summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md')
-rw-r--r--content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md25
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md b/content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b68bd12
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
++++
+title = "Are we up for anonymity?"
+lang = "en"
+
+[taxonomies]
+tags = ["press", "freedom", "anonymity", "privacy", "surveillance"]
+
+[extra]
+author = "harald"
++++
+
+The Berliner Gazette explores the negative stigma around anonymity, and asks
+what this means for a free press and privacy.
+
+> The dominant narrative of anonymity, as portrayed in popular media, is an
+> unflattering one and its usage is associated with trolling, seedy
+> transactions, harassment and terrorism. The conventional wisdom seems to be
+> that online anonymity protects criminals and enables the hateful and toxic
+> side of human nature. Such a negative reputation undermines an important
+> practice with many legitimate uses. Anonymity can also offer vital protection
+> to those who need it most.
+
+Read the [full article].
+
+[full article]: http://berlinergazette.de/are-we-up-for-anonymity/