| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the default connection permissions for those who don't have a predefined (or therefore have a "custom") permissions role. Unfortunately this includes most people that were using this software more than a month ago. The real changes are that the SELF address book entry no longer holds "auto-permissions" but instead holds your "default permissions" (if you have a pre-defined role, the defaults will be pulled from the role table).
The auto permissions have moved to a pconfig (uid.system.autoperms). A DB update will move these settings into their new homes.
What used to be the "Auto-permissions settings" page is now the "default permissions settings" page and a checkbox therein decides whether or not to apply the permissions automatically. A link to this page will only be shown when you have the "custom" role selected.
With luck nobody will notice anything wrong. But at least for the next few days, please review permissions that have been assigned to new connections (either automatically or manually) and make sure they make sense (e.g. they aren't "nothing"). You still need to take action when seeing a message "permissions have changed but not yet submitted" as we always let you review and perhaps adjust the settings _before_ a connection is established (unless you have autoperms turned on).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
this over and tested a lot of edge cases, and thought about from every angle I can think of to prevent looping. I don't *think* this can loop. I also doubt that this is the problem at friendicared.de, but I don't know for sure what that problem might be.
|
|
|
|
| |
back on
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
prevent them from recursing
|
|
|
|
| |
a missing top-level post to match it with. So we'll send a request back to the sender that you've never seen this thread and please send a fresh copy of the entire conversation to date. We could soon have posts in the matrix from different platforms from days gone by, which have been migrated into the modern world. We'll be polite and not deliver these to everybody. However, if someone comments on one of these antique threads we wouldn't be able to see it in our own matrix because we won't have a copy of the parent post. So this rectifies that situation. Be aware that item deletion may need to change to keep "hard deleted" items indefinitely so that they don't keep coming back. We'll have to null out the important data of the former item to accomplish the deletion aspect.
|
|
|
|
| |
being relayed more than once - as it's a huge drain on resources. But last time I tried this, wall-to-wall comments stopped getting relayed. This checkin should do the right thing in both conditions.
|
|
|
|
| |
directory update packet.
|
|
|
|
| |
is inconsistent data which you think you trust.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
change but it is unrelated to current issues, basically if no primary was set we were setting everything as primary.
|
|
|
|
| |
issue #633
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
delivery chains, which were not adequately accounted for in the earlier checkin.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This checkin implements route matching of comments so that they are only accepted from the same route as the top-level post they are attached to. This way there should be no mis-match of permissions between any posts in the thread. It may not be completely compatible with comments posted in the past (though I've tried to be, there may be some minor issues). In addition it seems that relaying was invoked more often than necessary - especially when a duplicate post arrived which was not processed because the edited time hadn't changed - it still invoked relaying. This fix should improve site performance considerably for comments cross-posted to forums; which got bounced around a bit and delivered redundantly for no reason.
Roll this back *only* if it causes a meltdown or comment loss is "serious" (as in OMG people are dying, make it stop!). If we can get past 24 hours without serious issue we need to get everybody onto this code. There may be some minor comment loss (mostly affecting new comments to older posts or likes of older comments) until the majority of sites have moved to the new code.
It may be difficult or impossible to deliver comments to posts that pre-date the addition of source routes (April 1, 2014) to anybody but the top-level post author at his/her primary hub. We may wish to close comments on these posts, but let's see how we go before doing that.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
problems. Also clean up fetch_url/post_url header option
|
|
|
|
| |
("friends") and total_feeds both when importing channels and subsequently when syncing clones. Limits are based on the local system - additional entries are silently dropped.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
now been split off into its own function. Cross fingers because this is core functionality which was tried and true, well tested; and now it's a bit different.
Please revert this if the matrix breaks in the next few hours.
|
|
|
|
| |
don't rush me. This is going to become a fundamental part of zot. It deserves careful consideration.
|
|
|
|
| |
still a fair ways from being complete and is not ready for prime time. Basically we'll let a channel send out a public message saying "these are my currently approved locations" and anything that isn't in the list will be marked deleted. We'll send out this message when locations change somehow - either through direct personal involvement (hub revoke, change primary, channel import) or during a system rename or "find bad/obsolete hublocs" activity. This way we won't have clones sending back location info we just got rid of and re-importing the bad entries.
|
|
|
|
| |
issues we'll just make it '-'.
|
|
|
|
| |
easily mis-typed sequence '0000-00-00 00:00:00'
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
a whole slew of FIXMEs
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
notifier is setup to take hublocs, not xchans.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
xchan_import - I suspect we don't have anything useful at all.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
public, but they didn't set the private flag.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
can later add alternate encodings.
|
|
|
|
| |
across sites.
|