From ceca3a0564000024e2bbb273a431c3063f2011c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pratik Naik <pratiknaik@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:23:29 +0100
Subject: Improve example for having()

---
 railties/guides/source/active_record_querying.textile | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'railties/guides/source/active_record_querying.textile')

diff --git a/railties/guides/source/active_record_querying.textile b/railties/guides/source/active_record_querying.textile
index f93ff15a75..aa837f7ddf 100644
--- a/railties/guides/source/active_record_querying.textile
+++ b/railties/guides/source/active_record_querying.textile
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ SQL uses the +HAVING+ clause to specify conditions on the +GROUP BY+ fields. You
 For example:
 
 <ruby>
-Order.group("date(created_at)".having(["created_at > ?", 1.month.ago])
+Order.group("date(created_at)".having("created_at > ?", 1.month.ago)
 </ruby>
 
 The SQL that would be executed would be something like this:
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

