From ca9ac310028d0009edf1fbf657541d2dea327535 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryuta Kamizono Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:29:05 +0900 Subject: `respond_to_missing?` should be private Follow up of 03d3f036. Some of `respond_to?` were replaced to `respond_to_missing?` in 03d3f036. But the visibility is still public. It should be private. --- railties/lib/rails/railtie.rb | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'railties') diff --git a/railties/lib/rails/railtie.rb b/railties/lib/rails/railtie.rb index 474118c0a9..3476bb0eb5 100644 --- a/railties/lib/rails/railtie.rb +++ b/railties/lib/rails/railtie.rb @@ -162,10 +162,6 @@ module Rails @instance ||= new end - def respond_to_missing?(*args) - instance.respond_to?(*args) || super - end - # Allows you to configure the railtie. This is the same method seen in # Railtie::Configurable, but this module is no longer required for all # subclasses of Railtie so we provide the class method here. @@ -178,6 +174,10 @@ module Rails ActiveSupport::Inflector.underscore(string).tr("/", "_") end + def respond_to_missing?(name, _) + instance.respond_to?(name) || super + end + # If the class method does not have a method, then send the method call # to the Railtie instance. def method_missing(name, *args, &block) -- cgit v1.2.3