_test_helpers" +require "yaml" class DurationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase include TimeZoneTestHelpers @@ -15,30 +16,30 @@ class DurationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_kind_of ActiveSupport::Duration, d assert_kind_of Numeric, d assert_kind_of Integer, d - assert !d.is_a?(Hash) + assert_not d.is_a?(Hash) k = Class.new class << k; undef_method :== end - assert !d.is_a?(k) + assert_not d.is_a?(k) end def test_instance_of - assert 1.minute.instance_of?(1.class) + assert 1.minute.instance_of?(Integer) assert 2.days.instance_of?(ActiveSupport::Duration) - assert !3.second.instance_of?(Numeric) + assert_not 3.second.instance_of?(Numeric) end def test_threequals assert ActiveSupport::Duration === 1.day - assert !(ActiveSupport::Duration === 1.day.to_i) - assert !(ActiveSupport::Duration === "foo") + assert_not (ActiveSupport::Duration === 1.day.to_i) + assert_not (ActiveSupport::Duration === "foo") end def test_equals assert 1.day == 1.day assert 1.day == 1.day.to_i assert 1.day.to_i == 1.day - assert !(1.day == "foo") + assert_not (1.day == "foo") end def test_to_s @@ -52,11 +53,11 @@ class DurationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert 1.minute.eql?(1.minute) assert 1.minute.eql?(60.seconds) assert 2.days.eql?(48.hours) - assert !1.second.eql?(1) - assert !1.eql?(1.second) + assert_not 1.second.eql?(1) + assert_not 1.eql?(1.second) assert 1.minute.eql?(180.seconds - 2.minutes) - assert !1.minute.eql?(60) - assert !1.minute.eql?("foo") + assert_not 1.minute.eql?(60) + assert_not 1.minute.eql?("foo") end def test_inspect @@ -71,6 +72,8 @@ class DurationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal "7 days", 7.days.inspect assert_equal "1 week", 1.week.inspect assert_equal "2 weeks", 1.fortnight.inspect + assert_equal "0 seconds", (10 % 5.seconds).inspect + assert_equal "10 minutes", (10.minutes + 0.seconds).inspect end def test_inspect_locale @@ -155,6 +158,18 @@ class DurationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal Date.civil(2017, 1, 3), Date.civil(2017, 1, 1) + 1.day * 2 end + def test_date_added_with_multiplied_duration_larger_than_one_month + assert_equal Date.civil(2017, 2, 15), Date.civil(2017, 1, 1) + 1.day * 45 + end + + def test_date_added_with_divided_duration + assert_equal Date.civil(2017, 1, 3), Date.civil(2017, 1, 1) + 4.days / 2 + end + + def test_date_added_with_divided_duration_larger_than_one_month + assert_equal Date.civil(2017, 2, 15), Date.civil(2017, 1, 1) + 90.days / 2 + end + def test_plus_with_time assert_equal 1 + 1.second, 1.second + 1, "Duration + Numeric should == Numeric + Duration" end @@ -640,6 +655,12 @@ class DurationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal time + d1, time + d2 end + def test_durations_survive_yaml_serialization + d1 = YAML.load(YAML.dump(10.minutes)) + assert_equal 600, d1.to_i + assert_equal 660, (d1 + 60).to_i + end + private def eastern_time_zone if Gem.win_platform? diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/enumerable_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/enumerable_test.rb index 8d71320931..b63464a36a 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/enumerable_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/enumerable_test.rb @@ -179,6 +179,21 @@ class EnumerableTests < ActiveSupport::TestCase payments.index_by.each(&:price)) end + def test_index_with + payments = GenericEnumerable.new([ Payment.new(5), Payment.new(15), Payment.new(10) ]) + + assert_equal({ Payment.new(5) => 5, Payment.new(15) => 15, Payment.new(10) => 10 }, payments.index_with(&:price)) + + assert_equal({ title: nil, body: nil }, %i( title body ).index_with(nil)) + assert_equal({ title: [], body: [] }, %i( title body ).index_with([])) + assert_equal({ title: {}, body: {} }, %i( title body ).index_with({})) + + assert_equal Enumerator, payments.index_with.class + assert_nil payments.index_with.size + assert_equal 42, (1..42).index_with.size + assert_equal({ Payment.new(5) => 5, Payment.new(15) => 15, Payment.new(10) => 10 }, payments.index_with.each(&:price)) + end + def test_many assert_equal false, GenericEnumerable.new([]).many? assert_equal false, GenericEnumerable.new([ 1 ]).many? diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/file_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/file_test.rb index 23e3c277cc..186c863f91 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/file_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/file_test.rb @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ class AtomicWriteTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase contents = "Atomic Text" File.atomic_write(file_name, Dir.pwd) do |file| file.write(contents) - assert !File.exist?(file_name) + assert_not File.exist?(file_name) end assert File.exist?(file_name) assert_equal contents, File.read(file_name) @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ class AtomicWriteTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase raise "something bad" end rescue - assert !File.exist?(file_name) + assert_not File.exist?(file_name) end def test_atomic_write_preserves_file_permissions @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ class AtomicWriteTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase contents = "Atomic Text" File.atomic_write(file_name, Dir.pwd) do |file| file.write(contents) - assert !File.exist?(file_name) + assert_not File.exist?(file_name) end assert File.exist?(file_name) assert_equal File.probe_stat_in(Dir.pwd).mode, file_mode @@ -59,6 +59,20 @@ class AtomicWriteTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase File.unlink(file_name) rescue nil end + def test_atomic_write_preserves_file_permissions_same_directory + Dir.mktmpdir do |temp_dir| + File.chmod 0700, temp_dir + + probed_permissions = File.probe_stat_in(temp_dir).mode.to_s(8) + + File.atomic_write(File.join(temp_dir, file_name), &:close) + + actual_permissions = File.stat(File.join(temp_dir, file_name)).mode.to_s(8) + + assert_equal actual_permissions, probed_permissions + end + end + def test_atomic_write_returns_result_from_yielded_block block_return_value = File.atomic_write(file_name, Dir.pwd) do |file| "Hello world!" diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash/transform_keys_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash/transform_keys_test.rb deleted file mode 100644 index b9e41f7b25..0000000000 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash/transform_keys_test.rb +++ /dev/null @@ -1,64 +0,0 @@ -# frozen_string_literal: true - -require "abstract_unit" -require "active_support/core_ext/hash/keys" - -class TransformKeysTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase - test "transform_keys returns a new hash with the keys computed from the block" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - mapped = original.transform_keys { |k| "#{k}!".to_sym } - - assert_equal({ a: "a", b: "b" }, original) - assert_equal({ a!: "a", b!: "b" }, mapped) - end - - test "transform_keys! modifies the keys of the original" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - mapped = original.transform_keys! { |k| "#{k}!".to_sym } - - assert_equal({ a!: "a", b!: "b" }, original) - assert_same original, mapped - end - - test "transform_keys returns a sized Enumerator if no block is given" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - enumerator = original.transform_keys - assert_equal original.size, enumerator.size - assert_equal Enumerator, enumerator.class - end - - test "transform_keys! returns a sized Enumerator if no block is given" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - enumerator = original.transform_keys! - assert_equal original.size, enumerator.size - assert_equal Enumerator, enumerator.class - end - - test "transform_keys is chainable with Enumerable methods" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - mapped = original.transform_keys.with_index { |k, i| [k, i].join.to_sym } - assert_equal({ a0: "a", b1: "b" }, mapped) - end - - test "transform_keys! is chainable with Enumerable methods" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - original.transform_keys!.with_index { |k, i| [k, i].join.to_sym } - assert_equal({ a0: "a", b1: "b" }, original) - end - - test "transform_keys returns a Hash instance when self is inherited from Hash" do - class HashDescendant < ::Hash - def initialize(elements = nil) - super(elements) - (elements || {}).each_pair { |key, value| self[key] = value } - end - end - - original = HashDescendant.new(a: "a", b: "b") - mapped = original.transform_keys { |k| "#{k}!".to_sym } - - assert_equal({ a: "a", b: "b" }, original) - assert_equal({ a!: "a", b!: "b" }, mapped) - assert_equal(::Hash, mapped.class) - end -end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash/transform_values_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash/transform_values_test.rb index d34b7fa7b9..e481b5e4a9 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash/transform_values_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash/transform_values_test.rb @@ -2,25 +2,16 @@ require "abstract_unit" require "active_support/core_ext/hash/indifferent_access" -require "active_support/core_ext/hash/transform_values" -class TransformValuesTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase - test "transform_values returns a new hash with the values computed from the block" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - mapped = original.transform_values { |v| v + "!" } - - assert_equal({ a: "a", b: "b" }, original) - assert_equal({ a: "a!", b: "b!" }, mapped) - end - - test "transform_values! modifies the values of the original" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - mapped = original.transform_values! { |v| v + "!" } - - assert_equal({ a: "a!", b: "b!" }, original) - assert_same original, mapped +class TransformValuesDeprecatedRequireTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase + test "requiring transform_values is deprecated" do + assert_deprecated do + require "active_support/core_ext/hash/transform_values" + end end +end +class IndifferentTransformValuesTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase test "indifferent access is still indifferent after mapping values" do original = { a: "a", b: "b" }.with_indifferent_access mapped = original.transform_values { |v| v + "!" } @@ -28,50 +19,4 @@ class TransformValuesTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal "a!", mapped[:a] assert_equal "a!", mapped["a"] end - - # This is to be consistent with the behavior of Ruby's built in methods - # (e.g. #select, #reject) as of 2.2 - test "default values do not persist during mapping" do - original = Hash.new("foo") - original[:a] = "a" - mapped = original.transform_values { |v| v + "!" } - - assert_equal "a!", mapped[:a] - assert_nil mapped[:b] - end - - test "default procs do not persist after mapping" do - original = Hash.new { "foo" } - original[:a] = "a" - mapped = original.transform_values { |v| v + "!" } - - assert_equal "a!", mapped[:a] - assert_nil mapped[:b] - end - - test "transform_values returns a sized Enumerator if no block is given" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - enumerator = original.transform_values - assert_equal original.size, enumerator.size - assert_equal Enumerator, enumerator.class - end - - test "transform_values! returns a sized Enumerator if no block is given" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - enumerator = original.transform_values! - assert_equal original.size, enumerator.size - assert_equal Enumerator, enumerator.class - end - - test "transform_values is chainable with Enumerable methods" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - mapped = original.transform_values.with_index { |v, i| [v, i].join } - assert_equal({ a: "a0", b: "b1" }, mapped) - end - - test "transform_values! is chainable with Enumerable methods" do - original = { a: "a", b: "b" } - original.transform_values!.with_index { |v, i| [v, i].join } - assert_equal({ a: "a0", b: "b1" }, original) - end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash_ext_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash_ext_test.rb index 746d7ad416..8572d56722 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash_ext_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/hash_ext_test.rb @@ -31,10 +31,10 @@ class HashExtTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_methods h = {} - assert_respond_to h, :transform_keys - assert_respond_to h, :transform_keys! assert_respond_to h, :deep_transform_keys assert_respond_to h, :deep_transform_keys! + assert_respond_to h, :deep_transform_values + assert_respond_to h, :deep_transform_values! assert_respond_to h, :symbolize_keys assert_respond_to h, :symbolize_keys! assert_respond_to h, :deep_symbolize_keys @@ -45,24 +45,10 @@ class HashExtTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_respond_to h, :deep_stringify_keys! assert_respond_to h, :to_options assert_respond_to h, :to_options! - assert_respond_to h, :compact - assert_respond_to h, :compact! assert_respond_to h, :except assert_respond_to h, :except! end - def test_transform_keys - assert_equal @upcase_strings, @strings.transform_keys { |key| key.to_s.upcase } - assert_equal @upcase_strings, @symbols.transform_keys { |key| key.to_s.upcase } - assert_equal @upcase_strings, @mixed.transform_keys { |key| key.to_s.upcase } - end - - def test_transform_keys_not_mutates - transformed_hash = @mixed.dup - transformed_hash.transform_keys { |key| key.to_s.upcase } - assert_equal @mixed, transformed_hash - end - def test_deep_transform_keys assert_equal @nested_upcase_strings, @nested_symbols.deep_transform_keys { |key| key.to_s.upcase } assert_equal @nested_upcase_strings, @nested_strings.deep_transform_keys { |key| key.to_s.upcase } @@ -78,19 +64,6 @@ class HashExtTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal @nested_mixed, transformed_hash end - def test_transform_keys! - assert_equal @upcase_strings, @symbols.dup.transform_keys! { |key| key.to_s.upcase } - assert_equal @upcase_strings, @strings.dup.transform_keys! { |key| key.to_s.upcase } - assert_equal @upcase_strings, @mixed.dup.transform_keys! { |key| key.to_s.upcase } - end - - def test_transform_keys_with_bang_mutates - transformed_hash = @mixed.dup - transformed_hash.transform_keys! { |key| key.to_s.upcase } - assert_equal @upcase_strings, transformed_hash - assert_equal({ :a => 1, "b" => 2 }, @mixed) - end - def test_deep_transform_keys! assert_equal @nested_upcase_strings, @nested_symbols.deep_dup.deep_transform_keys! { |key| key.to_s.upcase } assert_equal @nested_upcase_strings, @nested_strings.deep_dup.deep_transform_keys! { |key| key.to_s.upcase } @@ -107,6 +80,31 @@ class HashExtTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal({ "a" => { b: { "c" => 3 } } }, @nested_mixed) end + def test_deep_transform_values + assert_equal({ "a" => "1", "b" => "2" }, @strings.deep_transform_values { |value| value.to_s }) + assert_equal({ "a" => { "b" => { "c" => "3" } } }, @nested_strings.deep_transform_values { |value| value.to_s }) + assert_equal({ "a" => [ { "b" => "2" }, { "c" => "3" }, "4" ] }, @string_array_of_hashes.deep_transform_values { |value| value.to_s }) + end + + def test_deep_transform_values_not_mutates + transformed_hash = @nested_mixed.deep_dup + transformed_hash.deep_transform_values { |value| value.to_s } + assert_equal @nested_mixed, transformed_hash + end + + def test_deep_transform_values! + assert_equal({ "a" => "1", "b" => "2" }, @strings.deep_transform_values! { |value| value.to_s }) + assert_equal({ "a" => { "b" => { "c" => "3" } } }, @nested_strings.deep_transform_values! { |value| value.to_s }) + assert_equal({ "a" => [ { "b" => "2" }, { "c" => "3" }, "4" ] }, @string_array_of_hashes.deep_transform_values! { |value| value.to_s }) + end + + def test_deep_transform_values_with_bang_mutates + transformed_hash = @nested_mixed.deep_dup + transformed_hash.deep_transform_values! { |value| value.to_s } + assert_equal({ "a" => { b: { "c" => "3" } } }, transformed_hash) + assert_equal({ "a" => { b: { "c" => 3 } } }, @nested_mixed) + end + def test_symbolize_keys assert_equal @symbols, @symbols.symbolize_keys assert_equal @symbols, @strings.symbolize_keys @@ -339,30 +337,16 @@ class HashExtTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal expected, merged end - def test_slice - original = { a: "x", b: "y", c: 10 } - expected = { a: "x", b: "y" } - - # Should return a new hash with only the given keys. - assert_equal expected, original.slice(:a, :b) - assert_not_equal expected, original - end - def test_slice_inplace original = { a: "x", b: "y", c: 10 } - expected = { c: 10 } + expected_return = { c: 10 } + expected_original = { a: "x", b: "y" } - # Should replace the hash with only the given keys. - assert_equal expected, original.slice!(:a, :b) - end + # Should return a hash containing the removed key/value pairs. + assert_equal expected_return, original.slice!(:a, :b) - def test_slice_with_an_array_key - original = { :a => "x", :b => "y", :c => 10, [:a, :b] => "an array key" } - expected = { [:a, :b] => "an array key", :c => 10 } - - # Should return a new hash with only the given keys when given an array key. - assert_equal expected, original.slice([:a, :b], :c) - assert_not_equal expected, original + # Should replace the hash with only the given keys. + assert_equal expected_original, original end def test_slice_inplace_with_an_array_key @@ -373,14 +357,6 @@ class HashExtTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal expected, original.slice!([:a, :b], :c) end - def test_slice_with_splatted_keys - original = { :a => "x", :b => "y", :c => 10, [:a, :b] => "an array key" } - expected = { a: "x", b: "y" } - - # Should grab each of the splatted keys. - assert_equal expected, original.slice(*[:a, :b]) - end - def test_slice_bang_does_not_override_default hash = Hash.new(0) hash.update(a: 1, b: 2) @@ -446,7 +422,7 @@ class HashExtTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase original.freeze assert_nothing_raised { original.except(:a) } - assert_raise(RuntimeError) { original.except!(:a) } + assert_raise(FrozenError) { original.except!(:a) } end def test_except_does_not_delete_values_in_original @@ -456,38 +432,10 @@ class HashExtTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end end - def test_compact - hash_contain_nil_value = @symbols.merge(z: nil) - hash_with_only_nil_values = { a: nil, b: nil } - - h = hash_contain_nil_value.dup - assert_equal(@symbols, h.compact) - assert_equal(hash_contain_nil_value, h) - - h = hash_with_only_nil_values.dup - assert_equal({}, h.compact) - assert_equal(hash_with_only_nil_values, h) - - h = @symbols.dup - assert_equal(@symbols, h.compact) - assert_equal(@symbols, h) - end - - def test_compact! - hash_contain_nil_value = @symbols.merge(z: nil) - hash_with_only_nil_values = { a: nil, b: nil } - - h = hash_contain_nil_value.dup - assert_equal(@symbols, h.compact!) - assert_equal(@symbols, h) - - h = hash_with_only_nil_values.dup - assert_equal({}, h.compact!) - assert_equal({}, h) - - h = @symbols.dup - assert_nil(h.compact!) - assert_equal(@symbols, h) + def test_requiring_compact_is_deprecated + assert_deprecated do + require "active_support/core_ext/hash/compact" + end end end @@ -1061,7 +1009,7 @@ class HashToXmlTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase </alert> XML alert_at = Hash.from_xml(alert_xml)["alert"]["alert_at"] - assert alert_at.utc? + assert_predicate alert_at, :utc? assert_equal Time.utc(2008, 2, 10, 15, 30, 45), alert_at end @@ -1072,7 +1020,7 @@ class HashToXmlTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase </alert> XML alert_at = Hash.from_xml(alert_xml)["alert"]["alert_at"] - assert alert_at.utc? + assert_predicate alert_at, :utc? assert_equal Time.utc(2008, 2, 10, 15, 30, 45), alert_at end @@ -1083,7 +1031,7 @@ class HashToXmlTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase </alert> XML alert_at = Hash.from_xml(alert_xml)["alert"]["alert_at"] - assert alert_at.utc? + assert_predicate alert_at, :utc? assert_equal 2050, alert_at.year assert_equal 2, alert_at.month assert_equal 10, alert_at.day diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/integer_ext_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/integer_ext_test.rb index 14169b084d..5691dc5341 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/integer_ext_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/integer_ext_test.rb @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ class IntegerExtTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_multiple_of [ -7, 0, 7, 14 ].each { |i| assert i.multiple_of?(7) } - [ -7, 7, 14 ].each { |i| assert ! i.multiple_of?(6) } + [ -7, 7, 14 ].each { |i| assert_not i.multiple_of?(6) } # test the 0 edge case assert 0.multiple_of?(0) - assert !5.multiple_of?(0) + assert_not 5.multiple_of?(0) # test with a prime - [2, 3, 5, 7].each { |i| assert !PRIME.multiple_of?(i) } + [2, 3, 5, 7].each { |i| assert_not PRIME.multiple_of?(i) } end def test_ordinalize diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/load_error_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/load_error_test.rb index 41b11d0c33..6d3726e407 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/load_error_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/load_error_test.rb @@ -7,13 +7,19 @@ class TestLoadError < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_with_require assert_raise(LoadError) { require "no_this_file_don't_exist" } end + def test_with_load assert_raise(LoadError) { load "nor_does_this_one" } end + def test_path - begin load "nor/this/one.rb" - rescue LoadError => e - assert_equal "nor/this/one.rb", e.path - end + load "nor/this/one.rb" + rescue LoadError => e + assert_equal "nor/this/one.rb", e.path + end + + def test_is_missing_with_nil_path + error = LoadError.new(nil) + assert_nothing_raised { error.is_missing?("anything") } end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/anonymous_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/anonymous_test.rb index 606f22c9b5..e03c217015 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/anonymous_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/anonymous_test.rb @@ -5,12 +5,12 @@ require "active_support/core_ext/module/anonymous" class AnonymousTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase test "an anonymous class or module are anonymous" do - assert Module.new.anonymous? - assert Class.new.anonymous? + assert_predicate Module.new, :anonymous? + assert_predicate Class.new, :anonymous? end test "a named class or module are not anonymous" do - assert !Kernel.anonymous? - assert !Object.anonymous? + assert_not_predicate Kernel, :anonymous? + assert_not_predicate Object, :anonymous? end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attr_internal_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attr_internal_test.rb index c2a28eced4..9a65f75497 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attr_internal_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attr_internal_test.rb @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ class AttrInternalTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_reader assert_nothing_raised { @target.attr_internal_reader :foo } - assert !@instance.instance_variable_defined?("@_foo") + assert_not @instance.instance_variable_defined?("@_foo") assert_raise(NoMethodError) { @instance.foo = 1 } @instance.instance_variable_set("@_foo", 1) @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ class AttrInternalTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_writer assert_nothing_raised { @target.attr_internal_writer :foo } - assert !@instance.instance_variable_defined?("@_foo") + assert_not @instance.instance_variable_defined?("@_foo") assert_nothing_raised { assert_equal 1, @instance.foo = 1 } assert_equal 1, @instance.instance_variable_get("@_foo") @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ class AttrInternalTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_accessor assert_nothing_raised { @target.attr_internal :foo } - assert !@instance.instance_variable_defined?("@_foo") + assert_not @instance.instance_variable_defined?("@_foo") assert_nothing_raised { assert_equal 1, @instance.foo = 1 } assert_equal 1, @instance.instance_variable_get("@_foo") @@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ class AttrInternalTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_nothing_raised { Module.attr_internal_naming_format = "@abc%sdef" } @target.attr_internal :foo - assert !@instance.instance_variable_defined?("@_foo") - assert !@instance.instance_variable_defined?("@abcfoodef") + assert_not @instance.instance_variable_defined?("@_foo") + assert_not @instance.instance_variable_defined?("@abcfoodef") assert_nothing_raised { @instance.foo = 1 } - assert !@instance.instance_variable_defined?("@_foo") + assert_not @instance.instance_variable_defined?("@_foo") assert @instance.instance_variable_defined?("@abcfoodef") ensure Module.attr_internal_naming_format = "@_%s" diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_accessor_per_thread_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_accessor_per_thread_test.rb index e0fbd1002c..e0e331fc91 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_accessor_per_thread_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_accessor_per_thread_test.rb @@ -43,22 +43,22 @@ class ModuleAttributeAccessorPerThreadTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_respond_to @class, :foo assert_respond_to @class, :foo= assert_respond_to @object, :bar - assert !@object.respond_to?(:bar=) + assert_not_respond_to @object, :bar= end.join end def test_should_not_create_instance_reader Thread.new do assert_respond_to @class, :shaq - assert !@object.respond_to?(:shaq) + assert_not_respond_to @object, :shaq end.join end def test_should_not_create_instance_accessors Thread.new do assert_respond_to @class, :camp - assert !@object.respond_to?(:camp) - assert !@object.respond_to?(:camp=) + assert_not_respond_to @object, :camp + assert_not_respond_to @object, :camp= end.join end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_accessor_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_accessor_test.rb index f1d6859a88..33c583947a 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_accessor_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_accessor_test.rb @@ -65,18 +65,18 @@ class ModuleAttributeAccessorTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_respond_to @module, :foo assert_respond_to @module, :foo= assert_respond_to @object, :bar - assert !@object.respond_to?(:bar=) + assert_not_respond_to @object, :bar= end def test_should_not_create_instance_reader assert_respond_to @module, :shaq - assert !@object.respond_to?(:shaq) + assert_not_respond_to @object, :shaq end def test_should_not_create_instance_accessors assert_respond_to @module, :camp - assert !@object.respond_to?(:camp) - assert !@object.respond_to?(:camp=) + assert_not_respond_to @object, :camp + assert_not_respond_to @object, :camp= end def test_should_raise_name_error_if_attribute_name_is_invalid diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_aliasing_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_aliasing_test.rb index 187a0f4da2..81aac224f9 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_aliasing_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/attribute_aliasing_test.rb @@ -30,15 +30,15 @@ class AttributeAliasingTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_attribute_alias e = AttributeAliasing::Email.new - assert !e.subject? + assert_not_predicate e, :subject? e.title = "Upgrade computer" assert_equal "Upgrade computer", e.subject - assert e.subject? + assert_predicate e, :subject? e.subject = "We got a long way to go" assert_equal "We got a long way to go", e.title - assert e.title? + assert_predicate e, :title? end def test_aliasing_to_uppercase_attributes @@ -47,15 +47,15 @@ class AttributeAliasingTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase # to more sensible ones, everything goes *foof*. e = AttributeAliasing::Email.new - assert !e.body? - assert !e.Data? + assert_not_predicate e, :body? + assert_not_predicate e, :Data? e.body = "No, really, this is not a joke." assert_equal "No, really, this is not a joke.", e.Data - assert e.Data? + assert_predicate e, :Data? e.Data = "Uppercased methods are the suck" assert_equal "Uppercased methods are the suck", e.body - assert e.body? + assert_predicate e, :body? end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/concerning_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/concerning_test.rb index 192c3d5a9c..38fd60463d 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/concerning_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/concerning_test.rb @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ require "active_support/core_ext/module/concerning" class ModuleConcerningTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_concerning_declares_a_concern_and_includes_it_immediately - klass = Class.new { concerning(:Foo) {} } + klass = Class.new { concerning(:Foo) { } } assert_includes klass.ancestors, klass::Foo, klass.ancestors.inspect end end @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ class ModuleConcernTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase # Declares a concern but doesn't include it assert klass.const_defined?(:Baz, false) - assert !ModuleConcernTest.const_defined?(:Baz) + assert_not ModuleConcernTest.const_defined?(:Baz) assert_kind_of ActiveSupport::Concern, klass::Baz assert_not_includes klass.ancestors, klass::Baz, klass.ancestors.inspect @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ class ModuleConcernTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_using_class_methods_blocks_instead_of_ClassMethods_module - assert !Foo.respond_to?(:will_be_orphaned) - assert Foo.respond_to?(:hacked_on) - assert Foo.respond_to?(:nicer_dsl) - assert Foo.respond_to?(:doesnt_clobber) + assert_not_respond_to Foo, :will_be_orphaned + assert_respond_to Foo, :hacked_on + assert_respond_to Foo, :nicer_dsl + assert_respond_to Foo, :doesnt_clobber # Orphan in Foo::ClassMethods, not Bar::ClassMethods. assert Foo.const_defined?(:ClassMethods) diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/introspection_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/introspection_test.rb index 76d3012239..d8409d5e44 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/introspection_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/introspection_test.rb @@ -15,25 +15,43 @@ module ParentA end class IntrospectionTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase + def test_module_parent_name + assert_equal "ParentA", ParentA::B.module_parent_name + assert_equal "ParentA::B", ParentA::B::C.module_parent_name + assert_nil ParentA.module_parent_name + end + + def test_module_parent_name_when_frozen + assert_equal "ParentA", ParentA::FrozenB.module_parent_name + assert_equal "ParentA::B", ParentA::B::FrozenC.module_parent_name + end + def test_parent_name - assert_equal "ParentA", ParentA::B.parent_name - assert_equal "ParentA::B", ParentA::B::C.parent_name - assert_nil ParentA.parent_name + assert_deprecated do + assert_equal "ParentA", ParentA::B.parent_name + end end - def test_parent_name_when_frozen - assert_equal "ParentA", ParentA::FrozenB.parent_name - assert_equal "ParentA::B", ParentA::B::FrozenC.parent_name + def test_module_parent + assert_equal ParentA::B, ParentA::B::C.module_parent + assert_equal ParentA, ParentA::B.module_parent + assert_equal Object, ParentA.module_parent end def test_parent - assert_equal ParentA::B, ParentA::B::C.parent - assert_equal ParentA, ParentA::B.parent - assert_equal Object, ParentA.parent + assert_deprecated do + assert_equal ParentA, ParentA::B.parent + end + end + + def test_module_parents + assert_equal [ParentA::B, ParentA, Object], ParentA::B::C.module_parents + assert_equal [ParentA, Object], ParentA::B.module_parents end def test_parents - assert_equal [ParentA::B, ParentA, Object], ParentA::B::C.parents - assert_equal [ParentA, Object], ParentA::B.parents + assert_deprecated do + assert_equal [ParentA, Object], ParentA::B.parents + end end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/reachable_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/reachable_test.rb deleted file mode 100644 index 097a72fa5b..0000000000 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/reachable_test.rb +++ /dev/null @@ -1,51 +0,0 @@ -# frozen_string_literal: true - -require "abstract_unit" -require "active_support/core_ext/module/reachable" - -class AnonymousTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase - test "an anonymous class or module is not reachable" do - assert_deprecated do - assert !Module.new.reachable? - assert !Class.new.reachable? - end - end - - test "ordinary named classes or modules are reachable" do - assert_deprecated do - assert Kernel.reachable? - assert Object.reachable? - end - end - - test "a named class or module whose constant has gone is not reachable" do - c = eval "class C; end; C" - m = eval "module M; end; M" - - self.class.send(:remove_const, :C) - self.class.send(:remove_const, :M) - - assert_deprecated do - assert !c.reachable? - assert !m.reachable? - end - end - - test "a named class or module whose constants store different objects are not reachable" do - c = eval "class C; end; C" - m = eval "module M; end; M" - - self.class.send(:remove_const, :C) - self.class.send(:remove_const, :M) - - eval "class C; end" - eval "module M; end" - - assert_deprecated do - assert C.reachable? - assert M.reachable? - assert !c.reachable? - assert !m.reachable? - end - end -end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/remove_method_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/remove_method_test.rb index 8493be8d08..a18fc0a5e4 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/remove_method_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module/remove_method_test.rb @@ -32,14 +32,14 @@ class RemoveMethodTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase RemoveMethodTests::A.class_eval { remove_possible_method(:do_something) } - assert !RemoveMethodTests::A.new.respond_to?(:do_something) + assert_not_respond_to RemoveMethodTests::A.new, :do_something end def test_remove_singleton_method_from_an_object RemoveMethodTests::A.class_eval { remove_possible_singleton_method(:do_something_else) } - assert !RemoveMethodTests::A.respond_to?(:do_something_else) + assert_not_respond_to RemoveMethodTests::A, :do_something_else end def test_redefine_method_in_an_object diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module_test.rb index e918823074..04692f1484 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/module_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/module_test.rb @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ class ModuleTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_delegation_with_method_arguments has_block = HasBlock.new(Block.new) - assert has_block.hello? + assert_predicate has_block, :hello? end def test_delegate_missing_to_with_method @@ -383,9 +383,9 @@ class ModuleTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_delegate_missing_to_affects_respond_to - assert DecoratedTester.new(@david).respond_to?(:name) - assert_not DecoratedTester.new(@david).respond_to?(:private_name) - assert_not DecoratedTester.new(@david).respond_to?(:my_fake_method) + assert_respond_to DecoratedTester.new(@david), :name + assert_not_respond_to DecoratedTester.new(@david), :private_name + assert_not_respond_to DecoratedTester.new(@david), :my_fake_method assert DecoratedTester.new(@david).respond_to?(:name, true) assert_not DecoratedTester.new(@david).respond_to?(:private_name, true) @@ -414,8 +414,8 @@ class ModuleTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase place = location.new(Somewhere.new("Such street", "Sad city")) - assert_not place.respond_to?(:street) - assert_not place.respond_to?(:city) + assert_not_respond_to place, :street + assert_not_respond_to place, :city assert place.respond_to?(:street, true) # Asking for private method assert place.respond_to?(:city, true) @@ -432,12 +432,79 @@ class ModuleTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase place = location.new(Somewhere.new("Such street", "Sad city")) - assert_not place.respond_to?(:street) - assert_not place.respond_to?(:city) + assert_not_respond_to place, :street + assert_not_respond_to place, :city - assert_not place.respond_to?(:the_street) + assert_not_respond_to place, :the_street assert place.respond_to?(:the_street, true) - assert_not place.respond_to?(:the_city) + assert_not_respond_to place, :the_city assert place.respond_to?(:the_city, true) end + + def test_private_delegate_with_private_option + location = Class.new do + def initialize(place) + @place = place + end + + delegate(:street, :city, to: :@place, private: true) + end + + place = location.new(Somewhere.new("Such street", "Sad city")) + + assert_not_respond_to place, :street + assert_not_respond_to place, :city + + assert place.respond_to?(:street, true) # Asking for private method + assert place.respond_to?(:city, true) + end + + def test_some_public_some_private_delegate_with_private_option + location = Class.new do + def initialize(place) + @place = place + end + + delegate(:street, to: :@place) + delegate(:city, to: :@place, private: true) + end + + place = location.new(Somewhere.new("Such street", "Sad city")) + + assert_respond_to place, :street + assert_not_respond_to place, :city + + assert place.respond_to?(:city, true) # Asking for private method + end + + def test_private_delegate_prefixed_with_private_option + location = Class.new do + def initialize(place) + @place = place + end + + delegate(:street, :city, to: :@place, prefix: :the, private: true) + end + + place = location.new(Somewhere.new("Such street", "Sad city")) + + assert_not_respond_to place, :the_street + assert place.respond_to?(:the_street, true) + assert_not_respond_to place, :the_city + assert place.respond_to?(:the_city, true) + end + + def test_delegate_with_private_option_returns_names_of_delegate_methods + location = Class.new do + def initialize(place) + @place = place + end + end + + assert_equal [:street, :city], + location.delegate(:street, :city, to: :@place, private: true) + + assert_equal [:the_street, :the_city], + location.delegate(:street, :city, to: :@place, prefix: :the, private: true) + end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/name_error_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/name_error_test.rb index d1dace3713..5c6c12ffc7 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/name_error_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/name_error_test.rb @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ class NameErrorTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase exc = assert_raise NameError do some_method_that_does_not_exist end - assert !exc.missing_name?(:Foo) + assert_not exc.missing_name?(:Foo) assert_nil exc.missing_name end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/numeric_ext_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/numeric_ext_test.rb index 4b9073da54..5005b9febd 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/numeric_ext_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/numeric_ext_test.rb @@ -406,86 +406,9 @@ class NumericExtFormattingTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal 10_000, 10.seconds.in_milliseconds end - # TODO: Remove positive and negative tests when we drop support to ruby < 2.3 - b = 2**64 - - T_ZERO = b.coerce(0).first - T_ONE = b.coerce(1).first - T_MONE = b.coerce(-1).first - - def test_positive - assert_predicate(1, :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(0, :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(-1, :positive?) - assert_predicate(+1.0, :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(+0.0, :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(-0.0, :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(-1.0, :positive?) - assert_predicate(+(0.0.next_float), :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(-(0.0.next_float), :positive?) - assert_predicate(Float::INFINITY, :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(-Float::INFINITY, :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(Float::NAN, :positive?) - - a = Class.new(Numeric) do - def >(x); true; end - end.new - assert_predicate(a, :positive?) - - a = Class.new(Numeric) do - def >(x); false; end - end.new - assert_not_predicate(a, :positive?) - - assert_predicate(1 / 2r, :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(-1 / 2r, :positive?) - - assert_predicate(T_ONE, :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(T_MONE, :positive?) - assert_not_predicate(T_ZERO, :positive?) - - e = assert_raises(NoMethodError) do - Complex(1).positive? + def test_requiring_inquiry_is_deprecated + assert_deprecated do + require "active_support/core_ext/numeric/inquiry" end - - assert_match(/positive\?/, e.message) - end - - def test_negative - assert_predicate(-1, :negative?) - assert_not_predicate(0, :negative?) - assert_not_predicate(1, :negative?) - assert_predicate(-1.0, :negative?) - assert_not_predicate(-0.0, :negative?) - assert_not_predicate(+0.0, :negative?) - assert_not_predicate(+1.0, :negative?) - assert_predicate(-(0.0.next_float), :negative?) - assert_not_predicate(+(0.0.next_float), :negative?) - assert_predicate(-Float::INFINITY, :negative?) - assert_not_predicate(Float::INFINITY, :negative?) - assert_not_predicate(Float::NAN, :negative?) - - a = Class.new(Numeric) do - def <(x); true; end - end.new - assert_predicate(a, :negative?) - - a = Class.new(Numeric) do - def <(x); false; end - end.new - assert_not_predicate(a, :negative?) - - assert_predicate(-1 / 2r, :negative?) - assert_not_predicate(1 / 2r, :negative?) - - assert_not_predicate(T_ONE, :negative?) - assert_predicate(T_MONE, :negative?) - assert_not_predicate(T_ZERO, :negative?) - - e = assert_raises(NoMethodError) do - Complex(1).negative? - end - - assert_match(/negative\?/, e.message) end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/acts_like_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/acts_like_test.rb index 9f7b81f7fc..31241caf0a 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/acts_like_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/acts_like_test.rb @@ -17,19 +17,19 @@ class ObjectTests < ActiveSupport::TestCase dt = DateTime.new duck = DuckTime.new - assert !object.acts_like?(:time) - assert !object.acts_like?(:date) + assert_not object.acts_like?(:time) + assert_not object.acts_like?(:date) assert time.acts_like?(:time) - assert !time.acts_like?(:date) + assert_not time.acts_like?(:date) - assert !date.acts_like?(:time) + assert_not date.acts_like?(:time) assert date.acts_like?(:date) assert dt.acts_like?(:time) assert dt.acts_like?(:date) assert duck.acts_like?(:time) - assert !duck.acts_like?(:date) + assert_not duck.acts_like?(:date) end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/blank_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/blank_test.rb index 749e59ec00..954f415383 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/blank_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/blank_test.rb @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ class BlankTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end end - BLANK = [ EmptyTrue.new, nil, false, "", " ", " \n\t \r ", " ", "\u00a0", [], {} ] - NOT = [ EmptyFalse.new, Object.new, true, 0, 1, "a", [nil], { nil => 0 }, Time.now ] + BLANK = [ EmptyTrue.new, nil, false, "", " ", " \n\t \r ", " ", "\u00a0", [], {}, " ".encode("UTF-16LE") ] + NOT = [ EmptyFalse.new, Object.new, true, 0, 1, "a", [nil], { nil => 0 }, Time.now, "my value".encode("UTF-16LE") ] def test_blank BLANK.each { |v| assert_equal true, v.blank?, "#{v.inspect} should be blank" } diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/deep_dup_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/deep_dup_test.rb index 2486592441..1fb26ebac7 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/deep_dup_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/deep_dup_test.rb @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ class DeepDupTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase object = Object.new dup = object.deep_dup dup.instance_variable_set(:@a, 1) - assert !object.instance_variable_defined?(:@a) + assert_not object.instance_variable_defined?(:@a) assert dup.instance_variable_defined?(:@a) end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/duplicable_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/duplicable_test.rb index b984becce3..5203434ae6 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/duplicable_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/duplicable_test.rb @@ -9,15 +9,9 @@ class DuplicableTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase if RUBY_VERSION >= "2.5.0" RAISE_DUP = [method(:puts)] ALLOW_DUP = ["1", "symbol_from_string".to_sym, Object.new, /foo/, [], {}, Time.now, Class.new, Module.new, BigDecimal("4.56"), nil, false, true, 1, 2.3, Complex(1), Rational(1)] - elsif RUBY_VERSION >= "2.4.1" + else RAISE_DUP = [method(:puts), Complex(1), Rational(1)] ALLOW_DUP = ["1", "symbol_from_string".to_sym, Object.new, /foo/, [], {}, Time.now, Class.new, Module.new, BigDecimal("4.56"), nil, false, true, 1, 2.3] - elsif RUBY_VERSION >= "2.4.0" # Due to 2.4.0 bug. This elsif cannot be removed unless we drop 2.4.0 support... - RAISE_DUP = [method(:puts), Complex(1), Rational(1), "symbol_from_string".to_sym] - ALLOW_DUP = ["1", Object.new, /foo/, [], {}, Time.now, Class.new, Module.new, BigDecimal("4.56"), nil, false, true, 1, 2.3] - else - RAISE_DUP = [nil, false, true, :symbol, 1, 2.3, method(:puts), Complex(1), Rational(1)] - ALLOW_DUP = ["1", Object.new, /foo/, [], {}, Time.now, Class.new, Module.new, BigDecimal("4.56")] end def test_duplicable @@ -25,7 +19,7 @@ class DuplicableTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase "* https://github.com/rubinius/rubinius/issues/3089" RAISE_DUP.each do |v| - assert !v.duplicable?, "#{ v.inspect } should not be duplicable" + assert_not v.duplicable?, "#{ v.inspect } should not be duplicable" assert_raises(TypeError, v.class.name) { v.dup } end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/inclusion_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/inclusion_test.rb index 52c21f2e8e..8cbb4f848f 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/inclusion_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/inclusion_test.rb @@ -6,30 +6,30 @@ require "active_support/core_ext/object/inclusion" class InTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_in_array assert 1.in?([1, 2]) - assert !3.in?([1, 2]) + assert_not 3.in?([1, 2]) end def test_in_hash h = { "a" => 100, "b" => 200 } assert "a".in?(h) - assert !"z".in?(h) + assert_not "z".in?(h) end def test_in_string assert "lo".in?("hello") - assert !"ol".in?("hello") + assert_not "ol".in?("hello") assert ?h.in?("hello") end def test_in_range assert 25.in?(1..50) - assert !75.in?(1..50) + assert_not 75.in?(1..50) end def test_in_set s = Set.new([1, 2]) assert 1.in?(s) - assert !3.in?(s) + assert_not 3.in?(s) end module A @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ class InTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_in_module assert A.in?(B) assert A.in?(C) - assert !A.in?(A) - assert !A.in?(D) + assert_not A.in?(A) + assert_not A.in?(D) end def test_no_method_catching diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/instance_variables_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/instance_variables_test.rb index a3d8daab5b..9052d209a3 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/instance_variables_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/instance_variables_test.rb @@ -19,15 +19,15 @@ class ObjectInstanceVariableTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_instance_exec_passes_arguments_to_block - assert_equal %w(hello goodbye), "hello".dup.instance_exec("goodbye") { |v| [self, v] } + assert_equal %w(hello goodbye), (+"hello").instance_exec("goodbye") { |v| [self, v] } end def test_instance_exec_with_frozen_obj - assert_equal %w(olleh goodbye), "hello".freeze.instance_exec("goodbye") { |v| [reverse, v] } + assert_equal %w(olleh goodbye), "hello".instance_exec("goodbye") { |v| [reverse, v] } end def test_instance_exec_nested - assert_equal %w(goodbye olleh bar), "hello".dup.instance_exec("goodbye") { |arg| + assert_equal %w(goodbye olleh bar), (+"hello").instance_exec("goodbye") { |arg| [arg] + instance_exec("bar") { |v| [reverse, v] } } end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/to_query_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/to_query_test.rb index 7593bcfa4d..561dadbbcf 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/to_query_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/to_query_test.rb @@ -77,6 +77,20 @@ class ToQueryTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal "name=Nakshay&type=human", hash.to_query end + def test_hash_not_sorted_lexicographically_for_nested_structure + params = { + "foo" => { + "contents" => [ + { "name" => "gorby", "id" => "123" }, + { "name" => "puff", "d" => "true" } + ] + } + } + expected = "foo[contents][][name]=gorby&foo[contents][][id]=123&foo[contents][][name]=puff&foo[contents][][d]=true" + + assert_equal expected, URI.decode_www_form_component(params.to_query) + end + private def assert_query_equal(expected, actual) assert_equal expected.split("&"), actual.to_query.split("&") diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/try_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/try_test.rb index fe68b24bf5..a838334034 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/try_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/object/try_test.rb @@ -10,25 +10,25 @@ class ObjectTryTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_nonexisting_method method = :undefined_method - assert !@string.respond_to?(method) + assert_not_respond_to @string, method assert_nil @string.try(method) end def test_nonexisting_method_with_arguments method = :undefined_method - assert !@string.respond_to?(method) + assert_not_respond_to @string, method assert_nil @string.try(method, "llo", "y") end def test_nonexisting_method_bang method = :undefined_method - assert !@string.respond_to?(method) + assert_not_respond_to @string, method assert_raise(NoMethodError) { @string.try!(method) } end def test_nonexisting_method_with_arguments_bang method = :undefined_method - assert !@string.respond_to?(method) + assert_not_respond_to @string, method assert_raise(NoMethodError) { @string.try!(method, "llo", "y") } end @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ class ObjectTryTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_try_with_private_method_bang klass = Class.new do private - def private_method "private method" end @@ -90,7 +89,6 @@ class ObjectTryTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_try_with_private_method klass = Class.new do private - def private_method "private method" end @@ -109,7 +107,6 @@ class ObjectTryTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end private - def private_delegator_method "private delegator method" end @@ -120,11 +117,11 @@ class ObjectTryTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_try_with_method_on_delegator_target - assert_equal 5, Decorator.new(@string).size + assert_equal 5, Decorator.new(@string).try(:size) end def test_try_with_overridden_method_on_delegator - assert_equal "overridden reverse", Decorator.new(@string).reverse + assert_equal "overridden reverse", Decorator.new(@string).try(:reverse) end def test_try_with_private_method_on_delegator @@ -140,7 +137,6 @@ class ObjectTryTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_try_with_private_method_on_delegator_target klass = Class.new do private - def private_method "private method" end @@ -152,7 +148,6 @@ class ObjectTryTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_try_with_private_method_on_delegator_target_bang klass = Class.new do private - def private_method "private method" end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/range_ext_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/range_ext_test.rb index 903c173e59..4b8efb8a93 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/range_ext_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/range_ext_test.rb @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ class RangeTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_overlaps_last_exclusive - assert !(1...5).overlaps?(5..10) + assert_not (1...5).overlaps?(5..10) end def test_overlaps_first_inclusive @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ class RangeTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_overlaps_first_exclusive - assert !(5..10).overlaps?(1...5) + assert_not (5..10).overlaps?(1...5) end def test_should_include_identical_inclusive @@ -102,20 +102,20 @@ class RangeTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_no_overlaps_on_time time_range_1 = Time.utc(2005, 12, 10, 15, 30)..Time.utc(2005, 12, 10, 17, 30) time_range_2 = Time.utc(2005, 12, 10, 17, 31)..Time.utc(2005, 12, 10, 18, 00) - assert !time_range_1.overlaps?(time_range_2) + assert_not time_range_1.overlaps?(time_range_2) end def test_each_on_time_with_zone twz = ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(nil, ActiveSupport::TimeZone["Eastern Time (US & Canada)"], Time.utc(2006, 11, 28, 10, 30)) assert_raises TypeError do - ((twz - 1.hour)..twz).each {} + ((twz - 1.hour)..twz).each { } end end def test_step_on_time_with_zone twz = ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(nil, ActiveSupport::TimeZone["Eastern Time (US & Canada)"], Time.utc(2006, 11, 28, 10, 30)) assert_raises TypeError do - ((twz - 1.hour)..twz).step(1) {} + ((twz - 1.hour)..twz).step(1) { } end end @@ -131,11 +131,11 @@ class RangeTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_date_time_with_each datetime = DateTime.now - assert(((datetime - 1.hour)..datetime).each {}) + assert(((datetime - 1.hour)..datetime).each { }) end def test_date_time_with_step datetime = DateTime.now - assert(((datetime - 1.hour)..datetime).step(1) {}) + assert(((datetime - 1.hour)..datetime).step(1) { }) end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/regexp_ext_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/regexp_ext_test.rb index 5737bdafda..7d18297b64 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/regexp_ext_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/regexp_ext_test.rb @@ -9,28 +9,4 @@ class RegexpExtAccessTests < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal false, //.multiline? assert_equal false, /(?m:)/.multiline? end - - # Based on https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/test/ruby/test_regexp.rb. - def test_match_p - /back(...)/ =~ "backref" - # must match here, but not in a separate method, e.g., assert_send, - # to check if $~ is affected or not. - assert_equal false, //.match?(nil) - assert_equal true, //.match?("") - assert_equal true, /.../.match?(:abc) - assert_raise(TypeError) { /.../.match?(Object.new) } - assert_equal true, /b/.match?("abc") - assert_equal true, /b/.match?("abc", 1) - assert_equal true, /../.match?("abc", 1) - assert_equal true, /../.match?("abc", -2) - assert_equal false, /../.match?("abc", -4) - assert_equal false, /../.match?("abc", 4) - assert_equal true, /\z/.match?("") - assert_equal true, /\z/.match?("abc") - assert_equal true, /R.../.match?("Ruby") - assert_equal false, /R.../.match?("Ruby", 1) - assert_equal false, /P.../.match?("Ruby") - assert_equal "backref", $& - assert_equal "ref", $1 - end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/secure_random_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/secure_random_test.rb index 7067fb524c..4b73233971 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/secure_random_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/secure_random_test.rb @@ -19,4 +19,24 @@ class SecureRandomTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_not_equal s1, s2 assert_equal 24, s1.length end + + def test_base36 + s1 = SecureRandom.base36 + s2 = SecureRandom.base36 + + assert_not_equal s1, s2 + assert_equal 16, s1.length + assert_match(/^[a-z0-9]+$/, s1) + assert_match(/^[a-z0-9]+$/, s2) + end + + def test_base36_with_length + s1 = SecureRandom.base36(24) + s2 = SecureRandom.base36(24) + + assert_not_equal s1, s2 + assert_equal 24, s1.length + assert_match(/^[a-z0-9]+$/, s1) + assert_match(/^[a-z0-9]+$/, s2) + end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/string_ext_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/string_ext_test.rb index 5c5abe9fd1..2468fe3603 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/string_ext_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/string_ext_test.rb @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ require "constantize_test_cases" require "active_support/inflector" require "active_support/core_ext/string" require "active_support/time" -require "active_support/core_ext/string/strip" require "active_support/core_ext/string/output_safety" require "active_support/core_ext/string/indent" +require "active_support/core_ext/string/strip" require "time_zone_test_helpers" require "yaml" @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ class StringInflectionsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal "", "".strip_heredoc end + def test_strip_heredoc_on_a_frozen_string + assert "".strip_heredoc.frozen? + end + def test_strip_heredoc_on_a_string_with_no_lines assert_equal "x", "x".strip_heredoc assert_equal "x", " x".strip_heredoc @@ -233,16 +237,16 @@ class StringInflectionsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase s = "hello" assert s.starts_with?("h") assert s.starts_with?("hel") - assert !s.starts_with?("el") + assert_not s.starts_with?("el") assert s.ends_with?("o") assert s.ends_with?("lo") - assert !s.ends_with?("el") + assert_not s.ends_with?("el") end def test_string_squish - original = %{\u205f\u3000 A string surrounded by various unicode spaces, - with tabs(\t\t), newlines(\n\n), unicode nextlines(\u0085\u0085) and many spaces( ). \u00a0\u2007}.dup + original = +%{\u205f\u3000 A string surrounded by various unicode spaces, + with tabs(\t\t), newlines(\n\n), unicode nextlines(\u0085\u0085) and many spaces( ). \u00a0\u2007} expected = "A string surrounded by various unicode spaces, " \ "with tabs( ), newlines( ), unicode nextlines( ) and many spaces( )." @@ -259,8 +263,8 @@ class StringInflectionsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_string_inquiry - assert "production".inquiry.production? - assert !"production".inquiry.development? + assert_predicate "production".inquiry, :production? + assert_not_predicate "production".inquiry, :development? end def test_truncate @@ -281,6 +285,68 @@ class StringInflectionsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal "Hello Big[...]", "Hello Big World!".truncate(15, omission: "[...]", separator: /\s/) end + def test_truncate_bytes + assert_equal "👍👍👍👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(16) + assert_equal "👍👍👍👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(16, omission: nil) + assert_equal "👍👍👍👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(16, omission: " ") + assert_equal "👍👍👍👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(16, omission: "🖖") + + assert_equal "👍👍👍…", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(15) + assert_equal "👍👍👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(15, omission: nil) + assert_equal "👍👍👍 ", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(15, omission: " ") + assert_equal "👍👍🖖", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(15, omission: "🖖") + + assert_equal "…", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(5) + assert_equal "👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(5, omission: nil) + assert_equal "👍 ", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(5, omission: " ") + assert_equal "🖖", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(5, omission: "🖖") + + assert_equal "…", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(4) + assert_equal "👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(4, omission: nil) + assert_equal " ", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(4, omission: " ") + assert_equal "🖖", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(4, omission: "🖖") + + assert_raise ArgumentError do + "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(3, omission: "🖖") + end + end + + def test_truncate_bytes_preserves_codepoints + assert_equal "👍👍👍👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(16) + assert_equal "👍👍👍👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(16, omission: nil) + assert_equal "👍👍👍👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(16, omission: " ") + assert_equal "👍👍👍👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(16, omission: "🖖") + + assert_equal "👍👍👍…", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(15) + assert_equal "👍👍👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(15, omission: nil) + assert_equal "👍👍👍 ", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(15, omission: " ") + assert_equal "👍👍🖖", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(15, omission: "🖖") + + assert_equal "…", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(5) + assert_equal "👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(5, omission: nil) + assert_equal "👍 ", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(5, omission: " ") + assert_equal "🖖", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(5, omission: "🖖") + + assert_equal "…", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(4) + assert_equal "👍", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(4, omission: nil) + assert_equal " ", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(4, omission: " ") + assert_equal "🖖", "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(4, omission: "🖖") + + assert_raise ArgumentError do + "👍👍👍👍".truncate_bytes(3, omission: "🖖") + end + end + + def test_truncates_bytes_preserves_grapheme_clusters + assert_equal "a ", "a ❤️ b".truncate_bytes(2, omission: nil) + assert_equal "a ", "a ❤️ b".truncate_bytes(3, omission: nil) + assert_equal "a ", "a ❤️ b".truncate_bytes(7, omission: nil) + assert_equal "a ❤️", "a ❤️ b".truncate_bytes(8, omission: nil) + + assert_equal "a ", "a 👩❤️👩".truncate_bytes(13, omission: nil) + assert_equal "", "👩❤️👩".truncate_bytes(13, omission: nil) + end + def test_truncate_words assert_equal "Hello Big World!", "Hello Big World!".truncate_words(3) assert_equal "Hello Big...", "Hello Big World!".truncate_words(2) @@ -312,12 +378,12 @@ class StringInflectionsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_truncate_multibyte - assert_equal "\354\225\204\353\246\254\353\236\221 \354\225\204\353\246\254 ...".dup.force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8), - "\354\225\204\353\246\254\353\236\221 \354\225\204\353\246\254 \354\225\204\353\235\274\353\246\254\354\230\244".dup.force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8).truncate(10) + assert_equal (+"\354\225\204\353\246\254\353\236\221 \354\225\204\353\246\254 ...").force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8), + (+"\354\225\204\353\246\254\353\236\221 \354\225\204\353\246\254 \354\225\204\353\235\274\353\246\254\354\230\244").force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8).truncate(10) end def test_truncate_should_not_be_html_safe - assert !"Hello World!".truncate(12).html_safe? + assert_not_predicate "Hello World!".truncate(12), :html_safe? end def test_remove @@ -334,7 +400,7 @@ class StringInflectionsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_remove! - original = "This is a very good day to die".dup + original = +"This is a very good day to die" assert_equal "This is a good day to die", original.remove!(" very") assert_equal "This is a good day to die", original assert_equal "This is a good day", original.remove!(" to ", /die/) @@ -403,6 +469,15 @@ class StringAccessTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_not_same different_string, string end + test "#first with negative Integer is deprecated" do + string = "hello" + message = "Calling String#first with a negative integer limit " \ + "will raise an ArgumentError in Rails 6.1." + assert_deprecated(message) do + string.first(-1) + end + end + test "#last returns the last character" do assert_equal "o", "hello".last assert_equal "x", "x".last @@ -421,6 +496,15 @@ class StringAccessTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_not_same different_string, string end + test "#last with negative Integer is deprecated" do + string = "hello" + message = "Calling String#last with a negative integer limit " \ + "will raise an ArgumentError in Rails 6.1." + assert_deprecated(message) do + string.last(-1) + end + end + test "access returns a real string" do hash = {} hash["h"] = true @@ -639,7 +723,7 @@ end class StringBehaviourTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_acts_like_string - assert "Bambi".acts_like_string? + assert_predicate "Bambi", :acts_like_string? end end @@ -654,10 +738,10 @@ class CoreExtStringMultibyteTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_string_should_recognize_utf8_strings - assert UTF8_STRING.is_utf8? - assert ASCII_STRING.is_utf8? - assert !EUC_JP_STRING.is_utf8? - assert !INVALID_UTF8_STRING.is_utf8? + assert_predicate UTF8_STRING, :is_utf8? + assert_predicate ASCII_STRING, :is_utf8? + assert_not_predicate EUC_JP_STRING, :is_utf8? + assert_not_predicate INVALID_UTF8_STRING, :is_utf8? end def test_mb_chars_returns_instance_of_proxy_class @@ -667,7 +751,7 @@ end class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def setup - @string = "hello".dup + @string = +"hello" @object = Class.new(Object) do def to_s "other" @@ -676,12 +760,12 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end test "A string is unsafe by default" do - assert !@string.html_safe? + assert_not_predicate @string, :html_safe? end test "A string can be marked safe" do string = @string.html_safe - assert string.html_safe? + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? end test "Marking a string safe returns the string" do @@ -689,15 +773,15 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end test "An integer is safe by default" do - assert 5.html_safe? + assert_predicate 5, :html_safe? end test "a float is safe by default" do - assert 5.7.html_safe? + assert_predicate 5.7, :html_safe? end test "An object is unsafe by default" do - assert !@object.html_safe? + assert_not_predicate @object, :html_safe? end test "Adding an object to a safe string returns a safe string" do @@ -705,7 +789,7 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase string << @object assert_equal "helloother", string - assert string.html_safe? + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? end test "Adding a safe string to another safe string returns a safe string" do @@ -714,7 +798,7 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase @combination = @other_string + string assert_equal "otherhello", @combination - assert @combination.html_safe? + assert_predicate @combination, :html_safe? end test "Adding an unsafe string to a safe string escapes it and returns a safe string" do @@ -725,36 +809,36 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase assert_equal "other<foo>", @combination assert_equal "hello<foo>", @other_combination - assert @combination.html_safe? - assert !@other_combination.html_safe? + assert_predicate @combination, :html_safe? + assert_not_predicate @other_combination, :html_safe? end test "Prepending safe onto unsafe yields unsafe" do @string.prepend "other".html_safe - assert !@string.html_safe? + assert_not_predicate @string, :html_safe? assert_equal "otherhello", @string end test "Prepending unsafe onto safe yields escaped safe" do other = "other".html_safe other.prepend "<foo>" - assert other.html_safe? + assert_predicate other, :html_safe? assert_equal "<foo>other", other end test "Concatting safe onto unsafe yields unsafe" do - @other_string = "other".dup + @other_string = +"other" string = @string.html_safe @other_string.concat(string) - assert !@other_string.html_safe? + assert_not_predicate @other_string, :html_safe? end test "Concatting unsafe onto safe yields escaped safe" do @other_string = "other".html_safe string = @other_string.concat("<foo>") assert_equal "other<foo>", string - assert string.html_safe? + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? end test "Concatting safe onto safe yields safe" do @@ -762,22 +846,22 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase string = @string.html_safe @other_string.concat(string) - assert @other_string.html_safe? + assert_predicate @other_string, :html_safe? end test "Concatting safe onto unsafe with << yields unsafe" do - @other_string = "other".dup + @other_string = +"other" string = @string.html_safe @other_string << string - assert !@other_string.html_safe? + assert_not_predicate @other_string, :html_safe? end test "Concatting unsafe onto safe with << yields escaped safe" do @other_string = "other".html_safe string = @other_string << "<foo>" assert_equal "other<foo>", string - assert string.html_safe? + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? end test "Concatting safe onto safe with << yields safe" do @@ -785,7 +869,7 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase string = @string.html_safe @other_string << string - assert @other_string.html_safe? + assert_predicate @other_string, :html_safe? end test "Concatting safe onto unsafe with % yields unsafe" do @@ -793,7 +877,7 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase string = @string.html_safe @other_string = @other_string % string - assert !@other_string.html_safe? + assert_not_predicate @other_string, :html_safe? end test "Concatting unsafe onto safe with % yields escaped safe" do @@ -801,7 +885,7 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase string = @other_string % "<foo>" assert_equal "other<foo>", string - assert string.html_safe? + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? end test "Concatting safe onto safe with % yields safe" do @@ -809,7 +893,7 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase string = @string.html_safe @other_string = @other_string % string - assert @other_string.html_safe? + assert_predicate @other_string, :html_safe? end test "Concatting with % doesn't modify a string" do @@ -822,8 +906,56 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase test "Concatting an integer to safe always yields safe" do string = @string.html_safe string = string.concat(13) - assert_equal "hello".dup.concat(13), string - assert string.html_safe? + assert_equal (+"hello").concat(13), string + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? + end + + test "Inserting safe into safe yields safe" do + string = "foo".html_safe + string.insert(0, "<b>".html_safe) + + assert_equal "<b>foo", string + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? + end + + test "Inserting unsafe into safe yields escaped safe" do + string = "foo".html_safe + string.insert(0, "<b>") + + assert_equal "<b>foo", string + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? + end + + test "Replacing safe with safe yields safe" do + string = "foo".html_safe + string.replace("<b>".html_safe) + + assert_equal "<b>", string + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? + end + + test "Replacing safe with unsafe yields escaped safe" do + string = "foo".html_safe + string.replace("<b>") + + assert_equal "<b>", string + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? + end + + test "Replacing index of safe with safe yields safe" do + string = "foo".html_safe + string[0] = "<b>".html_safe + + assert_equal "<b>oo", string + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? + end + + test "Replacing index of safe with unsafe yields escaped safe" do + string = "foo".html_safe + string[0] = "<b>" + + assert_equal "<b>oo", string + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? end test "emits normal string yaml" do @@ -832,8 +964,8 @@ class OutputSafetyTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase test "call to_param returns a normal string" do string = @string.html_safe - assert string.html_safe? - assert !string.to_param.html_safe? + assert_predicate string, :html_safe? + assert_not_predicate string.to_param, :html_safe? end test "ERB::Util.html_escape should escape unsafe characters" do diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/time_ext_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/time_ext_test.rb index 01cf1938be..7078f3506d 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/time_ext_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/time_ext_test.rb @@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ class TimeExtCalculationsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_acts_like_time - assert Time.new.acts_like_time? + assert_predicate Time.new, :acts_like_time? end def test_formatted_offset_with_utc @@ -756,26 +756,26 @@ class TimeExtCalculationsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_compare_with_time - assert_equal 1, Time.utc(2000) <=> Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59, 999) - assert_equal 0, Time.utc(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) + assert_equal 1, Time.utc(2000) <=> Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59, 999) + assert_equal 0, Time.utc(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) assert_equal(-1, Time.utc(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 001)) end def test_compare_with_datetime - assert_equal 1, Time.utc(2000) <=> DateTime.civil(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59) - assert_equal 0, Time.utc(2000) <=> DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) + assert_equal 1, Time.utc(2000) <=> DateTime.civil(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59) + assert_equal 0, Time.utc(2000) <=> DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) assert_equal(-1, Time.utc(2000) <=> DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1)) end def test_compare_with_time_with_zone - assert_equal 1, Time.utc(2000) <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - assert_equal 0, Time.utc(2000) <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) + assert_equal 1, Time.utc(2000) <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) + assert_equal 0, Time.utc(2000) <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) assert_equal(-1, Time.utc(2000) <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"])) end def test_compare_with_string - assert_equal 1, Time.utc(2000) <=> Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59, 999).to_s - assert_equal 0, Time.utc(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0).to_s + assert_equal 1, Time.utc(2000) <=> Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59, 999).to_s + assert_equal 0, Time.utc(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0).to_s assert_equal(-1, Time.utc(2000) <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0).to_s) assert_nil Time.utc(2000) <=> "Invalid as Time" end @@ -863,11 +863,11 @@ class TimeExtCalculationsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_minus_with_time_with_zone - assert_equal 86_400.0, Time.utc(2000, 1, 2) - ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) + assert_equal 86_400.0, Time.utc(2000, 1, 2) - ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) end def test_minus_with_datetime - assert_equal 86_400.0, Time.utc(2000, 1, 2) - DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1) + assert_equal 86_400.0, Time.utc(2000, 1, 2) - DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1) end def test_time_created_with_local_constructor_cannot_represent_times_during_hour_skipped_by_dst @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ class TimeExtCalculationsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase # On Apr 2 2006 at 2:00AM in US, clocks were moved forward to 3:00AM. # Therefore, 2AM EST doesn't exist for this date; Time.local fails over to 3:00AM EDT assert_equal Time.local(2006, 4, 2, 3), Time.local(2006, 4, 2, 2) - assert Time.local(2006, 4, 2, 2).dst? + assert_predicate Time.local(2006, 4, 2, 2), :dst? end end @@ -950,39 +950,39 @@ class TimeExtCalculationsTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end class TimeExtMarshalingTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase - def test_marshaling_with_utc_instance + def test_marshalling_with_utc_instance t = Time.utc(2000) - unmarshaled = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)) - assert_equal "UTC", unmarshaled.zone - assert_equal t, unmarshaled + unmarshalled = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)) + assert_equal "UTC", unmarshalled.zone + assert_equal t, unmarshalled end - def test_marshaling_with_local_instance + def test_marshalling_with_local_instance t = Time.local(2000) - unmarshaled = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)) - assert_equal t.zone, unmarshaled.zone - assert_equal t, unmarshaled + unmarshalled = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)) + assert_equal t.zone, unmarshalled.zone + assert_equal t, unmarshalled end - def test_marshaling_with_frozen_utc_instance + def test_marshalling_with_frozen_utc_instance t = Time.utc(2000).freeze - unmarshaled = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)) - assert_equal "UTC", unmarshaled.zone - assert_equal t, unmarshaled + unmarshalled = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)) + assert_equal "UTC", unmarshalled.zone + assert_equal t, unmarshalled end - def test_marshaling_with_frozen_local_instance + def test_marshalling_with_frozen_local_instance t = Time.local(2000).freeze - unmarshaled = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)) - assert_equal t.zone, unmarshaled.zone - assert_equal t, unmarshaled + unmarshalled = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)) + assert_equal t.zone, unmarshalled.zone + assert_equal t, unmarshalled end def test_marshalling_preserves_fractional_seconds t = Time.parse("00:00:00.500") - unmarshaled = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)) - assert_equal t.to_f, unmarshaled.to_f - assert_equal t, unmarshaled + unmarshalled = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)) + assert_equal t.to_f, unmarshalled.to_f + assert_equal t, unmarshalled end def test_last_quarter_on_31st diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/time_with_zone_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/time_with_zone_test.rb index b25747eadb..f6e836e446 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/time_with_zone_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/time_with_zone_test.rb @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ require "abstract_unit" require "active_support/time" require "time_zone_test_helpers" -require "active_support/core_ext/string/strip" require "yaml" class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase @@ -163,7 +162,7 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_to_yaml - yaml = <<-EOF.strip_heredoc + yaml = <<~EOF --- !ruby/object:ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone utc: 2000-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 Z zone: !ruby/object:ActiveSupport::TimeZone @@ -175,7 +174,7 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_ruby_to_yaml - yaml = <<-EOF.strip_heredoc + yaml = <<~EOF --- twz: !ruby/object:ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone utc: 2000-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 Z @@ -188,7 +187,7 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_yaml_load - yaml = <<-EOF.strip_heredoc + yaml = <<~EOF --- !ruby/object:ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone utc: 2000-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 Z zone: !ruby/object:ActiveSupport::TimeZone @@ -200,7 +199,7 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_ruby_yaml_load - yaml = <<-EOF.strip_heredoc + yaml = <<~EOF --- twz: !ruby/object:ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone utc: 2000-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 Z @@ -221,20 +220,20 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_compare_with_time - assert_equal 1, @twz <=> Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59) - assert_equal 0, @twz <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) + assert_equal 1, @twz <=> Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59) + assert_equal 0, @twz <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) assert_equal(-1, @twz <=> Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1)) end def test_compare_with_datetime - assert_equal 1, @twz <=> DateTime.civil(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59) - assert_equal 0, @twz <=> DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) + assert_equal 1, @twz <=> DateTime.civil(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59) + assert_equal 0, @twz <=> DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) assert_equal(-1, @twz <=> DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1)) end def test_compare_with_time_with_zone - assert_equal 1, @twz <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - assert_equal 0, @twz <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) + assert_equal 1, @twz <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) + assert_equal 0, @twz <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) assert_equal(-1, @twz <=> ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"])) end @@ -290,6 +289,20 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end end + def test_before + twz = ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0), @time_zone) + assert_equal false, twz.before?(ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2017, 3, 6, 11, 59, 59), @time_zone)) + assert_equal false, twz.before?(ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0), @time_zone)) + assert_equal true, twz.before?(ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2017, 3, 6, 12, 00, 1), @time_zone)) + end + + def test_after + twz = ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0), @time_zone) + assert_equal true, twz.after?(ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2017, 3, 6, 11, 59, 59), @time_zone)) + assert_equal false, twz.after?(ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2017, 3, 6, 12, 0, 0), @time_zone)) + assert_equal false, twz.after?(ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2017, 3, 6, 12, 00, 1), @time_zone)) + end + def test_eql? assert_equal true, @twz.eql?(@twz.dup) assert_equal true, @twz.eql?(Time.utc(2000)) @@ -340,13 +353,13 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_minus_with_time - assert_equal 86_400.0, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 2), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - Time.utc(2000, 1, 1) - assert_equal 86_400.0, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 2), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["Hawaii"]) - Time.utc(2000, 1, 1) + assert_equal 86_400.0, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 2), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - Time.utc(2000, 1, 1) + assert_equal 86_400.0, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 2), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["Hawaii"]) - Time.utc(2000, 1, 1) end def test_minus_with_time_precision - assert_equal 86_399.999999998, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 2, 23, 59, 59, Rational(999999999, 1000)), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - Time.utc(2000, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, Rational(1, 1000)) - assert_equal 86_399.999999998, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 2, 23, 59, 59, Rational(999999999, 1000)), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["Hawaii"]) - Time.utc(2000, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, Rational(1, 1000)) + assert_equal 86_399.999999998, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 2, 23, 59, 59, Rational(999999999, 1000)), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - Time.utc(2000, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, Rational(1, 1000)) + assert_equal 86_399.999999998, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 2, 23, 59, 59, Rational(999999999, 1000)), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["Hawaii"]) - Time.utc(2000, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, Rational(1, 1000)) end def test_minus_with_time_with_zone @@ -358,20 +371,20 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_minus_with_time_with_zone_precision twz1 = ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, Rational(1, 1000)), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) twz2 = ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 23, 59, 59, Rational(999999999, 1000)), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - assert_equal 86_399.999999998, twz2 - twz1 + assert_equal 86_399.999999998, twz2 - twz1 end def test_minus_with_datetime - assert_equal 86_400.0, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 2), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1) + assert_equal 86_400.0, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 2), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1) end def test_minus_with_datetime_precision - assert_equal 86_399.999999999, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 23, 59, 59, Rational(999999999, 1000)), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1) + assert_equal 86_399.999999999, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 23, 59, 59, Rational(999999999, 1000)), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1) end def test_minus_with_wrapped_datetime - assert_equal 86_400.0, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 2), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - Time.utc(2000, 1, 1) - assert_equal 86_400.0, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 2), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1) + assert_equal 86_400.0, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 2), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - Time.utc(2000, 1, 1) + assert_equal 86_400.0, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 2), ActiveSupport::TimeZone["UTC"]) - DateTime.civil(2000, 1, 1) end def test_plus_and_minus_enforce_spring_dst_rules @@ -481,7 +494,7 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_acts_like_time - assert @twz.acts_like_time? + assert_predicate @twz, :acts_like_time? assert @twz.acts_like?(:time) assert ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.new(DateTime.civil(2000), @time_zone).acts_like?(:time) end @@ -492,7 +505,7 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase end def test_blank? - assert_not @twz.blank? + assert_not_predicate @twz, :blank? end def test_is_a @@ -514,10 +527,10 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase marshal_str = Marshal.dump(@twz) mtime = Marshal.load(marshal_str) assert_equal Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0), mtime.utc - assert mtime.utc.utc? + assert_predicate mtime.utc, :utc? assert_equal ActiveSupport::TimeZone["Eastern Time (US & Canada)"], mtime.time_zone assert_equal Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 19), mtime.time - assert mtime.time.utc? + assert_predicate mtime.time, :utc? assert_equal @twz.inspect, mtime.inspect end @@ -526,16 +539,16 @@ class TimeWithZoneTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase marshal_str = Marshal.dump(twz) mtime = Marshal.load(marshal_str) assert_equal Time.utc(2000, 1, 1, 0), mtime.utc - assert mtime.utc.utc? + assert_predicate mtime.utc, :utc? assert_equal "America/New_York", mtime.time_zone.name assert_equal Time.utc(1999, 12, 31, 19), mtime.time - assert mtime.time.utc? + assert_predicate mtime.time, :utc? assert_equal @twz.inspect, mtime.inspect end def test_freeze @twz.freeze - assert @twz.frozen? + assert_predicate @twz, :frozen? end def test_freeze_preloads_instance_variables @@ -1035,8 +1048,8 @@ class TimeWithZoneMethodsForTimeAndDateTimeTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_nil_time_zone Time.use_zone nil do - assert !@t.in_time_zone.respond_to?(:period), "no period method" - assert !@dt.in_time_zone.respond_to?(:period), "no period method" + assert_not_respond_to @t.in_time_zone, :period, "no period method" + assert_not_respond_to @dt.in_time_zone, :period, "no period method" end end @@ -1092,7 +1105,7 @@ class TimeWithZoneMethodsForTimeAndDateTimeTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_use_zone_raises_on_invalid_timezone Time.zone = "Alaska" assert_raise ArgumentError do - Time.use_zone("No such timezone exists") {} + Time.use_zone("No such timezone exists") { } end assert_equal ActiveSupport::TimeZone["Alaska"], Time.zone end @@ -1224,7 +1237,7 @@ class TimeWithZoneMethodsForDate < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_nil_time_zone with_tz_default nil do - assert !@d.in_time_zone.respond_to?(:period), "no period method" + assert_not_respond_to @d.in_time_zone, :period, "no period method" end end @@ -1273,9 +1286,9 @@ class TimeWithZoneMethodsForString < ActiveSupport::TestCase def test_nil_time_zone with_tz_default nil do - assert !@s.in_time_zone.respond_to?(:period), "no period method" - assert !@u.in_time_zone.respond_to?(:period), "no period method" - assert !@z.in_time_zone.respond_to?(:period), "no period method" + assert_not_respond_to @s.in_time_zone, :period, "no period method" + assert_not_respond_to @u.in_time_zone, :period, "no period method" + assert_not_respond_to @z.in_time_zone, :period, "no period method" end end diff --git a/activesupport/test/core_ext/uri_ext_test.rb b/activesupport/test/core_ext/uri_ext_test.rb index 8816b0d392..c0686bc720 100644 --- a/activesupport/test/core_ext/uri_ext_test.rb +++ b/activesupport/test/core_ext/uri_ext_test.rb @@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ class URIExtTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase str = "\xE6\x97\xA5\xE6\x9C\xAC\xE8\xAA\x9E" # Ni-ho-nn-go in UTF-8, means Japanese. parser = URI.parser - assert_equal str, parser.unescape(parser.escape(str)) + assert_equal str + str, parser.unescape(str + parser.escape(str).encode(Encoding::UTF_8)) end end |