| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
| |
test
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Remove obsolete field for system lang from site admin page.
See merge request hubzilla/core!2111
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The field was commented out in the module, but still remained in the
template. This patch also removes some processing to discover available
languages whose result were not used.
This should fix https://framagit.org/hubzilla/core/-/issues/1840
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Add some beginning tests for bbcode, and a bit of refactoring
See merge request hubzilla/core!2110
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Update Doxygen config for generating online API docs
See merge request hubzilla/core!2109
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Enabled implicit brief descriptions (`JAVADOC_AUTOBRIEF`), and markdown
support (`MARKDOWN_SUPPORT`) for doc blocks. This means that we no
longer need to explicitly inclufe a `@brief` tag in the doc block, the
first full sentence will be regarded as the brief documentation if it's
not explicitly given. Also we can use Markdown formatting in the
comments, which is a bit nicer than the native Doxygen tags.
I also disabled the Doxygen_phpvarfilter, but leave it commented out. It
should not be needed anymore unless somebody is using an ancient version
of doxygen. (Don't do that!)
I also changed the heading a bit, removed "The" from "The Hubzilla", and
added a tagline. Feel free to revise to whatever conforms to the project
norms.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
include/dba: Make Dba driver transaction aware.
See merge request hubzilla/core!2108
|
| | |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This patch introduced database transaction support to the Dba driver via
the DbaTransaction class.
The goal of this is to allow the driver control over the creation and
finalization of database transactions.
Until now code that has needed transaction support has done so directly
by issuing "BEGIN", "ROLLBACK" and "COMMIT" commands to the underlying
database directly.
This has several disadvantages:
- We do have no control or knowledge of whether any transactions being
active.
- Since transactions can not be nested, we run the risk of unrelated
code trying to create a transaction when one is already active.
- Code using transactions are not testable, as the test runner wraps
all tests within a transaction to begin with.
This patch should eliminate all these problems.
A transaction is started by instantiating the DbaTransaction class:
$my_transaction = new \DbaTransaction();
The transaction will automatically be _rolled back_ if it has not been
committed before the instance is destroyed. (When the variable holding
it goes out of scope, i.e when the containing function returns.)
A transaction is committed like this:
$my_transaction->commit();
This will immediately commit the changes in the transaction, and the
transaction will be marked as committed, so it will not be attempted to
be rolled back on destruction.
I have chosen to "ignore" the problem of nested transactions by having
the DbaTransaction class _not_ initiate a new transaction if one is
already active. This also makes the rollback and commit actions of the
DbaTransaction class into no-ops.
An alternative would be to simulate nested transactions by using save
points if a transaction is already active. However, I'm unsure about
wether there's any safe way to avoid all potential pitfalls when doing
that.
In any case, nested transactions should preferably be avoided, and
afaict we don't rely on that in any of the existing code. The reason we
need to support it in some way is that it's needed for testing where the
code under test is creating a transaction on it's own. (Since each test
is run within a db transaction to begin with.)
Also, I have taken the liberty to assume a PDO based db driver for this
stuff. I don't think that's going to be a problem, as that's the only
thing supported by the rest of the code in any case.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | | |/
| |/|
| | | |
(cherry picked from commit 5d64a9c90f74886e0608766a84ad4721496e3b39)
|
| |/ / |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
