diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'activemodel/lib/active_model/validations')
6 files changed, 46 insertions, 49 deletions
diff --git a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/callbacks.rb b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/callbacks.rb index c39c85e1af..dbafd0bd1a 100644 --- a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/callbacks.rb +++ b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/callbacks.rb @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ module ActiveModel # Provides an interface for any class to have <tt>before_validation</tt> and # <tt>after_validation</tt> callbacks. # - # First, extend ActiveModel::Callbacks from the class you are creating: + # First, include ActiveModel::Validations::Callbacks from the class you are + # creating: # # class MyModel # include ActiveModel::Validations::Callbacks diff --git a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/clusivity.rb b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/clusivity.rb new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b632a2bd6b --- /dev/null +++ b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/clusivity.rb @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +require 'active_support/core_ext/range.rb' + +module ActiveModel + module Validations + module Clusivity + ERROR_MESSAGE = "An object with the method #include? or a proc or lambda is required, " << + "and must be supplied as the :in option of the configuration hash" + + def check_validity! + unless [:include?, :call].any?{ |method| options[:in].respond_to?(method) } + raise ArgumentError, ERROR_MESSAGE + end + end + + private + + def include?(record, value) + delimiter = options[:in] + exclusions = delimiter.respond_to?(:call) ? delimiter.call(record) : delimiter + exclusions.send(inclusion_method(exclusions), value) + end + + # In Ruby 1.9 <tt>Range#include?</tt> on non-numeric ranges checks all possible values in the + # range for equality, so it may be slow for large ranges. The new <tt>Range#cover?</tt> + # uses the previous logic of comparing a value with the range endpoints. + def inclusion_method(enumerable) + enumerable.is_a?(Range) ? :cover? : :include? + end + end + end +end diff --git a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/confirmation.rb b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/confirmation.rb index e8526303e2..69ab74734d 100644 --- a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/confirmation.rb +++ b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/confirmation.rb @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ module ActiveModel class ConfirmationValidator < EachValidator def validate_each(record, attribute, value) if (confirmed = record.send("#{attribute}_confirmation")) && (value != confirmed) - record.errors.add(attribute, :confirmation, options) + human_attribute_name = record.class.human_attribute_name(attribute) + record.errors.add(:"#{attribute}_confirmation", :confirmation, options.merge(:attribute => human_attribute_name)) end end diff --git a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/exclusion.rb b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/exclusion.rb index 644cc814a7..5fedb1978b 100644 --- a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/exclusion.rb +++ b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/exclusion.rb @@ -1,35 +1,17 @@ -require 'active_support/core_ext/range' +require "active_model/validations/clusivity" module ActiveModel # == Active Model Exclusion Validator module Validations class ExclusionValidator < EachValidator - ERROR_MESSAGE = "An object with the method #include? or a proc or lambda is required, " << - "and must be supplied as the :in option of the configuration hash" - - def check_validity! - unless [:include?, :call].any? { |method| options[:in].respond_to?(method) } - raise ArgumentError, ERROR_MESSAGE - end - end + include Clusivity def validate_each(record, attribute, value) - delimiter = options[:in] - exclusions = delimiter.respond_to?(:call) ? delimiter.call(record) : delimiter - if exclusions.send(inclusion_method(exclusions), value) + if include?(record, value) record.errors.add(attribute, :exclusion, options.except(:in).merge!(:value => value)) end end - - private - - # In Ruby 1.9 <tt>Range#include?</tt> on non-numeric ranges checks all possible values in the - # range for equality, so it may be slow for large ranges. The new <tt>Range#cover?</tt> - # uses the previous logic of comparing a value with the range endpoints. - def inclusion_method(enumerable) - enumerable.is_a?(Range) ? :cover? : :include? - end end module HelperMethods @@ -59,7 +41,7 @@ module ActiveModel # * <tt>:unless</tt> - Specifies a method, proc or string to call to determine if the validation should # not occur (e.g. <tt>:unless => :skip_validation</tt>, or <tt>:unless => Proc.new { |user| user.signup_step <= 2 }</tt>). The # method, proc or string should return or evaluate to a true or false value. - # * <tt>:strict</tt> - Specifies whether validation should be strict. + # * <tt>:strict</tt> - Specifies whether validation should be strict. # See <tt>ActiveModel::Validation#validates!</tt> for more information def validates_exclusion_of(*attr_names) validates_with ExclusionValidator, _merge_attributes(attr_names) diff --git a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/inclusion.rb b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/inclusion.rb index 147e2ecb69..15ae7b1959 100644 --- a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/inclusion.rb +++ b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/inclusion.rb @@ -1,35 +1,17 @@ -require 'active_support/core_ext/range' +require "active_model/validations/clusivity" module ActiveModel # == Active Model Inclusion Validator module Validations class InclusionValidator < EachValidator - ERROR_MESSAGE = "An object with the method #include? or a proc or lambda is required, " << - "and must be supplied as the :in option of the configuration hash" - - def check_validity! - unless [:include?, :call].any?{ |method| options[:in].respond_to?(method) } - raise ArgumentError, ERROR_MESSAGE - end - end + include Clusivity def validate_each(record, attribute, value) - delimiter = options[:in] - exclusions = delimiter.respond_to?(:call) ? delimiter.call(record) : delimiter - unless exclusions.send(inclusion_method(exclusions), value) + unless include?(record, value) record.errors.add(attribute, :inclusion, options.except(:in).merge!(:value => value)) end end - - private - - # In Ruby 1.9 <tt>Range#include?</tt> on non-numeric ranges checks all possible values in the - # range for equality, so it may be slow for large ranges. The new <tt>Range#cover?</tt> - # uses the previous logic of comparing a value with the range endpoints. - def inclusion_method(enumerable) - enumerable.is_a?(Range) ? :cover? : :include? - end end module HelperMethods @@ -59,7 +41,7 @@ module ActiveModel # * <tt>:unless</tt> - Specifies a method, proc or string to call to determine if the validation should # not occur (e.g. <tt>:unless => :skip_validation</tt>, or <tt>:unless => Proc.new { |user| user.signup_step <= 2 }</tt>). The # method, proc or string should return or evaluate to a true or false value. - # * <tt>:strict</tt> - Specifies whether validation should be strict. + # * <tt>:strict</tt> - Specifies whether validation should be strict. # See <tt>ActiveModel::Validation#validates!</tt> for more information def validates_inclusion_of(*attr_names) validates_with InclusionValidator, _merge_attributes(attr_names) diff --git a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/with.rb b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/with.rb index 72b8562b93..991c5f7b82 100644 --- a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/with.rb +++ b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/with.rb @@ -126,12 +126,12 @@ module ActiveModel # end # # Standard configuration options (:on, :if and :unless), which are - # available on the class version of validates_with, should instead be - # placed on the <tt>validates</tt> method as these are applied and tested + # available on the class version of +validates_with+, should instead be + # placed on the +validates+ method as these are applied and tested # in the callback # # If you pass any additional configuration options, they will be passed - # to the class and available as <tt>options</tt>, please refer to the + # to the class and available as +options+, please refer to the # class version of this method for more information # def validates_with(*args, &block) |