From 40b209db53796ae515387d0fee2a525872eb2ae4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alberto Almagro Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 22:02:51 +0200 Subject: Recommend use of rails over bin/rails As discussed in #33203 rails command already looks for, and runs, bin/rails if it is present. We were mixing recommendations within guides and USAGE guidelines, in some files we recommended using rails, in others bin/rails and in some cases we even had both options mixed together. --- activestorage/test/dummy/config/secrets.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'activestorage/test/dummy/config/secrets.yml') diff --git a/activestorage/test/dummy/config/secrets.yml b/activestorage/test/dummy/config/secrets.yml index 77d1fc383a..18ada4405e 100644 --- a/activestorage/test/dummy/config/secrets.yml +++ b/activestorage/test/dummy/config/secrets.yml @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ test: # Do not keep production secrets in the unencrypted secrets file. # Instead, either read values from the environment. -# Or, use `bin/rails secrets:setup` to configure encrypted secrets +# Or, use `rails secrets:setup` to configure encrypted secrets # and move the `production:` environment over there. production: -- cgit v1.2.3