aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/railties/guides/source/active_support_core_extensions.textile
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorXavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com>2011-02-20 10:52:24 +0100
committerXavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com>2011-02-20 10:52:49 +0100
commite2d54fb3f17ac30c91d855c45060ec5518b75ec5 (patch)
treeb6bee8f71f2942b4a092648d3bf7f9e963ae47a6 /railties/guides/source/active_support_core_extensions.textile
parente984fd43d56797874c532b7d45af8240decfd5ba (diff)
downloadrails-e2d54fb3f17ac30c91d855c45060ec5518b75ec5.tar.gz
rails-e2d54fb3f17ac30c91d855c45060ec5518b75ec5.tar.bz2
rails-e2d54fb3f17ac30c91d855c45060ec5518b75ec5.zip
documents the backported Range#cover?, and related stuff
Diffstat (limited to 'railties/guides/source/active_support_core_extensions.textile')
-rw-r--r--railties/guides/source/active_support_core_extensions.textile10
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/railties/guides/source/active_support_core_extensions.textile b/railties/guides/source/active_support_core_extensions.textile
index 9da8ecc6fc..535a048b3b 100644
--- a/railties/guides/source/active_support_core_extensions.textile
+++ b/railties/guides/source/active_support_core_extensions.textile
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ The default value can be also specified with a block, which is called in the con
class User
attr_accessor :name, :surname
attr_accessor_with_default(:full_name) {
- [name, surname].compact.join(" ")
+ [name, surname].compact.join(" ")
}
end
@@ -2713,6 +2713,14 @@ WARNING: The original +Range#include?+ is still the one aliased to +Range#===+.
NOTE: Defined in +active_support/core_ext/range/include_range.rb+.
+h4. +cover?+
+
+Ruby 1.9 provides +cover?+, and Active Support defines it for previous versions as an alias for +include?+.
+
+The method +include?+ in Ruby 1.9 is different from the one in 1.8 for non-numeric ranges: instead of being based on comparisons between the value and the range's endpoints, it walks the range with +succ+ looking for value. This works better for ranges with holes, but it has different complexity and may not finish in some other cases.
+
+In Ruby 1.9 the old behavior is still available in the new +cover?+, which Active Support backports for forward compatibility. For example, Rails uses +cover?+ for ranges in +validates_inclusion_of+.
+
h4. +overlaps?+
The method +Range#overlaps?+ says whether any two given ranges have non-void intersection: