diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/clusivity.rb')
| -rw-r--r-- | activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/clusivity.rb | 23 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/clusivity.rb b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/clusivity.rb index 49df98d6c1..1c35cb7c35 100644 --- a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/clusivity.rb +++ b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/clusivity.rb @@ -15,15 +15,15 @@ module ActiveModel private def include?(record, value) - exclusions = if delimiter.respond_to?(:call) - delimiter.call(record) - elsif delimiter.respond_to?(:to_sym) - record.send(delimiter) - else - delimiter - end + members = if delimiter.respond_to?(:call) + delimiter.call(record) + elsif delimiter.respond_to?(:to_sym) + record.send(delimiter) + else + delimiter + end - exclusions.send(inclusion_method(exclusions), value) + members.send(inclusion_method(members), value) end def delimiter @@ -31,10 +31,11 @@ module ActiveModel end # In Ruby 1.9 <tt>Range#include?</tt> on non-numeric ranges checks all possible values in the - # range for equality, so it may be slow for large ranges. The new <tt>Range#cover?</tt> - # uses the previous logic of comparing a value with the range endpoints. + # range for equality, which is slower but more accurate. <tt>Range#cover?</tt> uses + # the previous logic of comparing a value with the range endpoints, which is fast + # but is only accurate on numeric ranges. def inclusion_method(enumerable) - enumerable.is_a?(Range) ? :cover? : :include? + (enumerable.is_a?(Range) && enumerable.first.is_a?(Numeric)) ? :cover? : :include? end end end |