<%= form.label :title %>
<%= form.text_field :title %>
<%= form.label :text %>
<%= form.text_area :text %>
<%= form.submit %>
<% end %> ``` If you refresh the page now, you'll see the exact same form from our example above. Building forms in Rails is really just that easy! When you call `form_with`, you pass it an identifying scope for this form. In this case, it's the symbol `:article`. This tells the `form_with` helper what this form is for. Inside the block for this method, the `FormBuilder` object - represented by `form` - is used to build two labels and two text fields, one each for the title and text of an article. Finally, a call to `submit` on the `form` object will create a submit button for the form. There's one problem with this form though. If you inspect the HTML that is generated, by viewing the source of the page, you will see that the `action` attribute for the form is pointing at `/articles/new`. This is a problem because this route goes to the very page that you're on right at the moment, and that route should only be used to display the form for a new article. The form needs to use a different URL in order to go somewhere else. This can be done quite simply with the `:url` option of `form_with`. Typically in Rails, the action that is used for new form submissions like this is called "create", and so the form should be pointed to that action. Edit the `form_with` line inside `app/views/articles/new.html.erb` to look like this: ```html+erb <%= form_with scope: :article, url: articles_path, local: true do |form| %> ``` In this example, the `articles_path` helper is passed to the `:url` option. To see what Rails will do with this, we look back at the output of `bin/rails routes`: ```bash $ bin/rails routes Prefix Verb URI Pattern Controller#Action articles GET /articles(.:format) articles#index POST /articles(.:format) articles#create new_article GET /articles/new(.:format) articles#new edit_article GET /articles/:id/edit(.:format) articles#edit article GET /articles/:id(.:format) articles#show PATCH /articles/:id(.:format) articles#update PUT /articles/:id(.:format) articles#update DELETE /articles/:id(.:format) articles#destroy root GET / welcome#index ``` The `articles_path` helper tells Rails to point the form to the URI Pattern associated with the `articles` prefix; and the form will (by default) send a `POST` request to that route. This is associated with the `create` action of the current controller, the `ArticlesController`. With the form and its associated route defined, you will be able to fill in the form and then click the submit button to begin the process of creating a new article, so go ahead and do that. When you submit the form, you should see a familiar error: ![Unknown action create for ArticlesController] (images/getting_started/unknown_action_create_for_articles.png) You now need to create the `create` action within the `ArticlesController` for this to work. NOTE: By default `form_with` submits forms using Ajax thereby skipping full page redirects. To make this guide easier to get into we've disabled that with `local: true` for now. ### Creating articles To make the "Unknown action" go away, you can define a `create` action within the `ArticlesController` class in `app/controllers/articles_controller.rb`, underneath the `new` action, as shown: ```ruby class ArticlesController < ApplicationController def new end def create end end ``` If you re-submit the form now, you may not see any change on the page. Don't worry! This is because Rails by default returns `204 No Content` response for an action if we don't specify what the response should be. We just added the `create` action but didn't specify anything about how the response should be. In this case, the `create` action should save our new article to the database. When a form is submitted, the fields of the form are sent to Rails as _parameters_. These parameters can then be referenced inside the controller actions, typically to perform a particular task. To see what these parameters look like, change the `create` action to this: ```ruby def create render plain: params[:article].inspect end ``` The `render` method here is taking a very simple hash with a key of `:plain` and value of `params[:article].inspect`. The `params` method is the object which represents the parameters (or fields) coming in from the form. The `params` method returns an `ActionController::Parameters` object, which allows you to access the keys of the hash using either strings or symbols. In this situation, the only parameters that matter are the ones from the form. TIP: Ensure you have a firm grasp of the `params` method, as you'll use it fairly regularly. Let's consider an example URL: **http://www.example.com/?username=dhh&email=dhh@email.com**. In this URL, `params[:username]` would equal "dhh" and `params[:email]` would equal "dhh@email.com". If you re-submit the form one more time, you'll see something that looks like the following: ```rubyTitle: <%= @article.title %>
Text: <%= @article.text %>
``` With this change, you should finally be able to create new articles. Visit| Title | Text | |
|---|---|---|
| <%= article.title %> | <%= article.text %> | <%= link_to 'Show', article_path(article) %> |
| Title | Text | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| <%= article.title %> | <%= article.text %> | <%= link_to 'Show', article_path(article) %> | <%= link_to 'Edit', edit_article_path(article) %> |
<%= form.label :title %>
<%= form.text_field :title %>
<%= form.label :text %>
<%= form.text_area :text %>
<%= form.submit %>
<% end %> ``` Everything except for the `form_with` declaration remained the same. The reason we can use this shorter, simpler `form_with` declaration to stand in for either of the other forms is that `@article` is a *resource* corresponding to a full set of RESTful routes, and Rails is able to infer which URI and method to use. For more information about this use of `form_with`, see [Resource-oriented style] (http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/FormHelper.html#method-i-form_with-label-Resource-oriented+style). Now, let's update the `app/views/articles/new.html.erb` view to use this new partial, rewriting it completely: ```html+erb| Title | Text | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <%= article.title %> | <%= article.text %> | <%= link_to 'Show', article_path(article) %> | <%= link_to 'Edit', edit_article_path(article) %> | <%= link_to 'Destroy', article_path(article), method: :delete, data: { confirm: 'Are you sure?' } %> |
Title: <%= @article.title %>
Text: <%= @article.text %>
<%= form.label :commenter %>
<%= form.text_field :commenter %>
<%= form.label :body %>
<%= form.text_area :body %>
<%= form.submit %>
<% end %> <%= link_to 'Edit', edit_article_path(@article) %> | <%= link_to 'Back', articles_path %> ``` This adds a form on the `Article` show page that creates a new comment by calling the `CommentsController` `create` action. The `form_with` call here uses an array, which will build a nested route, such as `/articles/1/comments`. Let's wire up the `create` in `app/controllers/comments_controller.rb`: ```ruby class CommentsController < ApplicationController def create @article = Article.find(params[:article_id]) @comment = @article.comments.create(comment_params) redirect_to article_path(@article) end private def comment_params params.require(:comment).permit(:commenter, :body) end end ``` You'll see a bit more complexity here than you did in the controller for articles. That's a side-effect of the nesting that you've set up. Each request for a comment has to keep track of the article to which the comment is attached, thus the initial call to the `find` method of the `Article` model to get the article in question. In addition, the code takes advantage of some of the methods available for an association. We use the `create` method on `@article.comments` to create and save the comment. This will automatically link the comment so that it belongs to that particular article. Once we have made the new comment, we send the user back to the original article using the `article_path(@article)` helper. As we have already seen, this calls the `show` action of the `ArticlesController` which in turn renders the `show.html.erb` template. This is where we want the comment to show, so let's add that to the `app/views/articles/show.html.erb`. ```html+erbTitle: <%= @article.title %>
Text: <%= @article.text %>
Commenter: <%= comment.commenter %>
Comment: <%= comment.body %>
<% end %>
<%= form.label :commenter %>
<%= form.text_field :commenter %>
<%= form.label :body %>
<%= form.text_area :body %>
<%= form.submit %>
<% end %> <%= link_to 'Edit', edit_article_path(@article) %> | <%= link_to 'Back', articles_path %> ``` Now you can add articles and comments to your blog and have them show up in the right places.  Refactoring ----------- Now that we have articles and comments working, take a look at the `app/views/articles/show.html.erb` template. It is getting long and awkward. We can use partials to clean it up. ### Rendering Partial Collections First, we will make a comment partial to extract showing all the comments for the article. Create the file `app/views/comments/_comment.html.erb` and put the following into it: ```html+erbCommenter: <%= comment.commenter %>
Comment: <%= comment.body %>
``` Then you can change `app/views/articles/show.html.erb` to look like the following: ```html+erbTitle: <%= @article.title %>
Text: <%= @article.text %>
<%= form.label :commenter %>
<%= form.text_field :commenter %>
<%= form.label :body %>
<%= form.text_area :body %>
<%= form.submit %>
<% end %> <%= link_to 'Edit', edit_article_path(@article) %> | <%= link_to 'Back', articles_path %> ``` This will now render the partial in `app/views/comments/_comment.html.erb` once for each comment that is in the `@article.comments` collection. As the `render` method iterates over the `@article.comments` collection, it assigns each comment to a local variable named the same as the partial, in this case `comment` which is then available in the partial for us to show. ### Rendering a Partial Form Let us also move that new comment section out to its own partial. Again, you create a file `app/views/comments/_form.html.erb` containing: ```html+erb <%= form_with(model: [ @article, @article.comments.build ], local: true) do |form| %>
<%= form.label :commenter %>
<%= form.text_field :commenter %>
<%= form.label :body %>
<%= form.text_area :body %>
<%= form.submit %>
<% end %> ``` Then you make the `app/views/articles/show.html.erb` look like the following: ```html+erbTitle: <%= @article.title %>
Text: <%= @article.text %>
Commenter: <%= comment.commenter %>
Comment: <%= comment.body %>
<%= link_to 'Destroy Comment', [comment.article, comment], method: :delete, data: { confirm: 'Are you sure?' } %>
``` Clicking this new "Destroy Comment" link will fire off a `DELETE /articles/:article_id/comments/:id` to our `CommentsController`, which can then use this to find the comment we want to delete, so let's add a `destroy` action to our controller (`app/controllers/comments_controller.rb`): ```ruby class CommentsController < ApplicationController def create @article = Article.find(params[:article_id]) @comment = @article.comments.create(comment_params) redirect_to article_path(@article) end def destroy @article = Article.find(params[:article_id]) @comment = @article.comments.find(params[:id]) @comment.destroy redirect_to article_path(@article) end private def comment_params params.require(:comment).permit(:commenter, :body) end end ``` The `destroy` action will find the article we are looking at, locate the comment within the `@article.comments` collection, and then remove it from the database and send us back to the show action for the article. ### Deleting Associated Objects If you delete an article, its associated comments will also need to be deleted, otherwise they would simply occupy space in the database. Rails allows you to use the `dependent` option of an association to achieve this. Modify the Article model, `app/models/article.rb`, as follows: ```ruby class Article < ApplicationRecord has_many :comments, dependent: :destroy validates :title, presence: true, length: { minimum: 5 } end ``` Security -------- ### Basic Authentication If you were to publish your blog online, anyone would be able to add, edit and delete articles or delete comments. Rails provides a very simple HTTP authentication system that will work nicely in this situation. In the `ArticlesController` we need to have a way to block access to the various actions if the person is not authenticated. Here we can use the Rails `http_basic_authenticate_with` method, which allows access to the requested action if that method allows it. To use the authentication system, we specify it at the top of our `ArticlesController` in `app/controllers/articles_controller.rb`. In our case, we want the user to be authenticated on every action except `index` and `show`, so we write that: ```ruby class ArticlesController < ApplicationController http_basic_authenticate_with name: "dhh", password: "secret", except: [:index, :show] def index @articles = Article.all end # snippet for brevity ``` We also want to allow only authenticated users to delete comments, so in the `CommentsController` (`app/controllers/comments_controller.rb`) we write: ```ruby class CommentsController < ApplicationController http_basic_authenticate_with name: "dhh", password: "secret", only: :destroy def create @article = Article.find(params[:article_id]) # ... end # snippet for brevity ``` Now if you try to create a new article, you will be greeted with a basic HTTP Authentication challenge:  Other authentication methods are available for Rails applications. Two popular authentication add-ons for Rails are the [Devise](https://github.com/plataformatec/devise) rails engine and the [Authlogic](https://github.com/binarylogic/authlogic) gem, along with a number of others. ### Other Security Considerations Security, especially in web applications, is a broad and detailed area. Security in your Rails application is covered in more depth in the [Ruby on Rails Security Guide](security.html). What's Next? ------------ Now that you've seen your first Rails application, you should feel free to update it and experiment on your own. Remember you don't have to do everything without help. As you need assistance getting up and running with Rails, feel free to consult these support resources: * The [Ruby on Rails Guides](index.html) * The [Ruby on Rails Tutorial](http://railstutorial.org/book) * The [Ruby on Rails mailing list](http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk) * The [#rubyonrails](irc://irc.freenode.net/#rubyonrails) channel on irc.freenode.net Configuration Gotchas --------------------- The easiest way to work with Rails is to store all external data as UTF-8. If you don't, Ruby libraries and Rails will often be able to convert your native data into UTF-8, but this doesn't always work reliably, so you're better off ensuring that all external data is UTF-8. If you have made a mistake in this area, the most common symptom is a black diamond with a question mark inside appearing in the browser. Another common symptom is characters like "ü" appearing instead of "ü". Rails takes a number of internal steps to mitigate common causes of these problems that can be automatically detected and corrected. However, if you have external data that is not stored as UTF-8, it can occasionally result in these kinds of issues that cannot be automatically detected by Rails and corrected. Two very common sources of data that are not UTF-8: * Your text editor: Most text editors (such as TextMate), default to saving files as UTF-8. If your text editor does not, this can result in special characters that you enter in your templates (such as é) to appear as a diamond with a question mark inside in the browser. This also applies to your i18n translation files. Most editors that do not already default to UTF-8 (such as some versions of Dreamweaver) offer a way to change the default to UTF-8. Do so. * Your database: Rails defaults to converting data from your database into UTF-8 at the boundary. However, if your database is not using UTF-8 internally, it may not be able to store all characters that your users enter. For instance, if your database is using Latin-1 internally, and your user enters a Russian, Hebrew, or Japanese character, the data will be lost forever once it enters the database. If possible, use UTF-8 as the internal storage of your database.